Robotic vs Laparoscopic Study. Spanish Cost Effective Snapshot Study

NCT04861974 | Unknown DMC

• 1 other identifier: Robocostes
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 180
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

this is a prospective no randomized study of cost effectiveness of laparoscopic vs robotic study of Distal pancreatectomy, Hernioplasty for inguinal hernia and Rectal resection

Conditions

Laparoscopy; Robotic

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Cost Effectiveness

  This is the increased cost differences of the new technology to improve the quality of life after the intervention

  90 days

Study Arms (10)

Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy

Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy

Robotic Gastrectomy

Laparoscopic Gastrectomy

Robotic Funduplication

Laparoscopic Funduplication

Robotic Hernioplasty

Laparoscopic Hernioplasty

Robotic Rectal Resection

Laparoscopic Rectal Resection

Eligibility Criteria

• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

Elective surgery with indication of distal Pancreatectomy , Gastrectomy, Hernioplasty, Rectal resection and Nissen

You may qualify if:

• Elective surgery with indication of distal Pancreatectomy , Gastrectomy, Hernioplasty, Rectal resection and Nissen performed by laparoscopy or robotic
• \>18 years old

You may not qualify if:

• Patients who do not want to participate
• Previous abdominal surgeries

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Hospital del Mar: lead

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: MD, PhD

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: April 21, 2021
• First Posted: April 27, 2021
• Study Start: June 15, 2021
• Primary Completion: April 15, 2022
• Study Completion: June 15, 2022
• Last Updated: April 27, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-04