3-dimensional Versus 2-dimensional Laparoscopy for Myomectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes and efficacy of 3-dimensional (3D) versus 2-dimensional (2D) imaging systems in laparoscopic myomectomy..
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 23, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 23, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 23, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 28, 2019
CompletedAugust 28, 2019
August 1, 2019
Same day
August 23, 2019
August 25, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Amount of operative blood loss
Amount of operative blood loss was measured by the anesthesiologists after defining it as the difference between the total amount of suction and irrigation plus the difference between the total gauze weight before and after surgery.
At the time of surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Operative time
At the day of surgery
Study Arms (2)
3D laparoscope
EXPERIMENTALFor laparoscopic camera system, a 10-mm ENDOEYE FLEX 3D Deflectable Videoscope (Olympus Corp., Germany) was used in the 3D group.
2D laparoscope
EXPERIMENTALFor laparoscopic camera system, a 10-mm 30º IDEAL EYES Laparoscope (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) camera was used in the 2D group.
Interventions
For laparoscopic camera system, a 10-mm ENDOEYE FLEX 3D Deflectable Videoscope (Olympus Corp., Germany) was used in the 3D group.
For laparoscopic camera system, a 10-mm 30º IDEAL EYES Laparoscope (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) camera was used in the 2D group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Uterine myoma requiring laparoscopic myomectomy
- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASAPS) classification I-II
- absence of pregnancy at the time of surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- any suspicious findings of malignant gynecologic diseases,
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
Seoul, 03181, South Korea
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Taejong Song, MD PhD
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 23, 2019
First Posted
August 28, 2019
Study Start
August 23, 2019
Primary Completion
August 23, 2019
Study Completion
August 23, 2019
Last Updated
August 28, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share