Comparison of the Effectiveness of 2D Versus 3D Basic Laparoscopic Skills Training
Comparison of 3D Versus 2D Training of Basic Laparoscopic Skills in Terms of Training Effectiveness
1 other identifier
interventional
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to find out whether basic laparoscopic skills training (FLS tasks) on a standard pelvic trainer using conventional 2D visualization is at least equally effective in terms of skills improvement compared to practicing with 3D visualization. Furthermore, the progress in basic laparoscopic skills improvement for each visualization modality will be analyzed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 13, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 28, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 4, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 14, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 14, 2018
CompletedApril 1, 2019
March 1, 2019
1 month
November 28, 2018
March 29, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement in total Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) manual skills scores using 2D versus 3D training of basic laparoscopic skills (using four different FLS tasks)
Performance of four different Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) tasks will be assessed according to the time needed to complete the task as well as the accuracy of task performance using the FLS scoring system as previously described \[Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, et al. Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 1998;175:482-7.\]. The improvement of performance for the total score as well as for each FLS task will be calculated by subtracting the baseline test scores from the posttraining test scores. The primary outcome measure will be the improvement in total test scores.
5 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Progress in basic laparoscopic skills improvement according to the time required for completion of the different FLS tasks during the training period in the 3D and the 2D visualization group
5 weeks
Study Arms (2)
3D training
OTHERBasic laparoscopic skills (FLS tasks) training using 3D visualization
2D training
OTHERBasic laparoscopic skills (FLS tasks) training using 2D visualization
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- medical students with limited experience in laparoscopic surgery
You may not qualify if:
- any laparoscopic operation performed as the primary surgeon
- regular (e.g., once per month) practice on a box trainer for the last 12 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical University Vienna
Vienna, Austria
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Heinrich Husslein, MD, PLL.M.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assoc.-Prof. Priv.-Doz. Dr., PLL.M.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 28, 2018
First Posted
December 4, 2018
Study Start
November 13, 2018
Primary Completion
December 14, 2018
Study Completion
December 14, 2018
Last Updated
April 1, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share