Comparing Two-Needle vs. Surgery-Guided Arthrocentesis for TMJ Disorders
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Conventional Two-Needle Arthrocentesis Versus Surgery-Guided Arthrocentesis in the Management of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two methods of arthrocentesis in treating temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is surgery-guided arthrocentesis more efficient in terms of operation time compared to traditional two-needle arthrocentesis? Does the use of surgical guides lead to less postoperative pain and better patient comfort? Participants will: Undergo either the traditional two-needle arthrocentesis or the surgery-guided arthrocentesis. Be monitored for operation time, postoperative pain, and overall patient comfort. Researchers will compare the outcomes of patients who underwent traditional two-needle arthrocentesis with those who had surgery-guided arthrocentesis to see if the latter can shorten operation time and improve patient comfort.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 10, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 10, 2024
CompletedJuly 12, 2024
July 1, 2024
5 months
September 20, 2023
July 11, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total Duration of Arthrocentesis Procedure
he primary outcome measure of the study is the total time duration required to complete the arthrocentesis procedure. This duration will be measured from the time local anesthesia is administered to the time when the arthrocentesis is completed. In addition, the number of intraoperative repositions of the needles will also be recorded.
Immediately following the completion of each arthrocentesis procedure, anticipated to occur on the day of the surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Volume of Ringer's Solution Used for Joint Irrigation
Immediately following the completion of each arthrocentesis procedure, anticipated to occur on the day of the surgery.
Change in Postoperative Pain
7 days
Change in Mouth Opening
7 days
Change in Facial Swelling
7 days
Study Arms (2)
Traditional Arthrocentesis Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSurgery-Guided Arthrocentesis Group
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Participants in this group will undergo arthrocentesis using the traditional two-needle technique. The procedure involves the placement of one or two needles into the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) to irrigate the joint space. Needle placement is guided by anatomical landmarks.
Participants in this group will receive arthrocentesis facilitated by a surgical guide. The guide is generated through pre-operative planning and is designed to aid in the accurate placement of the needle into the TMJ.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients diagnosed with Wilkes stage II, III, or IV Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) internal derangement.
- Presence of pain, sound, or both in the TMJ.
- Limitation or locking in mouth opening, or both.
- Patients who have not responded to symptoms after a minimum of three months of splint therapy.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of infection in the puncture area.
- Presence of osteomyelitis in the neighboring region.
- Patients with uncontrolled coagulopathies.
- Patients experiencing limitation in maximum mouth opening without disk disorder.
- Patients with severe degenerative joint disease (e.g., deformed condylar contour, osteophyte findings in MRI).
- History of TMJ surgery.
- History of muscle-originated mandibular hypomobility.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Marmara University School of Dentistry
Istanbul, 34854, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2023
First Posted
September 28, 2023
Study Start
September 10, 2023
Primary Completion
February 10, 2024
Study Completion
February 10, 2024
Last Updated
July 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07