Study on Classification Method of Indocyanine Green Lymphography Based on Deep Learning
BCRL;ICG
1 other identifier
observational
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) is the most common complication after breast cancer surgery, which brings a heavy psychological and spiritual burden to patients. For a long time, the diagnosis and treatment of lymphedema has been a difficult point in domestic and foreign research. To a large extent, it is because most of the patients who come to see a doctor have already developed obvious lymphedema, and the internal lymphatic vessels have undergone pathological remodeling\[1\] Therefore, it is particularly important to detect early lymphedema and intervene in time through the use of sensitive screening tools. Indocyanine green (ICG) lymphangiography is a relatively new method, which can display superficial lymph flow in real time and quickly, and will not be affected by radioactivity \[7\]. In 2007, indocyanine green lymphography was used for the first time to evaluate the function of superficial lymphatic vessels. In 2011, Japanese scholars found skin reflux signs based on ICG lymphography data of 20 patients with lymphedema after breast cancer surgery, and they were roughly divided into three types according to their severity: splash, star cluster, and diffuse (Figure 1) \[8\]. Later, in 2016, a prospective study involving 196 people affirmed the value of ICG lymphography in the early diagnosis of lymphedema, and made the images of ICG lymphography more specific stages 0-5 \[9\], but The staging is still based on the three types of skin reflux symptoms found in a small sample clinical study in 2011, which is not completely applicable in actual clinical applications. In addition, when abnormal skin reflux symptoms appear on ICG lymphangiography, the pathophysiological changes that occur in the body lack research and exploration. Therefore, this research hopes to refine the image features of ICG lymphography through machine learning (deep learning), and establish a PKUPH model for diagnosing early lymphedema by staging the image features.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2016
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 27, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2022
CompletedApril 1, 2021
March 1, 2021
6 years
March 27, 2021
March 27, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Establish a PKUPH model for the diagnosis of lymphedema by ICG based on deep learning
Establish a PKUPH model for the diagnosis of lymphedema by ICG based on deep learning
2016-2022
Study Arms (3)
label 1
Baseline data measurement of this group of patients: arm circumference(positive) and ICG (positive).
label 2
Baseline data measurement of this group of patients: arm circumference(negative) and ICG (positive).
label 3
Baseline data measurement of this group of patients: arm circumference(negative) and ICG (negative).
Interventions
No Intervention.Only learn ICG image features of different label groups
Eligibility Criteria
patients who have been admitted to the Breast Surgery Clinic due to the main complaint of upper extremity edema
You may qualify if:
- From October 2016 to present, about 200 patients who have been admitted to the Breast Surgery Clinic due to the main complaint of upper extremity edema, are willing to accept ICG lymphography, arm circumference measurement, drainage measurement, bioelectrical impedance measurement, main complaint scale, etc. .
You may not qualify if:
- Bilateral breast cancer; history of contrast agent allergy; arteriovenous thrombosis in the affected limb; regional lymph node recurrence; no informed consent; severe heart and brain diseases; primary lymphatic system disease (such as lymphatic leakage); unilateral only The limbs received ICG imaging.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Peking University People's Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Related Publications (4)
Beek MA, te Slaa A, van der Laan L, Mulder PG, Rutten HJ, Voogd AC, Luiten EJ, Gobardhan PD. Reliability of the Inverse Water Volumetry Method to Measure the Volume of the Upper Limb. Lymphat Res Biol. 2015 Jun;13(2):126-30. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2015.0011.
PMID: 26091408BACKGROUNDShi S, Lu Q, Fu MR, Ouyang Q, Liu C, Lv J, Wang Y. Psychometric properties of the Breast Cancer and Lymphedema Symptom Experience Index: The Chinese version. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Feb;20:10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
PMID: 26071198BACKGROUNDMihara M, Hara H, Araki J, Kikuchi K, Narushima M, Yamamoto T, Iida T, Yoshimatsu H, Murai N, Mitsui K, Okitsu T, Koshima I. Indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography is superior to lymphoscintigraphy for diagnostic imaging of early lymphedema of the upper limbs. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038182. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
PMID: 22675520BACKGROUNDYamamoto T, Yamamoto N, Doi K, Oshima A, Yoshimatsu H, Todokoro T, Ogata F, Mihara M, Narushima M, Iida T, Koshima I. Indocyanine green-enhanced lymphography for upper extremity lymphedema: a novel severity staging system using dermal backflow patterns. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Oct;128(4):941-947. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182268cd9.
PMID: 21681123BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shu Wang, Dr
Breast Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 27, 2021
First Posted
April 1, 2021
Study Start
October 1, 2016
Primary Completion
October 1, 2022
Study Completion
October 1, 2022
Last Updated
April 1, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
there is no plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers