NCT04823650

Brief Summary

COHORT A: To study whether a digital health tool called Actigraph can be used to collect information on gait and physical activity in healthy children aged 3-17. The study will be conducted at the Pfizer Innovation Research Laboratory (PfIRe Lab) in Cambridge MA. In the lab at the first visit, we will ask participants to do activities such as walking on different surfaces as well as to roll a dice and move between different activity stations. Children will wear 2 Actigraph devices, one as a watch and one as a belt. They will then go home and do usual daily activities while answering a brief daily activity diary for approximately 2 weeks. The conclusion of the study will be over the telephone and include questions on the comfort and wearability of the device. The analysis of gait and physical activity as well as adherence and wearability will be looked across three different age groups 3-5, 6-11, and 12-17. COHORT B: Cohort B of the study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the Panoramic Bracelet and associated algorithms such as SleepPy and GaitPy compared to the GENEActiv device and to evaluate the comfort and wearability of the Panoramic Bracelet. The results of this study will enable the use of novel devices in future clinical trials measuring scratch and sleep. . In the lab at the first visit, we will ask participants to do activities such as walking on different surfaces as well as to roll a dice and move between different activity stations. They will then go home and do usual daily activities while wearing both devices in the same wrist at different times stipulated in the protocol, answering a brief daily activity and sleep diary for approximately 2 weeks. Cohort B includes questions on the comfort and wearability of the Panoramic device on Day 7 approximately. The conclusion of the study will be over the telephone.The analysis will be looked across three different age groups 3-5, 6-11, and 12-17

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
87

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2021

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 18, 2021

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 1, 2021

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 23, 2021

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 28, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 28, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 11, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 11, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

March 18, 2021

Results QC Date

October 21, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 25, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

COHORT A :GaitActivityActigraphyCOHORT B:Sleep

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (31)

  • Cohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Gait speed was the time taken to walk a specified distance. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Double support time referred to the phase during walking when both feet were in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Single support time referred to the time when only one limb was in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometery data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Stance duration was defined as the duration of time the foot is in contact with the ground in a step during gait. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Swing time was defined as the time during which the foot was not in contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Stride length was defined as the distance covered when two steps were taken, one with each foot. It was measured from the heel of one foot to the heel of same foot when it came into contact with the ground. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes of Day 1

  • Cohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Step duration was the period between the first contact of a foot and the first following contact of the contralateral foot. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit on Day 1 during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Cadence referred to the number of steps taken per minute during gait cycle. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM, GAITRite Walkway and ActiGraph Devices for Walk at Natural, Slow and Fast Speed Tasks

    Stride duration refers to the duration between successive heel contacts of the same foot. Participants had to walk on GAITRite walkway (20 feet\*3) wearing ActiGraph and APDM devices at participant's natural speed and at varied speeds. Natural speed was participant's self-chosen pace for 3 rounds. Varied speeds included participant's self-chosen slow pace ("Walk slow") and fast pace ("Walk fast") for 3 rounds. Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from GAITRite walkway and APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Double Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Double support time referred to the phase during walking when both feet were in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Single Limb Support Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Single support time referred to the time when only one limb was in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Stance Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Stance duration was defined as the duration of time the foot is in contact with the ground in a step during gait. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Swing Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Swing duration was defined as the time during which the foot was not in contact with the ground. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Stride Length Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Stride length was defined as the distance covered when two steps were taken, one with each foot. It was measured from the heel of one foot to the heel of same foot when it came into contact with the ground. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Step Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Step duration was the period between the first contact of a foot and the first following contact of the contralateral foot. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-lab simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Cadence Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Cadence referred to the number of steps taken per minute during gait cycle. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Gait Speed Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Gait speed was the time taken to walk a specified distance. Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Total Number of Steps Measured by APDM, ActiGraph Lumbar and ActiGraph Wrist for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Participants had a single in-laboratory visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Stride Duration Measured by APDM and ActiGraph Lumbar for In-lab Simulated Activities

    Stride duration refers to the duration between successive heel contacts of the same foot. Participants had a single in-lab visit during which they performed gait monitoring procedures. For in-laboratory simulated activities, participants were required to alternate between activity blocks through a random path created by dice roll while wearing devices. Activities were done for approximately 20 minutes (approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 1\], approximately 5 minutes of break and approximately 7 minutes of activities \[activity block 2\]). Activities: 2 sitting (e.g., look through a book, draw/write), 2 standing (e.g., turn a switch or hang a coat), 2 walking (e.g., move blocks/objects, toss a beanbag and pick it up). Raw accelerometry data collected by ActiGraph devices (comparator) was processed by the GaitPy algorithm to generate gait quality metrics (lumbar position). Gait metrics data was directly extracted from APDM sensors (reference).

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort B: Total Sleep Time During the At-Home Period

    Total sleep time for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's total sleep opportunity (TSO) window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

    From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  • Cohort B: Percentage of Time Asleep During the At-Home Period

    The percentage of time asleep for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

    From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  • Cohort B: Number of Wake Bouts During the At-Home Period

    Number of wake bouts for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

    From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  • Cohort B: Sleep Onset Latency During the At-Home Period

    Sleep onset latency which is time to transition from full wakefulness to sleep, for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

    From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  • Cohort B: Wake After Sleep Onset During the At-Home Period

    Wake after sleep onset is time for which participants were awake after having initially fallen asleep, for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

    From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  • Cohort B: Total Scratch Duration During the At-Home Period

    Total scratch duration for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

    From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  • Cohort B: Total Scratch Episodes During the At-Home Period

    Total scratch episodes for GeneActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the SleepPy algorithm. SleepPy algorithm was used for detecting a participant's TSO window and computing sleep metrics within that window.

    From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  • Cohort B: Number of Available Minutes During the At-Home Period

    Available minutes represented any recorded accelerometer data per day per device in minutes. Number of available minutes for GENEActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the in-house built Sci-kit Digital Health (SKDH) package.

    From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  • Cohort B: Number of Minutes of Wear During the At-Home Period

    Number of minutes of wear include the total number of minutes the device is worn including sleep time and awake time. The wear time parameter (number of minutes of wear) for GENEActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the in-house built SKDH package.

    From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  • Cohort B: Number of Wear Minutes While Awake During the At-Home Period

    The wear time parameter (number of wear minutes while awake) for GENEActiv and Panoramic Bracelet was derived by the in-house built SKDH package.

    From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days) for Panoramic Bracelet; Day 7 (+ 2 days) to Day 15 (+ 2 days) for GENEActiv

  • Cohort B: Number of Participants According to Response to At-home Wearability/Comfort Questionnaire for Panoramic Bracelet Device at Day 7

    Wearability/comfort questionnaire included a total of 10 items for which the participants (12 to 17 years) or their caregivers (participants aged 3 to 11 years) were required to provide a response on a scale of 0 to 4, where 0 = strongly disagree, and 4 = strongly agree, higher scores indicated more comfort, except for questions 5 ("The device changes the way I move") and 6 ("The device changes the way I behave") , where 0 = strongly agree and 4 = strongly disagree, higher scores indicate more comfort. Number of participants according to response to each item of the wearability/comfort questionnaire is reported.

    Day 7

  • Cohort A: Number of Days to Complete Enrollment

    Number of days to complete enrollment corresponded to the total number of days it took to enroll all study participants within the age groups of 3-5 years, 6-11 years and 12-17 years.

    Up to approximately 8 months

Secondary Outcomes (27)

  • Cohort A: Number of Participants Enrolled Over Time

    Up to approximately 8 months

  • Cohort A: Number of Participants Able to Perform Each of the 7 Lab-Based Tasks

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Percentage of Tasks Completed (From a Total of 7 Tasks)

    Up to 20 minutes on Day 1

  • Cohort A: Number of Hours Per Day Wearing the Lumbar and Wrist Devices

    From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days)

  • Cohort A: Number of Days With More Than 10 Hours of Wear Time for Lumbar Device

    From Day 1 to Day 15 (+ 3 days)

  • +22 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Ages 3-5

COHORT A and B

Device: COHORT A: ActigraphDevice: Panoramic Bracelet and GENEActiv

Ages 6-11

COHORT A and B

Device: COHORT A: ActigraphDevice: Panoramic Bracelet and GENEActiv

Ages 12-17

COHORT A and B

Device: COHORT A: ActigraphDevice: Panoramic Bracelet and GENEActiv

Interventions

The ActiGraph CentrePoint Insight Watch is a small worn activity monitor designed for documenting physical movement associated with applications in physiological monitoring.

Ages 12-17Ages 3-5Ages 6-11

Panoramic Bracelet: The Panoramic Digital Health Bracelet is a wearable inertial measurement unit "intended for use by researchers and healthcare professionals for high frequency or continuous collection of physical data in home and professional healthcare settings during research studies." It includes a 3 axis accelerometer and gyroscope, as well as magnetometer, pressure, and temperature sensors. The bracelet has no interface or screen for participants to interact with. GENEActiv: The GENEActiv device is a wearable inertial measurement unit "designed for public health research and clinical trials." The device is a circular unit with attachable wrist-bands, and has no interface or screen for participants to interact with. The GENEActiv device is FDA 510(k) exempt. The device records acceleration data and can collect data remotely for up to 1 month.

Ages 12-17Ages 3-5Ages 6-11

Eligibility Criteria

Age3 Years - 17 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Healthy children and adolescents aged 3-17.

You may qualify if:

  • Ambulatory
  • No significant health problems that would impair the completion of the physical activity tasks, does not carry any diagnosis of developmental delay and/or significant co-morbid medical conditions as determined by a medically qualified individual during medical history review

You may not qualify if:

  • Participation in other studies involving digital devices within 1 week and/or treatment with an investigational drug (Phases 1-4) within 30 days or 5 half-lives before the current study begins and/or during study participation.
  • Participants with implanted medical devices.
  • Minor participants who reach the age of majority during the study, as recognized under local law.
  • Any medical or psychiatric condition that may increase the risk of study participation or, in the investigator's judgment, make the participant inappropriate for the study.
  • Participants with known allergies to components as specified by device manufacturer if applicable (eg, plastic, stainless steel and silicone).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Pfizer Innovation Research, PfIRe, Lab

Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Di J, Tuttle PG, Adamowicz L, Lin W, Zhang H, Psaltos D, Selig J, Bai J, Karahanoglu FI, Sheriff P, Seelam V, Williams B, Ghafoor S, Demanuele C, Santamaria M, Cai X. Monitoring Activity and Gait in Children (MAGIC) using digital health technologies. Pediatr Res. 2024 Aug;96(3):750-758. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03147-x. Epub 2024 Mar 21.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Motor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Results Point of Contact

Title
Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
Organization
Pfizer Inc.

Study Officials

  • Pfizer CT.gov Call Center

    Pfizer

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2021

First Posted

April 1, 2021

Study Start

August 23, 2021

Primary Completion

October 28, 2024

Study Completion

October 28, 2024

Last Updated

December 11, 2025

Results First Posted

December 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Locations