Cooled RFA vs Conventional RFA to Manage Chronic Facetogenic Low Back Pain
Lumbar CvS
A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Single-Blind Clinical Trial Comparing COOLIEF* Cooled Radiofrequency to Conventional Radiofrequency Ablation of the Medial Branch Nerves in the Management of Chronic Facetogenic Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
79
1 country
10
Brief Summary
This study is being conducted to assess the relative effectiveness of radiofrequency neurotomy in subjects with chronic axial low back pain originating in the lumbar facet joints using the COOLIEF\* Cooled Radiofrequency Probe as compared to the same procedure conducted using a Standard Radiofrequency Probe.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 23, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 12, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2023
CompletedJune 30, 2022
June 1, 2022
1.9 years
March 12, 2021
June 28, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The proportion of subjects whose back pain is reduced by ≥ 50 percent based on the NRS scale at 6 Months
The NRS is an 11-point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals "no pain" and 10 points equals "worst pain". There are no sub-scales.
6 months
Proportion of subjects experiencing adverse events through 6-months
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
The mean change in SF-36 Physical Functioning (PF) score from baseline to the 6-month visit
6 months
The mean change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score from baseline to the 6-month visit
6 months
The measured Global Perceived Effect scale at the 6-month visit
6 months
The mean change in EQ-5D-5L score from baseline to the 6-month visit
6 months
The proportion of subjects requiring additional intervention for their back pain during the 6-month period
6 months
Other Outcomes (7)
The proportion of subjects whose back pain is reduced by ≥ 50 percent based on the NRS scale at 12 Months
12 months
Proportion of subjects experiencing adverse events through 12 months
12 months
The mean change in SF-36 Physical Functioning (PF) score from baseline to the 12-month visit
12 months
- +4 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cooled Radiofrequency
EXPERIMENTALCooled radiofrequency energy will be delivered to target medial branch nerves in the lower back to reduce pain
Conventional Radiofrequency
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional radiofrequency energy will be delivered to target medial branch nerves in the lower back to reduce pain
Interventions
Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via cooled radiofrequency probe
Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via standard or conventional radiofrequency probe
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 21 years
- Able to understand the informed consent form and provide written informed consent and able to complete outcome measures.
- Subjects who have chronic axial (non-radicular) low back pain (at least 3 months) attributed to bilateral L4/L5, L5/S1 lumbar facet joint arthropathy based on clinical evaluation (paraspinal tenderness in the absence of signs and symptoms suggestive of focal neurological deficits) despite conservative treatments, including activity modification, home exercise, protective weight bearing, and/or analgesics (for example, acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs \[NSAIDs\]).
- Positive response to dual diagnostic medial branch blocks (defined as a decrease in numeric pain scores of at least 80% for a min of 3 hours for bupivacaine and minimum of 2 hours for lidocaine) using 0.5mL or less of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine, on respective encounters on separate days, at each of the appropriate medial branches.
- Usual/Average Pain ≥ 6 on an 11-point NRS scale.
- Analgesics including membrane stabilizers such as Neurontin (gabapentin) and antidepressants for pain, such as Cymbalta (duloxetine), must be clinically stable (defined as stable dosage for ≥ 6 weeks prior to the screening visit) and shall not change during the study without approval of the investigator.
- Agree to see one physician (study physician) for back pain during the study period.
- Subjects of child bearing potential must be willing to utilize double barrier contraceptive method for duration of participation.
- Willingness to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration of the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Evidence of inflammatory arthritis (example, rheumatoid arthritis) or other systemic condition (example; gout, fibromyalgia, MS, Lupus, etc.) that could cause pain.
- Focal neurologic signs or symptoms.
- Spinal pathology that may impede recovery such as spina bifida occulta, grade II or higher spondylolisthesis at an affected joint or adjacent level, or significant lumbar scoliosis (sagittal vertical axis angle \>5 degrees or Cobb Angle \>10 degrees).
- Suspected mechanical instability based on flexion/extension and/or films at the proposed treatment levels
- History of prior lumbar fusion or previous lumbar back surgery at the intended treatment levels.
- Progressive motor deficit, and/or clinical signs of cauda equina or polyradiculopathy.
- Radiologic evidence of a symptomatic herniated disc or nerve root impingement.
- Symptomatic moderate or severe foramina or central canal stenosis demonstrating radicular symptoms or neurogenic claudication.
- Evidence of neuropathic pain affecting the lower back.
- Intra-articular steroid injection at target levels within 90 days from randomization.
- Platelet rich plasma (PRP) or stem cells at target levels within 180 days from randomization.
- Prior lumbar radiofrequency neurotomy of the L3/L4, L4/L5 medial branches and/or L5/S1dorsal ramus.
- Body mass index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m2
- Extremely thin patients and those with minimal subcutaneous tissue thickness that would not accommodate a radiofrequency lesion of up to 14 mm in diameter to limit the risk of skin burns.
- Pending or active compensation claim, litigation, or disability remuneration (e.g. disability, worker's compensation, auto injury in litigation or pending litigation).
- +12 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Avanos Medicallead
Study Sites (10)
International Spine & Pain Performance Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20006, United States
Millennium Pain Center
Bloomington, Illinois, 61704, United States
Ochsner Baptist Medical Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115, United States
Premier Pain Centers
Shrewsbury, New Jersey, 07702, United States
The Center for Clinical Research
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
University Orthopedics Center
Altoona, Pennsylvania, 16602, United States
Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care
Sewickley, Pennsylvania, 15143, United States
University Orthopedics Center
State College, Pennsylvania, 16801, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, United States
The Spine and Nerve Centers of St. Francis Hosptial
Charleston, West Virginia, 25301, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Provenzano
Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The study is a participant-blinded trial and deliberate action, utilizing a physical barrier, will be taken to ensure the blind remains intact.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 12, 2021
First Posted
March 17, 2021
Study Start
February 23, 2021
Primary Completion
January 1, 2023
Study Completion
July 1, 2023
Last Updated
June 30, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06