ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Evaluation
RESTORE
1 other identifier
interventional
203
1 country
28
Brief Summary
This study is a prospective, randomized study comparing ReActiv8 Therapy to Optimal Medical Management (OMM).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
28 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 14, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 4, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 13, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 5, 2026
CompletedJanuary 23, 2026
January 1, 2026
3.1 years
March 14, 2021
March 3, 2025
January 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Comparison of 1-year change from baseline in ODI between Treatment and Control with MMRM for missing data. ODI is measured on a scale of 0 to 100 where a lower score is a better outcome.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Low Back Pain Numerical Rating Scale (LBP NRS)
1 year
Change in EQ-5D
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Treatment (ReActiv8)
ACTIVE COMPARATORMarket-approved ReActiv8 device
Control (OMM)
NO INTERVENTIONOptimized medical management (OMM) (Standard of Care)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥21 years
- Evidence of lumbar multifidus muscle dysfunction
- Intractable Chronic Low Back Pain that has persisted \>6 months resulting in pain most of the days in the past 12 months
- Failed therapy including pain medications and physical therapy
- Not a candidate for spine surgery
- Low Back Pain NRS of ≥6 and ≤9
- Oswestry Disability Index score ≥30 and ≤60
- Willing and capable of giving Informed Consent
- Able to comply with this protocol
- On Optimal Medical Management per the Investigator
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindicated for the ReActiv8 System
- BMI \> 35
- Any surgical correction procedure for scoliosis at any time, or a current clinical diagnosis of moderate to severe scoliosis
- An independent MRI assessment identifying a pathology that is likely the cause of the CLBP and is amenable to surgery
- Leg pain described as being worse than back pain, or radiculopathy (neuropathic pain) below the knee
- Any condition unrelated to CLBP which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could limit physical movement or compliance with the protocol, or interfere with the assessment of efficacy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mainstay Medicallead
Study Sites (28)
Barrow Brain & Spine
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013, United States
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205, United States
SoCal Sport and Spine
Newport Beach, California, 92660, United States
Pacific Research Institute
Santa Rosa, California, 95403, United States
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
International Spine, Pain and Performance Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20006, United States
Cleveland Clinic Martin Health Tradition Hospital
Port Saint Lucie, Florida, 34986, United States
Cantor Spine Center and Paley Orthopedic Spine Institute
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33407, United States
Augusta Orthopedic & Sports Medicine Specialists
Augusta, Georgia, 30909, United States
Horizon Clinical Research
Fayetteville, Georgia, 30214, United States
Vista Clinical Research
Newnan, Georgia, 30265, United States
Indiana Spine Group
Carmel, Indiana, 46032, United States
OrthoIndy
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46278, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States
Advent Health Shawnee Mission
Shawnee Mission, Kansas, 66204, United States
Columbia Orthopedic Group
Columbia, Missouri, 65201, United States
SSM Health Medical Group
Jefferson City, Missouri, 65109, United States
Freeman Hospital
Joplin, Missouri, 64804, United States
Northwell Health
Great Neck, New York, 11021, United States
Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management
New York, New York, 10022, United States
OrthoCarolina Sports Medicine Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
The Center for Clinical Research, LLC
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
University Hospitals Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Pacific Sports and Spine
Eugene, Oregon, 97401, United States
Spinal Diagnostics, PC
Tualatin, Oregon, 97062, United States
Center for Interventional Pain and Spine
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17601, United States
Related Publications (2)
Gilligan C, Burnside D, Grant L, Yong RJ, Mullins PM, Schwab F, Mekhail N. ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs. Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Intractable Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain (RESTORE Trial Protocol). Pain Ther. 2023 Apr;12(2):607-620. doi: 10.1007/s40122-023-00475-4. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
PMID: 36787013BACKGROUNDSchwab F, Mekhail N, Patel KV, Langhorst M, Heros RD, Gentile J, Costandi S, Moore G, Gilmore C, Manion S, Chakravarthy K, Meyer SC, Bundy JV, Tate JL, Sanders R, Vaid S, Szentirmai O, Goree J, Patel VV, Lehmen J, Desai MJ, Pope JE, Giuffrida A, Hayek S, Virk SS, Paicius R, Klemme WR, Levy R, Gilligan C; RESTORE investigators. Restorative Neurostimulation Therapy Compared to Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Evaluation (RESTORE) for the Treatment of Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain due to Multifidus Dysfunction. Pain Ther. 2025 Feb;14(1):401-423. doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00689-0. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
PMID: 39812968RESULT
Limitations and Caveats
Participants were not blinded to their treatment, and as a result, those randomized to the control arm may have experienced a nocebo effect underestimating the clinical effect of OMM. In addition, patients in the treatment arm may have experienced a placebo effect after being randomized to interventional treatment.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jennifer Tinsley, Director of Clinical Affairs
- Organization
- Mainstay Medical
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Frank Schwab
New York-Presbyterian
- STUDY CHAIR
Chris Gilligan
Brigham and Women's Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Kiran Patel
Northwell Health
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2021
First Posted
March 17, 2021
Study Start
July 14, 2021
Primary Completion
September 4, 2024
Study Completion
January 5, 2026
Last Updated
January 23, 2026
Results First Posted
April 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share