Success Metrics

Clinical Success Rate
100.0%

Based on 3 completed trials

Completion Rate
100%(3/3)
Active Trials
1(13%)
Results Posted
67%(2 trials)

Phase Distribution

Ph not_applicable
7
88%
Ph phase_4
1
13%

Phase Distribution

0

Early Stage

0

Mid Stage

1

Late Stage

Phase Distribution8 total trials
Phase 4Post-market surveillance
1(12.5%)
N/ANon-phased studies
7(87.5%)

Highest Phase Reached

Phase 4

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

100.0%

3 of 3 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

1

trials recruiting

Total Trials

8

all time

Status Distribution
Active(3)
Completed(3)
Other(2)

Detailed Status

Completed3
Not yet recruiting2
unknown2
Recruiting1

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
8
Active
1
Success Rate
100.0%
Most Advanced
Phase 4

Trials by Phase

Phase 41 (12.5%)
N/A7 (87.5%)

Trials by Status

completed338%
not_yet_recruiting225%
unknown225%
recruiting113%

Recent Activity

1 active trials
Showing 5 of 8
recruitingnot_applicable

Cryoneurolysis Versus Radiofrequency in Knee Osteoarthritis

NCT07664371
not_yet_recruitingnot_applicable

Comparison Between Traditional Bipolar Radiofrequency and Cooled Radiofrequency in Sacroiliac Joint Pain Patients

NCT07749599
not_yet_recruitingnot_applicable

Interventions for the Management of Perineal Cancer Pain

NCT06392399
completednot_applicable

Cooled Radiofrequency vs. Hyaluronic Acid to Manage Knee Pain

NCT03381248
completednot_applicable

Coolief Cooled Radiofrequency vs. Conventional Radiofrequency to Manage OA Knee Pain

NCT04145011
View all 8 trials

Clinical Trials (8)

Showing 8 of 8 trials
NCT07664371Not Applicable

Cryoneurolysis Versus Radiofrequency in Knee Osteoarthritis

Recruiting
NCT07749599Not Applicable

Comparison Between Traditional Bipolar Radiofrequency and Cooled Radiofrequency in Sacroiliac Joint Pain Patients

Not Yet Recruiting
NCT06392399Not Applicable

Interventions for the Management of Perineal Cancer Pain

Not Yet Recruiting
NCT03381248Not Applicable

Cooled Radiofrequency vs. Hyaluronic Acid to Manage Knee Pain

Completed
NCT04145011Not Applicable

Coolief Cooled Radiofrequency vs. Conventional Radiofrequency to Manage OA Knee Pain

Completed
NCT04803149Not Applicable

Cooled RFA vs Conventional RFA to Manage Chronic Facetogenic Low Back Pain

Unknown
NCT03985280Phase 4

Radiofrequency Versus Intraarticular Local Anesthestic and Steroids Injection for Chronic Hip Pain.

Unknown
NCT02343003Not Applicable

Nerve Ablation by Cooled Radiofrequency Compared to Corticosteroid Injection for Management of Knee Pain

Completed

All 8 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
DEVICE
Total Trials
8