DBS of the SCC for the Treatment of Medically Refractory CLBP
Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subgenual Cingulate Cortex for the Treatment of Medically Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of deep brain stimulation of the subgenual cingulate cortex for the treatment of chronic medically-refractory low back pain using a randomized double-blind crossover design.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 30, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 11, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2027
July 10, 2025
July 1, 2025
6.2 years
August 30, 2019
July 7, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change of at least 50% in pain scores on the visual analog scale (VAS) compared to baseline.
The visual analog scale for pain is a continuous horizontal scale of length 100 mm with the extremes of pain expressed on either end (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain). The change on the VAS from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
12 months - the end of the crossover period
Change in at least 50% in pain scores on the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale -- Short Form 20 (PASS SF-20) compared to baseline.
The PASS SF-20 score is a composite 20 item score which focuses on fear and anxiety of pain. It includes 4 sections on aspects of pain including cognitive, escape/avoidance, fear and physiological anxiety. All items are rated on a scale from 0 (never) to 5 (always), where higher values indicate worse outcome. Summary scores are calculated by summing assigned items and then by summing the subscales to derive an overall score for a possible total of 100. The change on the PASS from active stimulation compared to baseline and sham stimulation will be calculated.
12 months - the end of the crossover period
At least 10% of study participants to experience one or more significant adverse events (SAEs)
The percentage of subjects with one or more SAEs during the entire study period will be calculated.
18 months - the end of the study
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Change in dose and/or frequency of opioid analgesic medication use in oral morphine equivalents.
12 months - the end of the crossover period
50% improvement in McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)
12 months - the end of the crossover period
Change in Short-Form 36 (SF-36) quality of life questionnaire score.
12 months - the end of the crossover period
Change in EuroQol 5-Domain (EQ-5D) Score
12 months - the end of the crossover period
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score (MoCA)
12 months - the end of the crossover period
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Active Stimulation
EXPERIMENTALPatients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups: Active Treatment (active stimulation programmed to the settings found to be optimal during the initial open-label period) and a Control Group (sham stimulation - IPG is set to ON but the voltage is set to 0V).
Sham Stimulation
SHAM COMPARATORPatients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups: Active Treatment (active stimulation programmed to the settings found to be optimal during the initial open-label phase) and a Control Group (sham stimulation - IPG is set to ON but the voltage is set to 0V).
Interventions
The Abbott Infinity DBS device will be surgically implanted in the bilateral subgenual cingulate cortex to provide electrical stimulation to this region.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pain secondary to failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) as defined by persistent low back pain despite prior surgical interventions.
- Self-reported average back pain intensity of greater than 8 out of 10 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) documented over greater than 2 years.
- Failure to achieve at least 50% pain relief from a trial of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) or less than 50% pain relief after 3 months of SCS therapy or patient refuses/rejects SCS trial
- Failure to achieve at least 50% pain relief in response to at least 4 weeks of physical therapy.
- Failure to achieve at least 50% pain relief in response to at least 2 percutaneous spinal pain procedures.
- Failure to achieve at least 50% pain relief in response to 3 months of opioid therapy (at least 20 MEQ/day) or inability to increase or tolerate opioid therapy due to dose-limiting side effects).
- Failure to achieve at least 50% pain relief in response to a 3-month trial of at least one other class of pain medication in addition to opioid therapy or inability to tolerate increasing doses of non-opioid pain medications due to dose-limiting side effects.
- Lack of a surgically correctible etiology for the pain as determined by 2 independent neurosurgeons
- Age greater than 40 years of age.
- Ability to give informed consent in accordance with institutional policies and participate in the 1.5-year follow-up, involving assessments and stimulator adjustments.
- Willingness to share unexpected neurological or psychiatric symptoms with study clinicians.
You may not qualify if:
- Significant neurocognitive impairment (MoCA \< 26).
- Age \> 75 years.
- History of implant-related infection.
- History of bleeding disorder or immune-compromise.
- Psychiatric comorbidity other than depression or generalized anxiety disorder, as determined by MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview.
- Patients with neurological diagnoses that may reduce the response to or increase the risk of DBS including neurodegenerative conditions, severe movement disorders, demyelinating disorders, syringomyelia, epilepsy or history of seizures, history of CNS tumors (spinal and/or cranial), history of serious head injury with loss of consciousness, history of stroke, surgically reversible peripheral pain syndromes including surgically correctable radiculopathy, and severe peripheral neuropathy.
- Patients who have undergone spine surgery within the previous 3 months.
- Major medical co-morbidities increasing the risk of surgery including uncontrolled hypertension, severe diabetes, major organ system failure, history of hemorrhagic stroke, need for chronic anticoagulation, active infection, immunocompromised state or malignancy with \< 5 years life expectancy.
- Individuals with a currently implanted SCS device.
- Individuals with a life expectancy less than 1 year due to any cause.
- Individuals involved in an injury claim under current litigation.
- Individuals with a pending or approved worker's compensation claim.
- Patient living greater than 100 miles from UCLA.
- Suicide attempt in the last two years and/or presence of a suicide plan (an answer of Yes to Question C4 in Section C- Suicidality of MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview).
- Alcohol or illicit substance use disorder (other than nicotine) within the last 6 months, unstable remission of substance abuse, or chart evidence that co-morbid substance use disorder could account for lack of treatment response.
- +9 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
University of California Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90067, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ausaf Bari, MD PhD
UCLA Department of Neurosurgery
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 30, 2019
First Posted
September 11, 2019
Study Start
May 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Last Updated
July 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share