NCT04722120

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the image quality and clinical feasibility of double low-dose liver computed tomography using a deep-learning-based iodine contrast boosting algorithm in participants at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
68

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Typical duration for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 8, 2016

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2018

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2021

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 25, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

February 14, 2022

Status Verified

January 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

September 8, 2016

Last Update Submit

January 29, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

CT

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Detection rate of solid focal lesion in liver

    diagnostic performance

    12 months after last patient's image work up

  • Quantitative image quality analysis

    Contrast-to-Noise

    Immediate after study enrollement

Study Arms (2)

Conventional liver CT

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Underwent conventional liver CT on HCC high-risk patient

Radiation: Conventional CT (radiation)Drug: Conventional CT (contrast agent)

Double low dose CT

EXPERIMENTAL

Underwent double low dose liver CT with 30% lower radiation dose and 20% contrast media on HCC high-risk patient

Radiation: Low radiation dose CTDrug: Low contrast dose CTOther: Deep-learning based contrast boosting algorithms

Interventions

Underwent liver CT with 30% lower radiation dose

Double low dose CT

Underwent liver CT without change of radiation.

Conventional liver CT

Underwent liver CT 20% lower dose contrast media.

Also known as: Low contrast medium dosage
Double low dose CT

Underwent liver CT without change of contrast media doses.

Also known as: Standard contrast medium dosage
Conventional liver CT

Applied deep-learning based contrast boosting algorithms on acquired CT images

Double low dose CT

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Liver cirrhosis
  • Tumor marker (aFP, PIVKA) elevation
  • Nodular lesion on USG
  • Received RFA for HCC

You may not qualify if:

  • hypersensitivity at iodine
  • GFR under 30
  • BMI over 30
  • Nursing or pregnant women
  • enrolled the other study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, South Korea

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Interventions

Congresses as TopicRadiationContrast Media

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AdenocarcinomaCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteDigestive System DiseasesLiver Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OrganizationsHealth Care Economics and OrganizationsPhysical PhenomenaDiagnostic Uses of ChemicalsPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesSpecialty Uses of Chemicals

Study Officials

  • Jeong Min Lee, MD

    Seoul National University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
Participants, investigators, and outcome assessors were all masked to the allocation
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2016

First Posted

January 25, 2021

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion

January 1, 2018

Study Completion

January 1, 2021

Last Updated

February 14, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations