Bipolar RFA Using Twin ICW Electrodes vs. Switching Monopolar RFA for Recurrent HCC
Radiofrequency Ablation Using Internally Cooled Wet Electrodes in Bipolar Mode for the Treatment of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Locoregional Treatment: A Randomized Prospective Comparative Study
1 other identifier
interventional
77
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study was conducted to provide preliminary data for the main trial to compare efficacy between bipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using twin internally cooled-wet electrodes and switching monopolar RFA using separable clustered electrodes in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after locoregional treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma
Started May 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 16, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 16, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 12, 2019
CompletedApril 7, 2020
April 1, 2020
3 years
January 14, 2019
April 3, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Minimum diameter of ablation zone per unit time
Minimum diameter of ablative zone per unit time on post-RFA CT or MRI in a mm.
3 days after RFA
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Technique efficacy
1 month after RFA
IDR rate
12 months, 24 months after RFA
EM rate
12 months, 24 months after RFA
Local tumor progression (LTP)
12 months, 24 months after RFA
Other Outcomes (3)
Complication
1 month after RFA
Volume of ablative zone
3 days after RFA
Ablation time
1 day
Study Arms (2)
TICW-RFA
ACTIVE COMPARATORBipolar RFA using twin internally cooled-wet electrodes
SC-RFA
ACTIVE COMPARATORSwitching monopolar RFA using separable clustered electrodes
Interventions
Saline-enhanced twin internally cooled electrodes allow intratumoral injection of a saline solution during the application of the RF current that alters the tissue conductivity
A separable clustered electrode is similar to a clustered electrode, although it differs from a conventional clustered electrode in that each individual electrode is separable.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- radiologic or pathologic diagnosis of HCC recurrence after locoregional treatment
- HCC nodules measuring 1 cm or larger and smaller than 5 cm
You may not qualify if:
- more than three HCC nodules
- tumors with major vascular invasion or abutment to the central portal or hepatic vein with a diameter \> 5mm
- extrahepatic metastasis
- Child-Pugh class C
- severe coagulopathy (platelet cell count of less than 50,000 cells/mm3 or prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT-INR) prolongation of more than 50 %)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
Choi JW, Lee JM, Lee DH, Yoon JH, Kim YJ, Lee JH, Yu SJ, Cho EJ. Radiofrequency ablation using internally cooled wet electrodes in bipolar mode for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after locoregional treatment: A randomized prospective comparative study. PLoS One. 2020 Sep 28;15(9):e0239733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239733. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32986758DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeong Min Lee, MD
Seoul National University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2019
First Posted
January 16, 2019
Study Start
May 16, 2015
Primary Completion
May 16, 2018
Study Completion
February 12, 2019
Last Updated
April 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share