Dual Task Training for Cerebellar Ataxia
The Role of Integrated Cognitive and Balance (Dual-task) Training in Balance and Fall Risk in Individuals With Cerebellar Ataxia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Combining cognitive training with physical training to improve balance is a new approach for reducing the risk of falls in patient populations who are at risk for falls. People with brain pathology including cerebellar ataxia (CA) have difficulty in performing dual-tasks. Deficiency in dual-task performance relative to single-task performance referred to as dual-task cost is high in CA. Due to the high demands on cognitive resources, people with CA have higher falls rates during activities that involve dual tasking. Tai-Chi involves both cognition and physical movements making it a dual-tasking activity. However, previous study on the effects of 12-weeks of 8-form Tai-Chi did not demonstrate that it had beneficial effects in reducing falls among CA population. This null finding could potentially be due to (1) the lower levels of cognitive demands of Tai-Chi exercise, (2) the intervention not being intensive enough, or (3) the intervention may not have targeted the specific symptoms of CA. To determine if adding structured cognitive demands to conventional balance and coordination training (i.e., addressing all three possibilities for our previous null findings), the investigaotrs conducted a pilot study (n=5) to evaluate the feasibility, safety and benefits of a Cognitive-coupled Intensive Balance Training (CIBT) program. The more intensive and focused CIBT intervention reduced dual-task cost, improved balance, and reduced the number of falls in a sample of individuals with CA. Important next steps is to (1) evaluate the efficacy of the CIBT in a fully powered clinical trial, (2) understand the mechanisms underlying the benefits of CIBT training, and (3) determine the cost-benefits of this intervention. The hypothesis for the study includes (1) CIBT will improve balance and reduce falls; (2) reduction in dual-task cost of balance and cognitive performance will mediate a reduction in the number of falls in CA and (3) CIBT will be a cost-effective treatment option for improving balance and reduce falls. To test these hypotheses, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with economic evaluation will be conducted over a period of two years to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dual-task (CIBT) training compared with single-task (conventional balance: active control) training in individuals with CA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 11, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2022
CompletedMay 11, 2022
October 1, 2020
1.2 years
November 11, 2020
May 10, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Dual-task cost of balance performance will be assessed for the TUG
Based on the scores of the standard TUG (single task), d-TUG (dual-task TUG) test and standard counting backwards, the dual-task cost of balance performance will be estimated using the formula: (d-TUG - Standard TUG)/ Standard-TUG) × 100.
0 weeks
Dual-task cost of balance performance will be assessed for the TUG
Based on the scores of the standard TUG (single task), d-TUG (dual-task TUG) test and standard counting backwards, the dual-task cost of balance performance will be estimated using the formula: (d-TUG - Standard TUG)/ Standard-TUG) × 100.
Change score at 10 weeks and 34 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
SOT
0 weeks, 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 34 weeks
Limits of stability (LOS)
0 weeks, 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 34 weeks
Number of falls
0 weeks, 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 34 weeks
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA),
0 weeks, 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 34 weeks
Scale for the Assessment & Rating of Ataxia (SARA)
0 weeks, 6 weeks, 10 weeks and 34 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Dual-task group
EXPERIMENTALDual-task (CIBT- experimental) group participants will receive 10 minutes of warm up, 40 minutes of CIBT training and 10 minutes of cool down exercises. CIBT program includes performing four types of cognitive tasks during sit to stand, standing with feet apart, one leg, tandem standing, multidirectional reaching, stair climbing and walking (10 metres) tasks. The four cognitive tasks will include: counting backwards by subtracting 4 numbers (for mental tracking ), naming fruits, vegetables, or animals (for working memory), auditory cues for performing activities, example, perform heel raise when you hear the alphabet H (for improving attention and auditory discrimination), short story telling (for verbal fluency). In addition, falls prevention strategies will be taught.
Single-task group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSingle-task (conventional balance, coordination and cognitive training- active control) group participants will receive 10 minutes of warm-up, 20 minutes of conventional balance and coordination exercises that are in accordance to previously published literature, 20 minutes of cognitive training as single-task (same 4 tasks provided for the CIBT) and 10 minutes of cool down. In addition, falls prevention strategies will also be taught.
Interventions
Dual-task (CIBT- experimental) group participants will receive 10 minutes of warm up, 40 minutes of CIBT training and 10 minutes of cool down exercises. CIBT program includes performing four types of cognitive tasks during sit to stand, standing with feet apart, one leg, tandem standing, multidirectional reaching, stair climbing and walking (10 metres) tasks. The four cognitive tasks will include: counting backwards by subtracting 4 numbers (for mental tracking ), naming fruits, vegetables, or animals (for working memory), auditory cues for performing activities, example, perform heel raise when you hear the alphabet H (for improving attention and auditory discrimination), short story telling (for verbal fluency). In addition, falls prevention strategies will be taught.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women in the age group of 18-60 years;
- Confirmed diagnosis of CA (of any type);
- Able to walk independently with or without walking assistive aids.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous history of other neurological diseases (such as Parkinson's disease, stroke, or polyneuropathies) or musculoskeletal problems severely impairing balance, gait or motor performance;
- Able to walk only with handheld support
- Severe visual impairment preventing from exercise participation and
- Severe cognitive impairment with scores \<16 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic Universitylead
- Chinese University of Hong Kongcollaborator
- National University of Singaporecollaborator
- University of Pittsburghcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Hung Hom, Kowloon, 00, Hong Kong
Related Publications (1)
Winser SJ, Chan AYY, Whitney SL, Chen CH, Pang MYC. Effectiveness and cost of integrated cognitive and balance training for balance and falls in cerebellar ataxia: a blinded two-arm parallel group RCT. Front Neurol. 2024 Jan 19;14:1267099. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1267099. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 38313407DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- A person not involved in the study (student helper #1) will randomize participants to study groups in permuted blocks through computer-generated random numbers list prepared by The student helper who is not involved in the recruitment, assessment of study variables, or intervention delivery will perform the allocation of participants into the experimental group and active control groups. One other part-time research assistant will be recruited to conduct all the other methodological procedures of the project (RA2). Assessments will be performed by a PhD student of the PI who is blind to treatment condition. Statistical analysis will be performed by the PI who will be blind to treatment condition during analyses.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 11, 2020
First Posted
December 1, 2020
Study Start
March 1, 2021
Primary Completion
April 30, 2022
Study Completion
April 30, 2022
Last Updated
May 11, 2022
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share