NCT04609371

Brief Summary

During pandemics older adults with chronic physical conditions are a particularly vulnerable population for unmet mental health needs. This is a consequence of a number of factors which include decreased access to their doctors because of restrictions in visits in order to decrease risk of disease transmission and because doctors are seconded to provide medical services in areas of high priority. Since Public Health authorities worry that pandemics may be a reality of the future, this study is being operationalized during the present COVID-19 pandemic in order to see what can be learned about different ways to provide mental health care under such constraints. The study offers evidence-based approaches to managing feelings of anxiety or depression that may have existed prior to the onset of a pandemic, or that have arisen during a pandemic. It uses principles of cognitive behavioural therapy in which participants are offered self-care tools to help them develop strategies for dealing with their various symptoms. These tools have already been shown by the team to be effective in other contexts in studies DIRECT-sc (Effectiveness of a supported self-care intervention for depression compared to an unsupported intervention in older adults with chronic physical illnesses) and CanDIRECT (Effectiveness of a telephone-supported depression self-care intervention for cancer survivors). The present study, PanDIRECT (Assisting Family Physicians with Gaps in Mental Health Care Generated by the COVID-19 Pandemic), aims to answer the following questions:

  1. 1.Can these tools be used in the community care of mental health problems during pandemics?
  2. 2.Are they acceptable to patients?
  3. 3.Using a randomized control trial, does lay-coaching of use of these tools improve their use and patient outcomes?
  4. 4.Do family practitioners value patient information sent to them at the end of the trial

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 19, 2020

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 21, 2020

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 30, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

September 21, 2021

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

October 19, 2020

Last Update Submit

September 20, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Consent rate

    Number of consenting participants out of total number contacted over the recruitment period

    At recruitment

  • Data completion rate

    Investigators will report on rates of missing data from baseline and follow-up questionnaires

    From recruitment launch to completion of follow-up (4 months)

  • Fidelity of intervention completion

    Logs and checklists will be used to evaluate completion of intervention, as per protocol

    A 8 week follow-up

  • Severity of depression symptoms

    Using the validated 9 item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Scores range from 0 to 27 - higher score indicates more severe depression

    At baseline

  • Severity of depression symptoms

    Using the validated 9 item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Scores range from 0 to 27 - higher score indicates more severe depression

    At 8 week follow-up

  • Severity of anxiety symptoms

    Using the validated 7 item General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) instrument. Scores range from 0 to 21 - higher score indicates more severe anxiety

    At baseline

  • Severity of anxiety symptoms

    Using the validated 7 item General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) instrument. Scores range from 0 to 21 - higher score indicates more severe anxiety

    At 8 week follow-up

  • Use of health care services

    Using questions developed by the team and administrative databases to assess use of hospital and mental health care services

    At baseline

  • Use of health care services

    Using questions developed by the team and administrative databases to assess use of hospital and mental health care services

    At 8 week follow-up

  • Use of the self-care materials

    Using adherence questions developed by the team, not scored

    At 8 week follow-up

Study Arms (2)

self-care tools

EXPERIMENTAL

Arms Assigned Interventions Experimental: self-care tools The tools are adapted from those successfully deployed in the DIRECTsc depression self-care project focusing on patients with depressive symptoms, but abbreviated to meet the needs of the proposed short-term intervention for a broader sample of patients to include those with anxiety symptoms and with minimal symptoms. Tools will include individual chapters of the Antidepressant Skills Workbook; the mood monitoring tool; a workbook on managing worry; relaxation audio files and information on exercise and healthy eating. In view of the short duration of the intervention (8 weeks), a maximum of 2 tools will be sent to each participant. An algorithm will determine which self-care tools, matched to the specific mental health symptoms reported by participants, will be sent to the participants.

Behavioral: self-care tools

coaching

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive the algorithm-determined self-care tools, matched to the specific mental health symptoms reported by participants as in the first arm. They will ALSO be offered up to 3 coach calls. Coaching by a trained lay coach will be structured and guided by a manual. Trained lay coaches will call participants in the week following delivery of the toolkit to guide them through the self-care toolkit over an 8-week period. Coaches will contact participants a maximum of 3 times, with calls expected to average 15-20 minutes. Call content will be guided by a structured coaching manual adapted from those used in the team's previous two RCTs of the self-care materials. The coaches will follow structured agendas, keep records of all contacts.

Behavioral: self-care toolsBehavioral: lay telephone coaching

Interventions

self-care toolsBEHAVIORAL

self-care tools only

coachingself-care tools

coaching

coaching

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • + years old
  • consented to be recontacted (participant in a previous study)

You may not qualify if:

  • moderate to severe cognitive impairment (using BOMC a brief cognitive screen) -unable to read in English or French (self-reported); hearing impairment (as judged by research staff);
  • currently receiving counseling or psychological therapy (as these treatments may conflict with the self-care interventions)
  • currently living in a long term care or other medicalized facility,
  • presenting suicidal intent (as identified through the final item of the PHQ-9 which will be asked at screening).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

St Mary's Hospital Research Centre

Montreal, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DepressionAnxiety Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehaviorMental Disorders

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University and Family physician, St. Mary's Hospital Center

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2020

First Posted

October 30, 2020

Study Start

October 21, 2020

Primary Completion

March 1, 2021

Study Completion

May 1, 2021

Last Updated

September 21, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations