PanDirect: Self-care Tools and Telephone Coaching for Depression and Anxiety During Pandemics
Assisting Family Physicians With Gaps in Mental Health Care Generated by the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
During pandemics older adults with chronic physical conditions are a particularly vulnerable population for unmet mental health needs. This is a consequence of a number of factors which include decreased access to their doctors because of restrictions in visits in order to decrease risk of disease transmission and because doctors are seconded to provide medical services in areas of high priority. Since Public Health authorities worry that pandemics may be a reality of the future, this study is being operationalized during the present COVID-19 pandemic in order to see what can be learned about different ways to provide mental health care under such constraints. The study offers evidence-based approaches to managing feelings of anxiety or depression that may have existed prior to the onset of a pandemic, or that have arisen during a pandemic. It uses principles of cognitive behavioural therapy in which participants are offered self-care tools to help them develop strategies for dealing with their various symptoms. These tools have already been shown by the team to be effective in other contexts in studies DIRECT-sc (Effectiveness of a supported self-care intervention for depression compared to an unsupported intervention in older adults with chronic physical illnesses) and CanDIRECT (Effectiveness of a telephone-supported depression self-care intervention for cancer survivors). The present study, PanDIRECT (Assisting Family Physicians with Gaps in Mental Health Care Generated by the COVID-19 Pandemic), aims to answer the following questions:
- 1.Can these tools be used in the community care of mental health problems during pandemics?
- 2.Are they acceptable to patients?
- 3.Using a randomized control trial, does lay-coaching of use of these tools improve their use and patient outcomes?
- 4.Do family practitioners value patient information sent to them at the end of the trial
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 19, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 30, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2021
CompletedSeptember 21, 2021
September 1, 2021
4 months
October 19, 2020
September 20, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Consent rate
Number of consenting participants out of total number contacted over the recruitment period
At recruitment
Data completion rate
Investigators will report on rates of missing data from baseline and follow-up questionnaires
From recruitment launch to completion of follow-up (4 months)
Fidelity of intervention completion
Logs and checklists will be used to evaluate completion of intervention, as per protocol
A 8 week follow-up
Severity of depression symptoms
Using the validated 9 item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Scores range from 0 to 27 - higher score indicates more severe depression
At baseline
Severity of depression symptoms
Using the validated 9 item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Scores range from 0 to 27 - higher score indicates more severe depression
At 8 week follow-up
Severity of anxiety symptoms
Using the validated 7 item General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) instrument. Scores range from 0 to 21 - higher score indicates more severe anxiety
At baseline
Severity of anxiety symptoms
Using the validated 7 item General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) instrument. Scores range from 0 to 21 - higher score indicates more severe anxiety
At 8 week follow-up
Use of health care services
Using questions developed by the team and administrative databases to assess use of hospital and mental health care services
At baseline
Use of health care services
Using questions developed by the team and administrative databases to assess use of hospital and mental health care services
At 8 week follow-up
Use of the self-care materials
Using adherence questions developed by the team, not scored
At 8 week follow-up
Study Arms (2)
self-care tools
EXPERIMENTALArms Assigned Interventions Experimental: self-care tools The tools are adapted from those successfully deployed in the DIRECTsc depression self-care project focusing on patients with depressive symptoms, but abbreviated to meet the needs of the proposed short-term intervention for a broader sample of patients to include those with anxiety symptoms and with minimal symptoms. Tools will include individual chapters of the Antidepressant Skills Workbook; the mood monitoring tool; a workbook on managing worry; relaxation audio files and information on exercise and healthy eating. In view of the short duration of the intervention (8 weeks), a maximum of 2 tools will be sent to each participant. An algorithm will determine which self-care tools, matched to the specific mental health symptoms reported by participants, will be sent to the participants.
coaching
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive the algorithm-determined self-care tools, matched to the specific mental health symptoms reported by participants as in the first arm. They will ALSO be offered up to 3 coach calls. Coaching by a trained lay coach will be structured and guided by a manual. Trained lay coaches will call participants in the week following delivery of the toolkit to guide them through the self-care toolkit over an 8-week period. Coaches will contact participants a maximum of 3 times, with calls expected to average 15-20 minutes. Call content will be guided by a structured coaching manual adapted from those used in the team's previous two RCTs of the self-care materials. The coaches will follow structured agendas, keep records of all contacts.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- + years old
- consented to be recontacted (participant in a previous study)
You may not qualify if:
- moderate to severe cognitive impairment (using BOMC a brief cognitive screen) -unable to read in English or French (self-reported); hearing impairment (as judged by research staff);
- currently receiving counseling or psychological therapy (as these treatments may conflict with the self-care interventions)
- currently living in a long term care or other medicalized facility,
- presenting suicidal intent (as identified through the final item of the PHQ-9 which will be asked at screening).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St Mary's Hospital Research Centre
Montreal, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University and Family physician, St. Mary's Hospital Center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2020
First Posted
October 30, 2020
Study Start
October 21, 2020
Primary Completion
March 1, 2021
Study Completion
May 1, 2021
Last Updated
September 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share