Esketamine Sedation and Fentanyl Sedation in Pediatric Dental Patients
The Effects of Esketamine Sedation Compared With Fentanyl Sedation in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Double Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Since the 1970s, ketamine has been used in clinical anesthesia treatment. Compared with ketamine, esketamine has a higher clearance rate, so it has a shorter recovery time after anesthesia. This feature also makes ketamine more suitable for pediatric dental patients.The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the efficacy of esketamine sedation and fentanyl sedation in pediatric dental patients
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2022
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 12, 2022
CompletedMarch 15, 2022
March 1, 2022
2 months
September 10, 2020
March 12, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Hypoxemia
The incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia (Spo2\<92%)
Day 0
Midazolam use
The total use of midazolam
Day 0
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Successful sedation
Day 0
Respiratory depression
Day 0
Agitation and delirium
Day 0
Circulatory fluctuation
Day 0
Propofol requiring
Day 0
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Fentanyl group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe fentanyl group was prepared by 1ug/kg fentanyl in 5ml normal saline, assembled with 5ml injection, labeled as "Anesthesia inducer". Midazolam 0.05mg/kg+ "Anesthesia inducer" was applied to all patients for procedural induction by intravenous injection. According to the MOAA/S score of the patients, midazolam could be added 0.5mg per time at more than 2 minutes until the MOAA/S score reached 3, the maximum infusion dose of midazolam was less than 10mg and less than 0.1mg/kg.
Esketamine group
EXPERIMENTALThe esketamine group was prepared by 0.5mg/kg esketamine in 5ml normal saline, assembled with 5ml injection, labeled as "Anesthesia inducer". Midazolam 0.05mg/kg+ "Anesthesia inducer" was applied to all patients for procedural induction by intravenous injection. According to the MOAA/S score of the patients, midazolam could be added 0.5mg per time at more than 2 minutes until the MOAA/S score reached 3, the maximum infusion dose of midazolam was less than 10mg and less than 0.1mg/kg.
Interventions
The fentanyl group was prepared by 1ug/kg fentanyl in 5ml normal saline, assembled with 5ml injection, labeled as "Anesthesia inducer".
The esketamine group was prepared by 0.5mg/kg esketamine in 5ml normal saline, assembled with 5ml injection, labeled as "Anesthesia inducer".
Midazolam 0.05mg/kg+ "Anesthesia inducer" was applied to all patients for procedural induction by intravenous injection. According to the MOAA/S score of the patients, midazolam could be added 0.5mg per time at more than 2 minutes until the MOAA/S score reached 3, the maximum infusion dose of midazolam was less than 10mg and less than 0.1mg/kg.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 6-14 years old.
- Oral out-patient sedative treatment in our hospital.
- BMI between 18 to 30 kg/m2. ④. ASA: I-II degree. ⑤. Sign the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are allergic to esketamine, opioids, propofol, or have contraindications for these drug use.
- Patients with mental illness or who are unable to cooperate.
- Patients who have abnormal reaction to midazolam. ④. Patients who suffer from Apnea. ⑤. Patients who refuse to sign informed consent. ⑥. Patients who participated in other clinical trials within 4 weeks.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Peking University Hospital of Stomatology
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100081, China
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Xudong Yang, MD
Department of anesthesiology of peking university school of stomatology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief of Department of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2020
First Posted
October 22, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2022
Primary Completion
February 28, 2022
Study Completion
March 12, 2022
Last Updated
March 15, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE