NCT04597320

Brief Summary

Since the 1970s, ketamine has been used in clinical anesthesia treatment. Compared with ketamine, esketamine has a higher clearance rate, so it has a shorter recovery time after anesthesia. This feature also makes ketamine more suitable for pediatric dental patients.The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the efficacy of esketamine sedation and fentanyl sedation in pediatric dental patients

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 10, 2020

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 22, 2020

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2022

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 12, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 15, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

September 10, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 12, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

EsketamineFentanylsedationPediatric dental patients

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Hypoxemia

    The incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia (Spo2\<92%)

    Day 0

  • Midazolam use

    The total use of midazolam

    Day 0

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Successful sedation

    Day 0

  • Respiratory depression

    Day 0

  • Agitation and delirium

    Day 0

  • Circulatory fluctuation

    Day 0

  • Propofol requiring

    Day 0

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Fentanyl group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The fentanyl group was prepared by 1ug/kg fentanyl in 5ml normal saline, assembled with 5ml injection, labeled as "Anesthesia inducer". Midazolam 0.05mg/kg+ "Anesthesia inducer" was applied to all patients for procedural induction by intravenous injection. According to the MOAA/S score of the patients, midazolam could be added 0.5mg per time at more than 2 minutes until the MOAA/S score reached 3, the maximum infusion dose of midazolam was less than 10mg and less than 0.1mg/kg.

Drug: FentanylDrug: Midazolam

Esketamine group

EXPERIMENTAL

The esketamine group was prepared by 0.5mg/kg esketamine in 5ml normal saline, assembled with 5ml injection, labeled as "Anesthesia inducer". Midazolam 0.05mg/kg+ "Anesthesia inducer" was applied to all patients for procedural induction by intravenous injection. According to the MOAA/S score of the patients, midazolam could be added 0.5mg per time at more than 2 minutes until the MOAA/S score reached 3, the maximum infusion dose of midazolam was less than 10mg and less than 0.1mg/kg.

Drug: EsketamineDrug: Midazolam

Interventions

The fentanyl group was prepared by 1ug/kg fentanyl in 5ml normal saline, assembled with 5ml injection, labeled as "Anesthesia inducer".

Fentanyl group

The esketamine group was prepared by 0.5mg/kg esketamine in 5ml normal saline, assembled with 5ml injection, labeled as "Anesthesia inducer".

Esketamine group

Midazolam 0.05mg/kg+ "Anesthesia inducer" was applied to all patients for procedural induction by intravenous injection. According to the MOAA/S score of the patients, midazolam could be added 0.5mg per time at more than 2 minutes until the MOAA/S score reached 3, the maximum infusion dose of midazolam was less than 10mg and less than 0.1mg/kg.

Esketamine groupFentanyl group

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 14 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 6-14 years old.
  • Oral out-patient sedative treatment in our hospital.
  • BMI between 18 to 30 kg/m2. ④. ASA: I-II degree. ⑤. Sign the informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who are allergic to esketamine, opioids, propofol, or have contraindications for these drug use.
  • Patients with mental illness or who are unable to cooperate.
  • Patients who have abnormal reaction to midazolam. ④. Patients who suffer from Apnea. ⑤. Patients who refuse to sign informed consent. ⑥. Patients who participated in other clinical trials within 4 weeks.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Peking University Hospital of Stomatology

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100081, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

FentanylEsketamineMidazolam

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsBenzodiazepinesBenzazepinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring

Study Officials

  • Xudong Yang, MD

    Department of anesthesiology of peking university school of stomatology

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Fentanyl group and Esketamine group
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief of Department of Anesthesiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2020

First Posted

October 22, 2020

Study Start

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion

February 28, 2022

Study Completion

March 12, 2022

Last Updated

March 15, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share
Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE

Locations