Remimazolam Tosilate Sedation and Midazolam Sedation in Dental Patients
The Effects of Remimazolam Tosilate Sedation Compared With Midazolam Sedation in Dental Patients: A Double Blind, Prospective , Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
81
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Remimazolam Tosilate is a new short-acting benzodiazepines used in sedation. It has the advantages of rapid metabolism, quick recovery without injection pain. This study aims to compared with Midazolam, study whether Remimazolam Tosilate can achieve the same sedation effect with lower side effects on sedation maintenance period, During the recovery period of anesthesia, can Remimazolam Tosilatebe more stable and rapid.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Apr 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 26, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedMarch 15, 2022
March 1, 2022
3 months
September 10, 2020
March 12, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success rates of sedation
Success rates for patients who completed outpatient treatment with sufficient depth of sedation, additional sedation medication less than 5 times /15 minutes, and without the need of propofol for further sedation.
Day 0
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Time to reach ideal sedation
Day 0
Differences in blood pressure between the two groups
Day 0
Differences in heart rate between the two groups
Day 0
Differences in basic vital signs between the two groups
Day 0
Deepest sedation of MOAA/S
Day 0
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Remimazolam group
EXPERIMENTALDrug administration: 50ug fentanyl and 50mg flurbiprofen at the beginning of induction and pre-prepared drugs labeled "inducers", which contained 3 mg/2ml remimazolam. Successful sedation is defined as MOAA/S score less than or equal to 4 points during the whole process of the treatment. If MOAA/S score was greater than 4 points, a single dose of Remimazolam (1 mg) is allowed to deepen sedation. if three times of deepen sedation within 15 minutes still can not achieve successful sedation, this progress will define as failure sedation.
Midazolam group
ACTIVE COMPARATORDrug administration: 50ug fentanyl and 50mg flurbiprofen at the beginning of induction and pre-prepared drugs labeled "inducers", which contained 2.5 mg/2ml midazolam. Successful sedation is defined as MOAA/S score less than or equal to 4 points during the whole process of the treatment. If MOAA/S score was greater than 4 points, a single dose of Midazolam (1 mg) is allowed to deepen sedation. if three times of deepen sedation within 15 minutes still can not achieve successful sedation, this progress will define as failure sedation.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-60
- BMI in 18-30Kg / m2
- ASA classification I-II level
- Sign informed consent
- Patients whose outpatient treatment time less than 1 hour
- The methods of local anesthesia including: periosteum infiltration method, periodontal ligament injection method, regional nerve block method
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are allergic to benzodiazepines, opioids, flumazenil or have contraindications
- Long-term use of benzodiazepines
- Long-term use of opioids
- Participate in other clinical trials within 4 weeks
- Women during pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Patients who have a history of drug abuse or long-term alcohol abuse
- Patients who suffer from mental illness or unable to cooperate with the experiment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Peking University Hospital of Stomatology
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100081, China
Zijian Guo
Haidian, Beijing Municipality, 100081, China
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Xudong Yang, MD
Department of anesthesiology of peking university school of stomatology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief of Department of Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2020
First Posted
October 26, 2020
Study Start
April 1, 2021
Primary Completion
June 30, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
March 15, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03