Effectiveness of Multimodal Cognitive Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury Sustained During Older Adulthood

NCT04590911 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: CRIR
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 42
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

In a worldwide context of accelerated demographic aging, traumatic brain injury (TBI) in older adults has become a public health problem. TBI incidence grows following an exponential curve as people get older, increasing the occurrence of TBI in ageing individuals. Rehabilitation programs used in clinical settings have generally been developed for younger adults, and their efficacy with older adults who sustain a TBI has not been evaluated. The investigators have tailored a modular cognitive rehabilitation program for individuals who sustain a TBI in older adulthood, the Cognitive Enrichment Program (CEP), by adapting approaches which have shown to be effective in normal ageing and with other neurological conditions. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the CEP in adults having sustained a TBI during later adulthood. Specific objectives are to evaluate the effectiveness on memory, executive functions, psychological well-being and daily life activities using psychometric tests, self-reported questionnaires, and daily life-like tasks. The investigators hypothesize that memory and executive functions training included in the CEP will result in an improvement in both psychometric and self-reported scores in a trained group of older individuals with TBI, whereas this will not be the case for a comparable TBI group who did not receive the CEP intervention.

Conditions

TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury); Rehabilitation; Aging

Keywords

traumatic brain injury; cognitive rehabilitation; aging; memory; executive functions; psychological well-being; daily life activities

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (18)

• Change from baseline (T0) Face-name association (Côte-des-Neiges Computerized Memory Battery) at 14 weeks (post-intervention - T1)

  Episodic memory measure where participants have to associate 12 previously learned face-name pairs.

  14 weeks (pre-post intervention - T0-T1)

• Change from post-intervention (T1) Face-name association (Côte-des-Neiges Computerized Memory Battery) at 6 months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

  Episodic memory measure where participants have to associate 12 previously learned face-name pairs.

  6-months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

• Change from baseline (T0) Word list recall (Côte-des-Neiges Computerized Memory Battery) at 14 weeks (post-intervention - T1)

  Episodic memory measure where participants have to associate 12 previously learned words. Measures of immediate and delayed recall were obtained.

  14 weeks (pre-post intervention - T0-T1)

• Change from post-intervention (T1) Word list recall (Côte-des-Neiges Computerized Memory Battery) at 6-months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

  Episodic memory measure where participants have to associate 12 previously learned words. Measures of immediate and delayed recall were obtained.

  6-months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

• Change from baseline (T0) Text memory (Côte-des-Neiges Computerized Memory Battery) at 14 weeks (post-intervention - T1)

  Episodic memory measure where participants have to recall a short text, which is divided into 23 macrostructure elements (main ideas of the text giving a meaning to the story), and 24 microstructure elements (specific details about the story). Measures of immediate and delayed recall were obtained for macrostructure and microstructure elements.

  14 weeks (pre-post intervention - T0-T1)

• Change from post-intervention (T1) Text memory (Côte-des-Neiges Computerized Memory Battery) at 6-months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

  Episodic memory measure where participants have to recall a short text, which is divided into 23 macrostructure elements (main ideas of the text giving a meaning to the story), and 24 microstructure elements (specific details about the story). Measures of immediate and delayed recall were obtained for macrostructure and microstructure elements.

  6-months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

• Change from baseline (T0) Self-Evaluation Memory Questionnaire (SEMQ) at 14 weeks (post-intervention - T1)

  Self-report memory measure where participants rate (1 to 6; never to always) their memory performance for 10 dimensions for which are derived mean scores: Conversations, Books \& movies, Slips of attention, People, Use of objects, Political \& social events, Places, Actions to perform, Personal events, General. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

  14 weeks (pre-post intervention - T0-T1)

• Change from post-intervention (T1) Self-Evaluation Memory Questionnaire (SEMQ) at 6-months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

  Self-report memory measure where participants rate (1 to 6; never to always) their memory performance for 10 dimensions for which are derived mean scores: Conversations, Books \& movies, Slips of attention, People, Use of objects, Political \& social events, Places, Actions to perform, Personal events, General. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

  6-months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

• Change from baseline (T0) Six Elements Task-Adapted (SET-A) at 14 weeks (post-intervention - T1)

  Executive function measure where participants complete a task where the goal is to earn as many points as possible while following specific rules. Five dimensions are rated according to the degree of attainment (0-3) : Tackling the 6 subtasks, Inter-task balance, Avoiding rule-breaking, Checking time at appropriate moments, and Efficient behavior. The Total score (/15) is also computed.

  14 weeks (pre-post intervention - T0-T1)

• Change from post-intervention (T1) Six Elements Task-Adapted (SET-A) at 6-months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

  Executive function measure where participants complete a task where the goal is to earn as many points as possible while following specific rules. Five dimensions are rated according to the degree of attainment (0-3) : Tackling the 6 subtasks, Inter-task balance, Avoiding rule-breaking, Checking time at appropriate moments, and Efficient behavior. The Total score (/15) is also computed.

  6-months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

• Change from baseline (T0) Sorting Test - Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) at 14 weeks (post-intervention - T1)

  Executive function measure where participant must sort cards with printed words into groups in as many ways as possible and describe their sorting criteria. Measures used are: Confirmed Correct Sort Total (CCS) raw score, Free Sorting Description (FSD) total raw score, and Time-Per-Sort Ratio (TSR) in seconds.

  14 weeks (pre-post intervention - T0-T1)

• Change from post-intervention (T1) Sorting Test - Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) at 6-months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

  Executive function measure where participant must sort cards with printed words into groups in as many ways as possible and describe their sorting criteria. Measures used are: Confirmed Correct Sort Total (CCS) raw score, Free Sorting Description (FSD) total raw score, and Time-Per-Sort Ratio (TSR) in seconds.

  6-months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

• Change from baseline (T0) Stroop Test - Four-color version at 14 weeks (post-intervention - T1)

  Executive function measure where participant complete four tasks (reading, colors, inhibition and flexibility). The measures used (time, in seconds) are Inhibition of the Stroop effect by verbally indicating the color of the ink instead of reading the words, and Flexibility, where participants indicate the color of the ink and read the words when they appear in a box.

  14 weeks (pre-post intervention - T0-T1)

• Change from post-intervention (T1) Stroop Test - Four-color version at 6-months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

  Executive function measure where participant complete four tasks (reading, colors, inhibition and flexibility). The measures used (time, in seconds) are Inhibition of the Stroop effect by verbally indicating the color of the ink instead of reading the words, and Flexibility, where participants indicate the color of the ink and read the words when they appear in a box.

  6-months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

• Change from baseline (T0) Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX) at 14 weeks (post-intervention - T1)

  Self-report executive function measure where participants rate (0 to 5; never to always) their executive functioning on three scales: Executive cognition, Behavioural-Emotional Self-Regulation, and Metacognition. Self-awareness of executive difficulties was used as a measure of generalization by calculating the difference between participants' and a significant other's scores on the three subscales. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

  14 weeks (pre-post intervention - T0-T1)

• Change from post-intervention (T1) Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX) at 6-months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

  Self-report executive function measure where participants rate (0 to 5; never to always) their executive functioning on three scales: Executive cognition, Behavioural-Emotional Self-Regulation, and Metacognition. Self-awareness of executive difficulties was used as a measure of generalization by calculating the difference between participants' and a significant other's scores on the three subscales. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

  6-months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

• Change from baseline (T0) Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) at 14 weeks (post-intervention - T1)

  Self-report measure where participants rate (0-6; low to high) their self-perceived well-being on 22 items. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

  14 weeks (pre-post intervention - T0-T1)

• Change from post-intervention (T1) Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) at 6-months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

  Self-report measure where participants rate (0-6; low to high) their self-perceived well-being on 22 items. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

  6-months post-intervention (follow-up - T2)

Study Arms (2)

CEP intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Cognitive Enrichment Program (CEP) : tailored for individuals who sustain a TBI in later adulthood. The CEP is a 12-week multimodal intervention structured into three modules designed to simultaneously address cognitive problems resulting from TBI, as well as age-related cognitive issues in the following domains: self-awareness, attention and memory, and executive functions.

Behavioral: Cognitive Enrichment Program (CEP)

Usual care

NO INTERVENTION

Usual care : interventions within a holistic interdisciplinary rehabilitation program focused on resuming daily activities and social roles, if needed, as determined by treating physician; does not include any form of cognitive rehabilitation.

Interventions

Cognitive Enrichment Program (CEP) BEHAVIORAL

Multimodal cognitive rehabilitation program for individuals having sustained a traumatic brain injury during older adulthood

CEP intervention

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 55 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• diagnosed with mild, moderate or severe TBI at least six months before enrolment in study, based on the World Health Organization criteria \[16\]: Mild: length of loss or altered level of consciousness (LOC) 0-30 minutes, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score 13-15/15, negative or positive brain imaging (CT-Scan or MRI), post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) duration \<24 hrs; Moderate: LOC 30 min-24 hrs, GCS score 9-12, positive brain imaging, PTA duration 1-14 days; Severe: LOC \>24 h, GCS score 3-8, positive brain imaging, PTA duration \>2 weeks \[16\];
• post-traumatic amnesia period must be already resolved;
• aged at least 55 years;
• fluent in French (speaking, understanding, reading).

You may not qualify if:

• previously received or receiving another specific or direct cognitive intervention focusing on similar or identical cognitive functions;
• diagnosis or documented clinical impressions of dementia (medical files) or Montreal Cognitive Assessment score lower than 20;
• diagnosis of an active psychiatric condition;
• consumption of alcohol (drinking 5 or more drinks on the same occasion on each of 5 or more days weekly in the past 30 days), or consuming illicit drugs.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal: lead
• Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

Iurdpm-Ccsmtl

Montreal, Quebec, H3S1M9, Canada

Location

Related Publications (2)

• Cisneros E, de Guise E, Belleville S, McKerral M. A controlled clinical efficacy trial of multimodal cognitive rehabilitation on episodic memory functioning in older adults with traumatic brain injury. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Sep;64(5):101563. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101563. Epub 2021 Aug 5.

  PMID: 34325040 DERIVED

• Cisneros E, Beausejour V, de Guise E, Belleville S, McKerral M. The impact of multimodal cognitive rehabilitation on executive functions in older adults with traumatic brain injury. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021 Sep;64(5):101559. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101559. Epub 2021 Aug 5.

  PMID: 34303000 DERIVED

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Psychological Well-Being

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Injuries; Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Craniocerebral Trauma; Trauma, Nervous System; Wounds and Injuries; Personal Satisfaction; Behavior

Study Officials

• Michelle McKerral, PhD

  CRIR-IURDPM-CCSMTL and Université de Montréal

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Professor and Researcher

Model Details: Semi-randomized, controlled, before-after study with follow-up at six-months with blinded outcome measurement

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: October 5, 2020
• First Posted: October 19, 2020
• Study Start: September 1, 2012
• Primary Completion: April 1, 2017
• Study Completion: April 1, 2018
• Last Updated: August 28, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

CA (1)