Efficacy of AAC for Functional Communication
Efficacy of Using Augmentative Alternative Communication for Functional Communication in Group Activities
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is a considerable number children who are unable to speak, and our currently not being provided with any AAC options in their therapeutic facilities. The study aims to identify the current practice being employed with these children and then provide an AAC intervention for choice making with in group activities in the existing system, where the child is enrolled. Currently there is no indigenous evidence of AAC being employed effectively with these children. A pre- assessment will be carried out to establish the level of communication of the children. Intervention will be provided in a group for 6 weeks, three days a week, as these children already attend these groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 6, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 12, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2020
CompletedApril 2, 2021
March 1, 2021
12 months
October 6, 2020
March 30, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Self designed Questionnaire
Self designed questionnaire to address choice making in objects, pictures and symbols in three activities Rhymes, Items in Rhymes and Objects
6 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Rhymes, Individual Items in Rhymes, Objects
OTHERExisting method Post intervention
Interventions
Participants will be provided with a choice of 3 Nursery rhymes (Wheels on the bus, Old McDonald and Twinkle Twinkle Little Star) Objects pertaining to the 3 rhymes will be placed on a board Children will be given prompts as per their need and will be marked on the type of prompt given. These children will transit to pictures and Makaton symbols, if they are able to make choices using objects.
Participants will be provided with a choice of 3 pictures within the initial choice making of the 2 Nursery rhymes (Wheels on the bus and Old McDonald ) Wheels on the Bus will include - mama/wipers/horn McDonalds - cow/dog/cat Objects pertaining to the 3 rhymes will be placed on a board Children will be given prompts as per their need and will be marked on the type of prompt given. These children will transit to pictures and Makaton symbols, if they are able to make choices using objects.
Participants will be provided with 2,3 and 4 sensory objects. Participants will opt for an object by making a choice between these objects, if this is achieved then the child will be moved to picture level and symbol.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children with special needs
- Children not currently using any AAC
You may not qualify if:
- Children with any co-morbid conditions.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Riphah Child Development Centre & Step to Learn School
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 46000, Pakistan
Related Publications (8)
Elsahar Y, Hu S, Bouazza-Marouf K, Kerr D, Mansor A. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) Advances: A Review of Configurations for Individuals with a Speech Disability. Sensors (Basel). 2019 Apr 22;19(8):1911. doi: 10.3390/s19081911.
PMID: 31013673BACKGROUNDMeinzen-Derr J, Sheldon RM, Henry S, Grether SM, Smith LE, Mays L, Riddle I, Altaye M, Wiley S. Enhancing language in children who are deaf/hard-of-hearing using augmentative and alternative communication technology strategies. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Oct;125:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.06.015. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
PMID: 31238158BACKGROUNDNam S, Kim J, Sparks S. An Overview of Review Studies on Effectiveness of Major AAC Systems for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities Including Autism. Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship. 2018 Jun;7(2):n2.
BACKGROUNDSchlosser RW, Wendt O. Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: a systematic review. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 Aug;17(3):212-30. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/021).
PMID: 18663107BACKGROUNDLorah ER, Tincani M, Parnell A. Current trends in the use of handheld technology as a speech-generating device for children with autism. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice. 2018 Aug;18(3):317.
BACKGROUNDWaddington H, Sigafoos J, Lancioni GE, O'Reilly MF, van der Meer L, Carnett A, Stevens M, Roche L, Hodis F, Green VA, Sutherland D, Lang R, Marschik PB. Three children with autism spectrum disorder learn to perform a three-step communication sequence using an iPad(R)-based speech-generating device. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2014 Dec;39:59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 May 10.
PMID: 24819024BACKGROUNDRoche L, Sigafoos J, Lancioni GE, O'Reilly MF, Schlosser RW, Stevens M, van der Meer L, Achmadi D, Kagohara D, James R, Carnett A, Hodis F, Green VA, Sutherland D, Lang R, Rispoli M, Machalicek W, Marschik PB. An evaluation of speech production in two boys with neurodevelopmental disorders who received communication intervention with a speech-generating device. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2014 Nov;38:10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
PMID: 25058915BACKGROUNDStasolla F, De Pace C, Damiani R, Di Leone A, Albano V, Perilli V. Comparing PECS and VOCA to promote communication opportunities and to reduce stereotyped behaviors by three girls with Rett syndrome. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2014 Oct 1;8(10):1269-78.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ayesha K Butt, PhD
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 6, 2020
First Posted
October 12, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 15, 2020
Study Completion
December 15, 2020
Last Updated
April 2, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share