NCT05315102

Brief Summary

To determine the effects of chiropractic care on spasticity, functional outcomes and quality of life in spastic cerebral Palsy children.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
39

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 30, 2022

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 7, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 7, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

September 19, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

March 30, 2022

Last Update Submit

September 12, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Gross Motor Function Measure

    The gross motor function measure is a standard instrument that measures the change in motor function with time in Cerebral palsy subjects. It assesses the number of motor tasks a child can perform. A scoring key of 0 - does not initiate, 1 - initiates, 2 - partially completes, and 3 - completed, is used. the higher score, the greater is Gross motor function.

    3 weeks

  • Trunk Control Measurement Scale (TCMS)

    TCMS is an extended version of the trunk impairment scale with a total score of 58, which assesses the quality of static and dynamic trunk control. The maximum value for the total TCMS is 58 points (20 for the category 'static sitting balance', 28 for 'selective movement control', and 10 for 'dynamic reaching'). A higher TCMS score indicates better performance in trunk control.

    3 weeks

  • Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function (MUUL)

    Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function (MUUL) is considered as one of the reliable tools to measure upper limb function. It consists of 16-items to measure the quality of unilateral upper limb function. Scoring is completed across the 30 score items using a three, four or five-point scale and individually defined scoring criteria. Item scores relating to each element of movement measured are summed within the corresponding sub-scale.

    3 weeks

  • Canadian Occupation Performance Measure (COPM)

    It is a client-centred outcome measure that helps the client to identify occupational performance issues and rates performance and satisfaction pre and post-intervention. Total scores are calculated by adding together the performance or satisfaction scores for all problems and dividing them by the number of problems. At reassessment, the client scores each problem again for performance and satisfaction.

    3 weeks

  • Cerebral Palsy Quality Of Life scale (CP-QOL)

    The CP-QOL-child is a condition-specific QOL questionnaire designed for children with CP. QOL is broadly defined as a subjective multidimensional concept for assessing a person's wellbeing across numerous life indicators. The greater the score, the better is the quality of life.

    3 weeks

  • Smartphone app for gait and Balance Assessment

    This embedded inertial sensor-based smartphone application can provide a valid and reliable estimation of several gaits and balance parameters. The smartphone app for gait and balance assessment will be used on the subject who can walk independently.

    3 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Experimental group

EXPERIMENTAL

A registered chiropractor will assess the entire spine, and both sacroiliac joints will be assessed for vertebral subluxation by a registered chiropractor. The clinical indicators that will be used to assess the function of the spine before spinal adjustment intervention include assessing for joint tenderness to palpation manually palpating for a restricted intersegmental range of motion, assessing for palpable asymmetric intervertebral muscle tension, and any abnormal or blocked joint play and end-feel of the joints.

Other: Chiropractic CareOther: Physical therapy intervention

Control group

SHAM COMPARATOR

The participants head and/or spine will be moved in ways that include passive and active movements, similar to what is done when assessing the spine by a chiropractor.No spinal adjustment will be performed during any control intervention.

Other: Sham interventionOther: Physical therapy intervention

Interventions

The participants head and/or spine will be moved in ways that include passive and active movements, similar to what is done when assessing the spine by a chiropractor. The sham intervention will also include the participants moving into adjustment setup positions similar to how the chiropractor would typically set up a patient with no joint pre-loading or adjustive thrust

Control group

A registered chiropractor will assess the entire spine, and both sacroiliac joints will be assessed for vertebral subluxation by a registered chiropractor. The clinical indicators that will be used to assess the function of the spine before spinal adjustment intervention include assessing for joint tenderness to palpation manually palpating for a restricted intersegmental range of motion, assessing for palpable asymmetric intervertebral muscle tension, and any abnormal or blocked joint play and end-feel of the joints.

Experimental group

The standardized treatment protocol will be provided according to the guidelines, which will include various modalities and treatment approaches, including stretching exercises; massage; strengthening exercises of weak muscles, weight-bearing, balance (static and dynamic) and gait training; electrical stimulation; treadmill use; and endurance training for the improvement of gait, motor function, strength and functional mobility in Cerebral Palsy children, where Conventional Therapy will be provided according to the respective needs of the individual patient.

Control groupExperimental group

Eligibility Criteria

Age2 Years - 15 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants will be recruited into the study according to the following criteria.
  • Both gender (Male and Female).
  • Age between 2 to 15 years.
  • Spastic Cerebral Palsy children.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants will be excluded from the study according to the following criteria.
  • Cerebral Palsy children due to Traumatic Brain Injury.
  • Patients having cognitive impairments.
  • Patients having associated Neurological Pathologies.
  • Patients who are unable to follow treatment plan.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Institute of rehabilitation medicine.

Islamabad, Federal, 44000, Pakistan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Damage, ChronicBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Study Officials

  • IMRAN AMJAD, PhD

    Riphah International University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Research
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2022

First Posted

April 7, 2022

Study Start

April 7, 2022

Primary Completion

October 1, 2022

Study Completion

October 1, 2022

Last Updated

September 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations