Enhancing Frontal Lobes Plasticity in Mild Cognitive Impairment
PAS-MCI
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
More than 5 million people live with Alzheimer's dementia (AD) in North America. No effective treatment exists yet probably because by the time AD has developed it is too late to intervene. Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is a clinical state that typically precedes AD. In MCI, the prefrontal cortex supports compensatory mechanisms that depend on robust synaptic plasticity and that delay progression to AD. Using a neurostimulation approach that enhances prefrontal cortical plasticity in vivo, this project aims to enhance prefrontal cortical plasticity and function in patients with MCI. If successful, this project would discover a treatment modality that enhances compensation in MCI and ultimately, prevents progression to AD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 12, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 12, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
April 22, 2026
April 1, 2026
6 years
August 5, 2020
April 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
PAS-Long-term-potentiation (PAS-LTP)
PAS-LTP is measured as the ratio of TMS-induced cortical evoked activity (CEA) post-PAS to TMS-induced CEA pre-PAS
Baseline
Change in PAS-Long-term-potentiation (PAS-LTP)
PAS-LTP is measured as the ratio of TMS-induced cortical evoked activity (CEA) post-PAS to TMS-induced CEA pre-PAS
Baseline, immediately and 1 and 4 weeks following the 10-session course
N-Back Performance
The primary outcome measure will be based on the 2-back condition of the N-Back. N-back accuracy will be assessed using d', which is a sensitivity index based on the z scores of hit rates (H- correctly responding to target trials as target trials) and false alarm rates (F- incorrectly responding to non-target trials as target trials) using the following formula: d' = z(H) - z(F).
Baseline
Change in N-Back Performance
The primary outcome measure will be based on the 2-back condition of the N-Back. N-back accuracy will be assessed using d', which is a sensitivity index based on the z scores of hit rates (H- correctly responding to target trials as target trials) and false alarm rates (F- incorrectly responding to non-target trials as target trials) using the following formula: d' = z(H) - z(F).
Baseline, immediately and 1 and 4 weeks following the 10-session course
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Executive Function Composite Measure
Baseline
Change in Executive Function Composite Measure
Baseline, immediately and 4 weeks following the 10-session course
Other Outcomes (3)
Eye-tracking Measures
Baseline
Wisdom Measure
Baseline
Change in Wisdom Measure
Baseline, immediately and 1 and 4 weeks following the 10-session course
Study Arms (3)
Active PAS
ACTIVE COMPARATORMCI participants will complete the baseline N-back and PAS-EEG assessments at Visit 4. Additionally, 10 MCI participants will complete the optional pilot eye tracking VPC assessment following N-back and prior to PAS-EEG. Afterwards, MCI participants randomized to the active condition will receive a 10-session course of PAS (Visits 5-14), followed by the three follow-up assessments at 0 days, 7 days, and 28 days post intervention.
PAS-Control (PAS-C)
SHAM COMPARATORMCI participants will complete the baseline N-back and PAS-EEG assessments at Visit 4. Additionally, 10 MCI participants will complete the optional pilot eye tracking VPC assessment following N-back and prior to PAS-EEG. Afterwards, MCI participants randomized to the sham condition will receive a 10-session course of PAS-C (Visits 5-14), followed by the three follow-up assessments at 0 days, 7 days, and 28 days post intervention.
Healthy Control
NO INTERVENTIONHealthy Controls will complete screening and baseline N-Back and PAS-EEG. 10 HC participants will also complete the optional pilot eye tracking VPC assessment following N-Back at the Baseline visit. HC participants will not complete the 10-session course of PAS or follow-up assessments.
Interventions
On each of the 10 days of the intervention, participants will receive PAS (or PAS-C) to the left DLPFC by delivering peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) to the right median nerve and TMS to the left DLPFC, followed immediately by PAS (or PAS-C) to the right DLPFC by delivering PNS to the left median nerve and TMS to the right DLPFC. PAS-C differs from PAS only by including an interstimulus interval of 100 ms between PNS and TMS to the DLPFC, compared to 25 ms in the active PAS condition. Using 100 ms interval, we have previously demonstrated that PAS-C does not induce PAS-LTP in the DLPFC. If a participant cannot attend one or more of the 10 consecutive PAS or PAS-C treatment sessions, we will allow up to four extra treatment days to make up for missed sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 60 years or above.
- Right-handed (to minimize heterogeneity with respect to cognitive reserve and plasticity) and as determined by the Edinburgh Handedness Questionnaire.
- Diagnosis of MCI due to AD using the core clinical criteria by the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association for MCI participants (NIA-AA) and ascertained by a study investigator. The following checklist will be used to ascertain the MCI diagnosis:
- Cognitive concern reflecting a change in cognition reported by patient or informant or clinician (i.e., historical or observed evidence of decline over time).
- Not demented ascertained using the study investigator opinion.
- No vascular, traumatic, or medical causes of cognitive decline ascertained using the study investigator opinion.
- Evidence of longitudinal decline in cognition, when feasible, and ascertained using the study investigator opinion.
- Objective evidence of single or multi domain MCI, where single domain MCI refers to deficits using NP battery on only one of the cognitive domains (Speed of Processing; Working Memory; Executive Functioning; Verbal Memory; Visual Memory; Language)and multi domain MCI refers to deficits in more than one of these domains. To determine impairment in one or more cognitive domain, after the NP battery is administered and double scored, a consensus meeting will be held with the research study staff, the study Principal Investigator and the study Neuropsychologist during which eligibility will be discussed. The meeting attendees will take into consideration the participant's education, parental education, pre-morbid IQ, physician's assessment and NP scores to determine if the participant has impairment in one or more cognitive domain.
- Willingness to provide informed consent.
- Ability to read and communicate in English (with corrected vision and hearing, if needed).
You may not qualify if:
- Current use of an acetylcholine esterase inhibitor or memantine ascertained using a Medication List.
- Major Depressive Disorder with active symptoms in the last 3 months ascertained using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM 5 (SCID-5).
- A lifetime diagnosis of bipolar disorder; intellectual disability; or a psychotic disorder ascertained using the SCID-5.
- Substance use disorder active in the last 3 months ascertained using the SCID-5.
- Any other DSM-5 diagnosis ascertained using the SCID-5 that may be associated with prefrontal cortical dysfunction as ascertained using a study investigator opinion.
- Current anticonvulsant use due to its impact on TMS induced activity and ascertained using a Medication List. An exception will be made if they are taking gabapentin or pregabalin AND if the dose had been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to study entry AND if prescribed for chronic pain.
- Current benzodiazepine use of more than what is equivalent to lorazepam 2 mg/day as ascertained using a Medication List. This is due to their known pro-GABAergic activity and the suppressive effect of GABAergic agents on cortical plasticity.
- Any contraindication to MRI or contraindication to TMS (e.g., cardiac pacemaker, acoustic device, history of seizures) ascertained using the TMS Adult Safety Screen (TASS).
- Healthy Controls
- Age 60 years or above.
- Right-handed (to minimize heterogeneity with respect to cognitive reserve and plasticity) and as determined by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory.
- MoCA score \> 26.
- Ability to read and communicate in English (with corrected vision and hearing, if needed).
- Willingness to provide informed consent.
- Diagnosis of MCI due to AD using the core clinical criteria by the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association for MCI participants and ascertained by a study investigator.
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Toronto, Ontario, M6J 1H4, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Rajji TK, Sun Y, Zomorrodi-Moghaddam R, Farzan F, Blumberger DM, Mulsant BH, Fitzgerald PB, Daskalakis ZJ. PAS-induced potentiation of cortical-evoked activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Nov;38(12):2545-52. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.161. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
PMID: 23820586BACKGROUNDKumar S, Zomorrodi R, Ghazala Z, Goodman MS, Blumberger DM, Cheam A, Fischer C, Daskalakis ZJ, Mulsant BH, Pollock BG, Rajji TK. Extent of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Plasticity and Its Association With Working Memory in Patients With Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Dec 1;74(12):1266-1274. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3292.
PMID: 29071355BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sanjeev Kumar, MD
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- A unique advantage of Paired Associative Stimulation (PAS) over other TMS-based interventions is that its control condition (PAS-C) is almost impossible to distinguish from active PAS. Thus, the RCT phase of the study will be completed under triple-blind conditions. First, participants will be blind to whether they are randomized to PAS or PAS-C. Second, the investigator team (investigators and interventionists delivering the 10-session course) will be blind to group assignment. Third, the outcomes assessors conducting the clinical, cognitive and PAS-EEG assessments at baseline and follow-ups will be blind to group assignment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2020
First Posted
October 12, 2020
Study Start
October 12, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share