TMS Treatment of Social Cognition Skills in Mild Cognitive Impairment
EFFECTS of RTMS TREATMENT on SOCIAL COGNITION DYSFUNCTIONS in MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT: an PROSPECTIVE, DOUBLE-BINDING, RANDOMIZED, SINGLE CENTRE, EXPLORATIVE STUDY
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Social cognitive abilities are impaired in around 17% of subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and might not reflect upon functional status. Compared to healthy controls, MCI showed impairments in theory of mind (ToM) and facial emotion recognition. Moreover, in amnesic MCI patients, reduced ToM ability appears to be correlated with worse performances at several cognitive performances. These findings, in agreement with previous evidence, confirm that impaired social cognition might occur prior to dementia: typically elderly start to show impairment in the complex ToM levels, which is found also in MCI patients and proceeds further in AD patients. Thus, the treatment of these aspects has the potential to influence the trajectory of neurodegeneration. In the last decade, it has been increasingly evident the effectiveness of active stimulation of brain regions with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), to improve cognitive and functional performances in patients with dementia. On the other hand, brain imaging techniques and TMS stimulations have identified two main areas responsible for human social cognition- the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and the right temporo-parietal junction (RTPJ). In this project, we hypothesized that an improvement of social cognition skills may be obtained in MCI patients by using the rTMS on two main areas responsible for human social cognition- the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and the right temporoparietal junction (RTPJ). Moreover, it expects that rTMS treatment may also contribute to improving cognitive abilities and neuropsychiatric aspects partially modulated by the same networks stimulated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 11, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2024
CompletedMarch 20, 2025
October 1, 2023
3 years
July 10, 2020
March 17, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Comparison of Deceptive Box Task score
(5 items). Minimum value=0, maximum value=5. A higher score means a better outcome.
Week 2
Comparison of Look-prediction/say-prediction test score
(5 items). Minimum value=0, maximum value=5. A higher score means a better outcome.
Week 2
Comparison of Empathy Quotient score
(60 items). Minimum value=0, maximum value=80. A higher score means a better outcome.
Week 2
Comparison of Ekman 60 test score
(60 b/w pictures). Minimum value=0, maximum value=60. Higher score means a better outcome.
Week 2
Comparison of Frontal Behavioral Inventory score
(24 items). Minimum value=0, maximum value=69. Higher score means a worse outcome.
Week 2
Comparison of Deceptive Box Task score
(5 items). Minimum value=0, maximum value=5. A higher score means a better outcome.
Week 4
Comparison of Look-prediction/say-prediction test
(5 items). Minimum value=0, maximum value=5. A higher score means a better outcome.
Week 4
Comparison of Empathy Quotient score
(60 items). Minimum value=0, maximum value=80. A higher score means a better outcome.
Week 4
Comparison of Ekman 60 test score
(60 b/w pictures). Minimum value=0, maximum value=60. Higher score means a better outcome.
Week 4
Comparison of Frontal Behavioral Inventory score
(24 items). Minimum value=0, maximum value=69. Higher score means a worse outcome.
Week 4
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Changes from baseline in Deceptive Box Task Test.
Week 12
Changes from baseline in Look/say Test
Week 12
Changes from baseline in Empathy Quotient scale
Week 12
Changes from baseline in Ekman 60 Test
Week 12
Changes from baseline in Frontal Behavioral Inventory
Week 12
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
RR-GR
EXPERIMENTALMCI patients with social cognition deficits will receive 4 weeks of rTMS stimulation
SR-GR
OTHERMCI patients with social cognition deficits will receive 2 weeks of placebo treatment, followed by 2 weeks of real rTMS stimulation
Interventions
A two-site rTMS stimulation delivered by a Magstim unit featuring a double 70 mm cooled coil will be applied. MCI patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two study groups: 1. RR-Gr will receive 4 weeks of rTMS stimulation of the right temporo-parietal junction (RTPJ) and medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC); 2. PL-Gr will receive sham stimulation of the RTPJ and MPFC during the first 2 weeks followed by 2 weeks of real stimulation. Each week of rTMS treatment will consist of five sessions (50 min, one per day). For each area target, a total of 2000 pulses at 20Hz, 3-s train duration, and 28-s inter-train interval at 100% motor threshold (MT) will be delivered per session. A fixed intensity of MT will ensure a more consistent spatial spread of TMS effects in subjects' brains not influenced by differences in individual MT. In the sham condition, a sham coil will be used. Each session lasted for about 60 min including time for set up and 50 min of stimulation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects aged 50 to 85 years old, inclusive, at the time of informed consent;
- Must have at least 5 years of education or work experience to exclude mental deficits other than MCI;
- Must meet Petersen's criteria for mild cognitive impairment, and must have:
- Clinical dementia rating global score of 0.5;
- Mini-Mental State Examination score between 24 and 30;
- Must have a score ≥ 26.5 at Token test to ensure that subjects have the ability to understand the instructions and procedures;
- Must have a score \< 29 at Beck Depression Inventory to exclude major depression that could compromise the patient's ability to engage in the study;
- Apart from a clinical diagnosis of MCI, the subject must be in good health;
- Must be on stable dose of antidepressant (if applicable) for at least 2 months prior to the enrolment.
You may not qualify if:
- Any uncontrolled medical or neurological/neurodegenerative condition (other than MCI);
- Clinical significant unstable psychiatric illness requiring treatment with neuroleptic;
- Transient ischemic attack, stroke, or any unexplained loss of consciousness or severe ongoing stressor within 1 year prior to screening;
- History of seizure within10 years prior to screening;
- Recent history of alcohol or substance abuse or use of cannabinoids;
- Any other medical conditions that are not stable or controlled, or could affect the subject's safety or interfere with the study assessments and treatment;
- Contraindication to having TMS treatment;
- Inability to understand the purpose of the study or to comply with study requirements.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Neurocentro della Svizzera italiana,Ospedale Regionale di Lugano
Lugano, Canton Ticino, 6903, Switzerland
Related Publications (14)
Baumgardner DJ, Christopherson A, Momont S. Chlamydia in pregnant women: southeastern Wisconsin. Wis Med J. 1989 Sep;88(9):12-5.
PMID: 2588649BACKGROUNDWondra JD, Ellsworth PC. An appraisal theory of empathy and other vicarious emotional experiences. Psychol Rev. 2015 Jul;122(3):411-28. doi: 10.1037/a0039252. Epub 2015 May 11.
PMID: 25961468BACKGROUNDApperly IA, Samson D, Chiavarino C, Humphreys GW. Frontal and temporo-parietal lobe contributions to theory of mind: neuropsychological evidence from a false-belief task with reduced language and executive demands. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Dec;16(10):1773-84. doi: 10.1162/0898929042947928.
PMID: 15701227BACKGROUNDWood JN, Knutson KM, Grafman J. Psychological structure and neural correlates of event knowledge. Cereb Cortex. 2005 Aug;15(8):1155-61. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh215. Epub 2004 Nov 24.
PMID: 15563720BACKGROUNDVan Overwalle F. Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Mar;30(3):829-58. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20547.
PMID: 18381770BACKGROUNDAmodio DM, Frith CD. Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Apr;7(4):268-77. doi: 10.1038/nrn1884.
PMID: 16552413BACKGROUNDCabeza R, Ciaramelli E, Moscovitch M. Cognitive contributions of the ventral parietal cortex: an integrative theoretical account. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Jun;16(6):338-52. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.008. Epub 2012 May 19.
PMID: 22609315BACKGROUNDDodich A, Cerami C, Crespi C, Canessa N, Lettieri G, Iannaccone S, Marcone A, Cappa SF, Cacioppo JT. Differential Impairment of Cognitive and Affective Mentalizing Abilities in Neurodegenerative Dementias: Evidence from Behavioral Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, and Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;50(4):1011-22. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150605.
PMID: 26836153BACKGROUNDFreedman M, Binns MA, Black SE, Murphy C, Stuss DT. Theory of mind and recognition of facial emotion in dementia: challenge to current concepts. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2013 Jan-Mar;27(1):56-61. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e31824ea5db.
PMID: 22407224BACKGROUNDPadala PR, Padala KP, Lensing SY, Jackson AN, Hunter CR, Parkes CM, Dennis RA, Bopp MM, Caceda R, Mennemeier MS, Roberson PK, Sullivan DH. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for apathy in mild cognitive impairment: A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, cross-over pilot study. Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:312-318. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.063. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
PMID: 29331848BACKGROUNDFerrari C, Vecchi T, Todorov A, Cattaneo Z. Interfering with activity in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex via TMS affects social impressions updating. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Aug;16(4):626-34. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0419-2.
PMID: 27012713BACKGROUNDCotelli M, Manenti R, Cappa SF, Zanetti O, Miniussi C. Transcranial magnetic stimulation improves naming in Alzheimer disease patients at different stages of cognitive decline. Eur J Neurol. 2008 Dec;15(12):1286-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02202.x.
PMID: 19049544BACKGROUNDCotelli M, Calabria M, Zanetti O. Cognitive rehabilitation in Alzheimer's Disease. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2006 Apr;18(2):141-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03327429.
PMID: 16702783BACKGROUNDRiccitelli GC, Beeching F, Lecchi A, Ongaro G, Pertoldi W, Kaelin-Lang A, Sacco L. Enhancing Social Cognition in Mild Cognitive Impairment with Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2025 Dec;39(12):972-982. doi: 10.1177/15459683251360731. Epub 2025 Aug 21.
PMID: 40838395DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leonardo Sacco, Dr
+41 091 811 6921
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 10, 2020
First Posted
July 29, 2020
Study Start
February 11, 2021
Primary Completion
February 28, 2024
Study Completion
March 31, 2024
Last Updated
March 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share