Effectiveness of a Brief Intervention for Acceptance of Influenza Vaccine in the Primary Care Setting
1 other identifier
interventional
524
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Influenza virus has high morbidity rates during annual epidemics, with certain high-risk groups being particularly susceptible to complications and mortality. Vaccination is the main prevention measure, alongside with hygiene measures. Nevertheless, vaccine coverage remains low. Some studies suggest that short, standardized interventions can improve coverage of several vaccines. Hypothesis: Brief Intervention is an effective tool in improving vaccination coverage in people who have initially rejected it. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of a Brief Intervention in increasing influenza vaccination (IIV) coverage compared with the usual advice in people who refuse it. Method: cluster randomized clinical trial. The study population was individuals with high risk factors who initially refused the influenza vaccine. Professionals participants (doctors and nurses) were assigned randomly to the intervention group (brief intervention) and the control group (usual advice).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 14, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2020
CompletedSeptember 29, 2020
September 1, 2020
4 months
September 14, 2020
September 23, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Influenza vaccination status at the end of the Influenza vaccination campaign 2017.
% of reluctant patients vaccinated against Influenza at the end of the campaign 2017. Measurement tool: Influenza vaccine registered in patient's medical history
up to 3 months
Influenza vaccination status of the participants who received the Brief Intervention or the normal advice.
% of reluctant patients vaccinated against Influenza in the Intervention group or in the Control group. Measurement tool: Influenza vaccine registered in patient's medical history
up to 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Reasons for rejecting Influenza Vaccination
one day
Study Arms (2)
Brief Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALIntervention consisted of a standardized Brief Intervention, which varied depending on the reason the patient had given for refusing the vaccination.
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe control group intervention was the normal advice that professionals used to give their patients
Interventions
Previous to the intervention, patients were asked about the reasons to reject the influenza vaccine. Brief Intervention was performed by the healthcare professional during the consultation. It was given verbally, with written support.
In the CG the influenza vaccine advice was the normal advice that professionals used to give their patients and was not asked for the reasons for the rejection of the vaccine to prevent them from influencing the advice.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals in high-risk groups for influenza (paediatric and adult)
- Not intending to be vaccinated against the influenza virus during the current season.
- Informed consent to participate. In case of paediatric patients, parents signed the consent and made decisions about vaccination.
You may not qualify if:
- Language barrier
- Mental or physical conditions which make it difficult for the patient or their relatives to make decisions.
- Having previously participated in the pilot study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CAP Plaça Catalunya- Manresa 2
Manresa, Barcelona, 08242, Spain
Related Publications (14)
Bish A, Yardley L, Nicoll A, Michie S. Factors associated with uptake of vaccination against pandemic influenza: a systematic review. Vaccine. 2011 Sep 2;29(38):6472-84. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.107. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
PMID: 21756960BACKGROUNDGiese C, Mereckiene J, Danis K, O'Donnell J, O'Flanagan D, Cotter S. Low vaccination coverage for seasonal influenza and pneumococcal disease among adults at-risk and health care workers in Ireland, 2013: The key role of GPs in recommending vaccination. Vaccine. 2016 Jul 12;34(32):3657-62. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.05.028. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
PMID: 27255466BACKGROUNDPicazo J, González Romo F, Salleras Sanmartí J, Bayas Rodríguez J, Álvarez Pasquín M. Encuesta sobre la vacunación de adultos en España. Gripe y neumococo. Vacunas. 2012; 13(3): 100-111. doi.10.1016/S1576-9887(12)70048-1
BACKGROUNDStockwell MS, Kharbanda EO, Martinez RA, Vargas CY, Vawdrey DK, Camargo S. Effect of a text messaging intervention on influenza vaccination in an urban, low-income pediatric and adolescent population: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2012 Apr 25;307(16):1702-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.502.
PMID: 22535855BACKGROUNDEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Catalogue of interventions addressing vaccine hesitancy. Stockholm: ECDC; 2017. doi: 10.2900/654210
BACKGROUNDWhitlock EP, Orleans CT, Pender N, Allan J. Evaluating primary care behavioral counseling interventions: an evidence-based approach. Am J Prev Med. 2002 May;22(4):267-84. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00415-4.
PMID: 11988383BACKGROUNDWong VW, Fong DY, Tarrant M. Brief education to increase uptake of influenza vaccine among pregnant women: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 14;14:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-19.
PMID: 24423245BACKGROUNDWong VWY, Fong DYT, Lok KYW, Wong JYH, Sing C, Choi AY, Yuen CYS, Tarrant M. Brief education to promote maternal influenza vaccine uptake: A randomized controlled trial. Vaccine. 2016 Oct 17;34(44):5243-5250. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.09.019. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
PMID: 27667330BACKGROUNDFerguson PE, Jordens CF, Gilroy NM. Patient and family education in HSCT: improving awareness of respiratory virus infection and influenza vaccination. A descriptive study and brief intervention. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010 Apr;45(4):656-61. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.209. Epub 2009 Aug 17.
PMID: 19684629BACKGROUNDChan SS, Leung DY, Leung AY, Lam C, Hung I, Chu D, Chan CK, Johnston J, Liu SH, Liang R, Lam TH, Yuen KY. A nurse-delivered brief health education intervention to improve pneumococcal vaccination rate among older patients with chronic diseases: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jan;52(1):317-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
PMID: 25012957BACKGROUNDBonafide KE, Vanable PA. Male human papillomavirus vaccine acceptance is enhanced by a brief intervention that emphasizes both male-specific vaccine benefits and altruistic motives. Sex Transm Dis. 2015 Feb;42(2):76-80. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000226.
PMID: 25585065BACKGROUNDMuñoz-Miralles R, Bonvehí Nadeu S, Sant Masoliver C, Martín Gallego A, Llamazares Robles MO, Mendioroz Peña J. Efectividad del consejo breve en la vacunación contra la gripe. Estudio piloto en atención primaria. Vacunas. 2019; 20(1): 18-24. doi.10.1016/j.vacun.2019.01.001
BACKGROUNDNyhan B, Reifler J. Does correcting myths about the flu vaccine work? An experimental evaluation of the effects of corrective information. Vaccine. 2015 Jan 9;33(3):459-64. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.017. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
PMID: 25499651BACKGROUNDThomas RE, Lorenzetti DL. Interventions to increase influenza vaccination rates of those 60 years and older in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 30;5(5):CD005188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005188.pub4.
PMID: 29845606BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Primary Health Care Nurse
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2020
First Posted
September 29, 2020
Study Start
October 1, 2017
Primary Completion
January 31, 2018
Study Completion
March 31, 2018
Last Updated
September 29, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share