Evaluation of Postoperative Pain in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Postoperative pain is a common symptom of a flare up after root canal treatments (RCTs). Insufficient instrumentation, extrusion of irrigation solutions and debris and existence of a periapical lesion are the factors affecting postoperative pain after root canal treatments. Aim of this study is to evaluate the postoperative pain and instrumentation time of single-file reciprocating system and multiple-file Ni-Ti rotary system in children ages between 9-12. Study was conducted on fifty first permanent mandibular molars with the diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis. Patients were randomly separated into two groups and RCTs were completed with either Reciproc Blue or Protaper Next file systems. Instrumentation time for each system was noted and patients were given a pain scale which included visual analog scale for 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment. Postoperative pain scores and instrumentation times were analyzed statistically with chi square test and student t test. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain between Reciproc Blue and Protaper Next systems at all time intervals. Instrumentation time was significantly shorter in the Reciproc Blue group in comparison with the Protaper Next group. In conclusion, shorter treatment time of single-file reciprocating systems may be more patient friendly and comfortable than multiple-file rotary systems in RCTs among children.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Jul 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 12, 2020
CompletedAugust 12, 2020
August 1, 2020
20 days
August 10, 2020
August 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Postoperative Pain Assessment After 6 hours
Postoperative pain scores were scored using Modified Wong Baker pain rating scale (0 = no pain, 1 = slight pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain).
6 hours after treatment
Postoperative Pain Assessment After 24 hours
Postoperative pain scores were scored using Modified Wong Baker pain rating scale (0 = no pain, 1 = slight pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain).
24 hours after treatment
Postoperative Pain Assessment After 48 hours
Postoperative pain scores were scored using Modified Wong Baker pain rating scale (0 = no pain, 1 = slight pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain).
48 hours after treatment
Postoperative Pain Assessment After 72 hours
Postoperative pain scores were scored using Modified Wong Baker pain rating scale (0 = no pain, 1 = slight pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain).
72 hours after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Instrumentation Time
During procedure
Study Arms (2)
Protaper Next
ACTIVE COMPARATORProtaper Next group (n=25): The instrumentation of mesial and distal canals were done according to manufacturer's recommendations using X1 and X2 (25.06) at a rotational speed of 300 rpm. Then X3 and X4 (40.06) instruments were used to enlarge distal canals in order to compare the results with the Reciproc Blue group. The root canals were irrigated with 2 ml of %2,5 sodium hypochlorite after each instrument exchange.
Reciproc Blue
ACTIVE COMPARATORReciproc Blue group (n=25) : The canals were shaped with in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. R25 (25.08) instrument was introduced into the canal with slow pecking movement within a 3 mm range each time. The flutes and remnants were cleaned after 3 pecking moves. Then R40 instrument (40.06) was selected to shape the distal canals as the #20 K file was passively introduced to the working length. The root canals were irrigated with 2 ml of %2,5 sodium hypochlorite after each instrument exchange.
Interventions
Patients were randomly separated into two groups and root canal treatments were completed with Protaper Next file systems. Instrumentation time for each system was noted and patients were given a pain scale which included visual analog scale for 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment.Postoperative pain scores and instrumentation times were analyzed statistically with chi square test and student t test.
Patients were randomly separated into two groups and root canal treatments were completed with Reciproc Blue file systems. Instrumentation time for each system was noted and patients were given a pain scale which included visual analog scale for 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment.Postoperative pain scores and instrumentation times were analyzed statistically with chi square test and student t test.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with first permanent mandibular molar teeth which had been diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with no periapical pathology or abscess were included in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who were on antibiotics or analgesics preoperatively were not included in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ege Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Ege University
Izmir, 35100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H. The prevalence of postoperative pain and flare-up in single- and multiple-visit endodontic treatment: a systematic review. Int Endod J. 2008 Feb;41(2):91-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01316.x. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
PMID: 17956561RESULTCicek E, Kocak MM, Kocak S, Saglam BC, Turker SA. Postoperative pain intensity after using different instrumentation techniques: a randomized clinical study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017 Jan-Feb;25(1):20-26. doi: 10.1590/1678-77572016-0138.
PMID: 28198972RESULTShokraneh A, Ajami M, Farhadi N, Hosseini M, Rohani B. Postoperative endodontic pain of three different instrumentation techniques in asymptomatic necrotic mandibular molars with periapical lesion: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jan;21(1):413-418. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1807-2. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
PMID: 27041109RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 10, 2020
First Posted
August 12, 2020
Study Start
July 10, 2020
Primary Completion
July 30, 2020
Study Completion
July 30, 2020
Last Updated
August 12, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share