NCT04510571

Brief Summary

Postoperative pain is a common symptom of a flare up after root canal treatments (RCTs). Insufficient instrumentation, extrusion of irrigation solutions and debris and existence of a periapical lesion are the factors affecting postoperative pain after root canal treatments. Aim of this study is to evaluate the postoperative pain and instrumentation time of single-file reciprocating system and multiple-file Ni-Ti rotary system in children ages between 9-12. Study was conducted on fifty first permanent mandibular molars with the diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis. Patients were randomly separated into two groups and RCTs were completed with either Reciproc Blue or Protaper Next file systems. Instrumentation time for each system was noted and patients were given a pain scale which included visual analog scale for 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment. Postoperative pain scores and instrumentation times were analyzed statistically with chi square test and student t test. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain between Reciproc Blue and Protaper Next systems at all time intervals. Instrumentation time was significantly shorter in the Reciproc Blue group in comparison with the Protaper Next group. In conclusion, shorter treatment time of single-file reciprocating systems may be more patient friendly and comfortable than multiple-file rotary systems in RCTs among children.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 10, 2020

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 30, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 30, 2020

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 10, 2020

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 12, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

August 12, 2020

Status Verified

August 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

20 days

First QC Date

August 10, 2020

Last Update Submit

August 11, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

postoperative painroot canal treatmentreciprocal motionrotary motion

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Postoperative Pain Assessment After 6 hours

    Postoperative pain scores were scored using Modified Wong Baker pain rating scale (0 = no pain, 1 = slight pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain).

    6 hours after treatment

  • Postoperative Pain Assessment After 24 hours

    Postoperative pain scores were scored using Modified Wong Baker pain rating scale (0 = no pain, 1 = slight pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain).

    24 hours after treatment

  • Postoperative Pain Assessment After 48 hours

    Postoperative pain scores were scored using Modified Wong Baker pain rating scale (0 = no pain, 1 = slight pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain).

    48 hours after treatment

  • Postoperative Pain Assessment After 72 hours

    Postoperative pain scores were scored using Modified Wong Baker pain rating scale (0 = no pain, 1 = slight pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain).

    72 hours after treatment

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Instrumentation Time

    During procedure

Study Arms (2)

Protaper Next

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Protaper Next group (n=25): The instrumentation of mesial and distal canals were done according to manufacturer's recommendations using X1 and X2 (25.06) at a rotational speed of 300 rpm. Then X3 and X4 (40.06) instruments were used to enlarge distal canals in order to compare the results with the Reciproc Blue group. The root canals were irrigated with 2 ml of %2,5 sodium hypochlorite after each instrument exchange.

Other: Evaluating Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Treatment with Protaper Next

Reciproc Blue

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Reciproc Blue group (n=25) : The canals were shaped with in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. R25 (25.08) instrument was introduced into the canal with slow pecking movement within a 3 mm range each time. The flutes and remnants were cleaned after 3 pecking moves. Then R40 instrument (40.06) was selected to shape the distal canals as the #20 K file was passively introduced to the working length. The root canals were irrigated with 2 ml of %2,5 sodium hypochlorite after each instrument exchange.

Other: Evaluating Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Treatment with Reciproc Blue Files

Interventions

Patients were randomly separated into two groups and root canal treatments were completed with Protaper Next file systems. Instrumentation time for each system was noted and patients were given a pain scale which included visual analog scale for 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment.Postoperative pain scores and instrumentation times were analyzed statistically with chi square test and student t test.

Also known as: Root Canal Instrumentation, Root Canal Treatment, Assessing Postoperative Pain, Instrumentation Time
Protaper Next

Patients were randomly separated into two groups and root canal treatments were completed with Reciproc Blue file systems. Instrumentation time for each system was noted and patients were given a pain scale which included visual analog scale for 6, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment.Postoperative pain scores and instrumentation times were analyzed statistically with chi square test and student t test.

Also known as: Root Canal Instrumentation, Root Canal Treatment, Assessing Postoperative Pain, Instrumentation Time
Reciproc Blue

Eligibility Criteria

Age9 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with first permanent mandibular molar teeth which had been diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with no periapical pathology or abscess were included in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who were on antibiotics or analgesics preoperatively were not included in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ege University

Izmir, 35100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H. The prevalence of postoperative pain and flare-up in single- and multiple-visit endodontic treatment: a systematic review. Int Endod J. 2008 Feb;41(2):91-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01316.x. Epub 2007 Oct 23.

  • Cicek E, Kocak MM, Kocak S, Saglam BC, Turker SA. Postoperative pain intensity after using different instrumentation techniques: a randomized clinical study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017 Jan-Feb;25(1):20-26. doi: 10.1590/1678-77572016-0138.

  • Shokraneh A, Ajami M, Farhadi N, Hosseini M, Rohani B. Postoperative endodontic pain of three different instrumentation techniques in asymptomatic necrotic mandibular molars with periapical lesion: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jan;21(1):413-418. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1807-2. Epub 2016 Apr 4.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2020

First Posted

August 12, 2020

Study Start

July 10, 2020

Primary Completion

July 30, 2020

Study Completion

July 30, 2020

Last Updated

August 12, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations