Can the Different Instruments Used ın Root Canal Treatment Have an Effect on Postoperative Pain?
Evaluation of Different NiTi Rotary Files With NiTi Hand Files to Postoperative Pain Effects : A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Root canal treatment is a treatment method in which the pulp is irreversibly infected due to caries or trauma or when the pulp loses its vitality. Biomechanical preparation of primary teeth is an important step for a successful root canal treatment. The success of root canal treatment depends not only on the biological results of the treatment, but also on minimizing the postoperative pain of the patients. Therefore, the elimination of factors associated with postoperative pain has an important role in the prognosis of patients after treatment. In all root canal preparation methods, some debris overflows from the apical. Debris protruding into the apical area causes postoperative pain. Many studies in the literature have shown that NiTi rotary files cause less extrusion of debris compared to hand files, and therefore less postoperative pain. Within the scope of this study, the effect of NiTi K hand file and WaveOne Gold, ProTaper Next, EndoArt NiTi Pedo Gold file, AF Baby rotary file systems on postoperative pain in root canal treatment preparations applied to the mandibular primary molar teeth of pediatric patients aged 5-8 years. It is intended to be evaluated using VAS). In our research; ProTaper Next (PTN), WaveOne Gold (WOG), AF Baby rotary file, EndoArt NiTi Pedo Gold file, NiTi K type hand files were used. 100 patients between the ages of 5 and 8 who had root canal treatment indications for mandibular primary second molars were included in the study. The patients were divided into 5 groups with 20 patients in each group. All systems were used according to the manufacturer's instructions and all treatments were performed by a single operator in a single session. Postoperative pain was recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at the 6th, 12th, 18th, 24th, 48th, 72nd hour and 1st week following treatment. The obtained data were evaluated statistically.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Apr 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 18, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 3, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 3, 2023
CompletedJuly 3, 2023
June 1, 2023
1 month
June 3, 2023
June 23, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Postoperative Pain Assessments
Evaluation of the effect on pain after root canal treatment; Parents were trained to use the pain scale; Postoperative pain occurring at the 6th hour was evaluated. All parents participating in the study were blinded to the treatment protocol used for the children. Evaluation of postoperative pain was performed using the VAS . It was explained that the closest score between "0" no pain and "10" severe pain scores should be recorded by the parents.
6 hours
Postoperative Pain Assessments
Evaluation of the effect on pain after root canal treatment; Parents were trained to use the pain scale; Postoperative pain occurring at the 12th hour was evaluated. All parents participating in the study were blinded to the treatment protocol used for the children. Evaluation of postoperative pain was performed using the VAS. It was explained that the closest score between "0" no pain and "10" severe pain scores should be recorded by the parents.
12 hours
Postoperative Pain Assessments
Evaluation of the effect on pain after root canal treatment; Parents were trained to use the pain scale; Postoperative pain occurring at the 24th hour was evaluated. All parents participating in the study were blinded to the treatment protocol used for the children. Evaluation of postoperative pain was performed using the VAS. It was explained that the closest score between "0" no pain and "10" severe pain scores should be recorded by the parents.
24 hours
Postoperative Pain Assessments
Evaluation of the effect on pain after root canal treatment; Parents were trained to use the pain scale; Postoperative pain occurring at the 48th hour was evaluated. All parents participating in the study were blinded to the treatment protocol used for the children. Evaluation of postoperative pain was performed using the VAS. It was explained that the closest score between "0" no pain and "10" severe pain scores should be recorded by the parents.
48 hours
Postoperative Pain Assessments
Evaluation of the effect on pain after root canal treatment; Parents were trained to use the pain scale; Postoperative pain occurring at the 72nd hour was evaluated. All parents participating in the study were blinded to the treatment protocol used for the children. Evaluation of postoperative pain was performed using the VAS. It was explained that the closest score between "0" no pain and "10" severe pain scores should be recorded by the parents.
72 hours
Postoperative Pain Assessments
Evaluation of the effect on pain after root canal treatment; Parents were trained to use the pain scale; Postoperative pain occurring at the 1st week was evaluated. All parents participating in the study were blinded to the treatment protocol used for the children. Evaluation of postoperative pain was performed using the VAS. It was explained that the closest score between "0" no pain and "10" severe pain scores should be recorded by the parents.
1 weeks
Study Arms (5)
Hand K-files
EXPERIMENTALNiTi K type hand file (Perfect Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. Shenzhen, China), Contrary to stainless steel files, turning is produced with the buckling method. torsional resistance and bending resistance of files compared to stainless steel files found more successful in comparison. 16 mm of the files are finished It has the edge. Our Work is 25mm long; 15K (white), 20K (yellow), 25K (red), 30 K (blue) files were used. NiTi K type #15, #20, #25, and #30 hand files were used with a quarter-turn pulling motion, respectively.
ProTaper Next
EXPERIMENTALThe ProTaper Next (PTN) system is produced by adding M-Wire alloy to the ProTaper Universal (PU) system. With the M-Wire alloy, it is aimed to increase the flexibility and cyclic fatigue resistance of the files. The combination of three important design features in PTN files, including changing taper on a single file, M-wire technology and offset design, is one of the important features that distinguish it from other files. PTN X1 and X2 files have both an ascending and a descending conical design on a single file; PTN X3, X4 and X5 files have a constant taper from D1-D3, then taper design that tapers off over the rest of their active segments.
WaveOne Gold
EXPERIMENTALThey are produced by applying Gold-wire process to the WaveOne (WO) system. The WOG file system exhibits repetitive back-and-forth mutual 'reciprocation' motion during preparation, in contrast to the continuous rotational motion. While rotating 150° counterclockwise during the reciprocating motion, clockwise It turns 30° in the direction of, and after 3 cycles, it completes 1 full cycle. Thus, it contributed positively to the file reaching the apical without applying excessive pressure, increasing the cutting efficiency, and accelerating the coronal movement of the debris. Small (yellow-20/0.07), WO Primary (red-25/0.07), and WOG Medium (green-35/0.06) files were used with the appropriate speed and torque values recommended by the manufacturer (300 rpm and 2.0 Ncm) by applying crown down technique. WOG files were operated in a reciprocating motion (150° counterclockwise, 30° clockwise).
AF Baby Rotary File
EXPERIMENTALAF Baby rotary file is specially designed for milk teeth. Entry file 11 mm other the files are 16 mm long and consist of 4 different rotary instruments; (17/.08), (20/.04), (25/.04) and (30/.04).The cross-sections of the files are triangular and heat treatment is applied to the NiTi wire. produced as a result. Thus, an increase in resistance to cyclic fatigue and an increase in dentin It is aimed to reduce screwing. Root canal thanks to its flexibility It adapts very well to the curvatures in its anatomy. AF Baby rotary files #20, #25, and #30 were used with the crown down technique with the appropriate speed and torque values (350 rpm and 2.0 Ncm) recommended by the manufacturer.
EndoArt NiTi Pedo Golf File
EXPERIMENTALEndoArt NiTi Pedo Gold file is specially designed for primary teeth. 18mm length consists of 4 different rotary tools: (15/06) white, (20/04) yellow, (25/04) red, (30/04) blue. The cross-sections of the files are triangular, and Gold wire technology is used in the production phase. were produced using Thus, a titanium oxide layer on the surface of the instrument Happened. Thus, it is more flexible and more flexible than conventional NiTi alloys. resistant and 2 times better cyclic fatigue resistance than conventional files exists. EndoArt NiTi Pedo Golf File; EndoArt NiTi Pedo Gold #15, #20, and #30 files were used with the crown down technique with the appropriate speed and torque values recommended by the manufacturer (350 rpm and 2.0 Ncm).
Interventions
It is used for cleaning and shaping root canals.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- No analgesic use 12 hours before root canal treatment
- No systemic disease.
- Teeth with a diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis, no other teeth causing pain at the site of the tooth to be treated, no inter-root bone loss exceeding 1/3, and root canal inclinations of no more than 25° according to Schneider method were included in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with post-procedural analgesic use were excluded from the study
- Patients whose parents did not fully understand the instructions and who did not attend the follow-up visit one week after treatment were excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Necmettin Erbakan University
Konya, 42090, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Masking was applied only to the patients and their parents included in the study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 3, 2023
First Posted
July 3, 2023
Study Start
April 1, 2022
Primary Completion
May 1, 2022
Study Completion
January 18, 2023
Last Updated
July 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The research will be published soon.