NCT05042713

Brief Summary

Pain after root canal treatment is an important problem that affects the quality of life of patients. Common factors affecting the formation of pain after root canal treatment include insufficient root canal shaping, irrigation solution extrusion, intracanal medicament extrusion, hyperocclusion, missed canals, presence of pre-procedural pain, presence of periapical pathology, and extrusion of apical debris . It has been reported that the file systems and instrumentation technique used in root canal preparation affect apical extrusion, which is the main cause of postoperative pain . It has been reported that single-file systems introduced to the market to shorten root canal treatment time cause less postoperative pain than multi-file systems. However, there are different opinions about the effect of reciprocal and rotational file systems on postoperative pain. It has been reported that coronal flaring during root canal shaping facilitates apical access of instruments and irrigation solution. NiTi instruments generally tend to orient tissue debris coronally, coronal shaping can create a reservoir for collecting debris accumulated in the coronal portion of the root. Therefore, increasing the coronal space for debris reduces the amount of apically removed extrusion. However, single file systems do not have a coronal flaring file and canal preparation is completed with a single file. An increased amount of apical extrusion may occur due to insufficient coronal shaping during canal preparation using single-file systems. In this study, the effect of the use of coronal flaring file together with rotational and reciprocal single file systems on postoperative pain will be investigated, since there are different results about the effects of rotational and reciprocal file systems on postoperative pain, and although it has been reported that coronal flaring reduces apical extrusion, there is no study that determines the effect on postoperative pain. Thus, it is aimed to reduce the pain after root canal treatment and to have a more comfortable and painless process after the procedure.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2021

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 25, 2021

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2021

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 13, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

September 13, 2021

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

August 25, 2021

Last Update Submit

September 6, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

root canalcoronal flaringsingle file systempostoperative pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual Analog Score Scala

    Postoperative pain will be assessed with a visual analog score after endodontic treatment.

    The change in the postoperative pain levels by the patient at the 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours and at the end of 1 week will be compared.

Study Arms (4)

Wave One Gold

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Wave One Gold file will be used with the VDW endodontic motor (VDW) in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.

Other: WaveOne Gold, One Curve, OneFlare

One Flare and Wave One Gold file system

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The One Flare file will be used with a rotational speed of 300 rpm and 3 N/cm torque at a working length of 3 mm. After the Wave One Gold file will be used with the VDW endodontic motor (VDW) in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.

Other: WaveOne Gold, One Curve, OneFlare

One Curve

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The One Curve file (Size 25) will be used in the VDW endodontic motor (VDW) in continuous rotation at 300 rpm and 2.5 Ncm torque in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.

Other: WaveOne Gold, One Curve, OneFlare

One Curve with One Flare

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The One Flare file will be used with a rotational speed of 300 rpm and 3 N/cm torque at a working length of 3 mm. After the One Curve file (Size 25) will be used in the VDW endodontic motor (VDW) in continuous rotation at 300 rpm and 2.5 Ncm torque in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.

Other: WaveOne Gold, One Curve, OneFlare

Interventions

During the endodontic treatment of molar teeth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis, the effect on postoperative pain when single file systems with rotational (OneCurve) and reciprocal (WaveOne Gold) kinematics are used with and without coronal flaring instrument (OneFlare) will be compared.

One CurveOne Curve with One FlareOne Flare and Wave One Gold file systemWave One Gold

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy persons between the ages of 18 and 45 years
  • Mandibular molar teeth that were diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who are taken analgesic inflammatory drugs with in the last 12 hours
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Teeth with calcified canals
  • Teeth with periodontal diseases
  • Teeth with sensitive to percussion and palpation
  • Teeth with root resorption
  • Teeth with immature/open apex

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Pedulla E, Genovesi F, Rapisarda S, La Rosa GR, Grande NM, Plotino G, Adorno CG. Effects of 6 Single-File Systems on Dentinal Crack Formation. J Endod. 2017 Mar;43(3):456-461. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.10.038. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

    PMID: 28131416BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Central Study Contacts

Hacer Şahin Aydınyurt, Phd

CONTACT

Murat Tunca, Phd

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients will be divided into 4 groups according to the file systems to be used in root canal treatment; Group 1: Wave One Gold Group 2: One Flare + Wave One Gold Group 3: One Curve Group 4: One Flare + One Curve.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Asist. Prof.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2021

First Posted

September 13, 2021

Study Start

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion

December 30, 2021

Study Completion

July 1, 2022

Last Updated

September 13, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share