NCT04481451

Brief Summary

This study proposes to evaluate the efficacy of single shot erector spinae block (ESB) versus single shot quadratus lumborum block (QLB) when used in conjunction with continuous lumbar plexus block (LPB) for postoperative analgesia in children and adolescents undergoing unilateral hip surgical procedures. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of the QL vs. ESP blocks as supplements to the lumbar plexus block with respect to pain control outcomes after hip PAO surgery. Both blocks are safe and easy to perform. There is currently no comparative, prospective data concerning the use of these two blocks for hip surgery. The investigational hypothesis is that there will be no clinical difference in the amount of opioid consumed or the overall pain control offered by these two block options.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2020

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 15, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 22, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2020

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 12, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

July 15, 2020

Last Update Submit

December 5, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

painregional anesthesiaregional blocklumbar plexus blockerector spinae blockparavertebral blockcontinuous nerve blockpostoperative pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rescue analgesic consumption

    Opioid use via PCA

    Day 1

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Mean pain scores

    Every 12 hours

  • PACU Time

    PACU stay

  • Adverse events

    2 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Erector spinae supplemental block

EXPERIMENTAL

Single-shot T9/T10 operative side erector spinae block using ropivacaine 0.2%, 0.5ml/kg.

Procedure: Erector spinae block with ropivacaine 0.2%Drug: Ropivacaine

Quadratus lumborum supplemental block

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Single-shot T9/T10 operative side quadratus lumborum (type 1) block using ropivacaine 0.2%, 0.5ml/kg.

Procedure: Quadratus lumborum block with ropivacaine 0.2%Drug: Ropivacaine

Interventions

Single-shot ultrasound-guided nerve block performed ipsilateral to surgical site.

Also known as: regional nerve block, ropivacaine
Erector spinae supplemental block

Single-shot ultrasound-guided nerve block performed ipsilateral to surgical site.

Also known as: regional nerve block, ropivacaine
Quadratus lumborum supplemental block

ropivacaine 0.2% nerve block injection

Also known as: Naropin
Erector spinae supplemental blockQuadratus lumborum supplemental block

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years - 30 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • ASA I - III status, undergoing unilateral periacetabular osteotomy for treating primary diagnosis of developmental acetabular dysplasia in symptomatic young patients.
  • Ages 15 - 30 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing procedures including revision PAO, bilateral PAO, conversion to total hip arthroplasty.
  • Patients whom for any reason did not received a lumbar plexus catheter as part of the baseline regional anesthesia plan
  • Patients with body mass index (BMI) \> 35
  • Patients with known coagulopathies.
  • Patients with severe neurodevelopmental delays.
  • Patients with previous chronic pain syndromes.
  • Patients with a history of opioid treatment at any point in the 2 months prior to surgery.
  • Lack of parental consent and/or patient assent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Boston Children"S Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02118, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, PostoperativeHip DislocationPain

Interventions

Ropivacaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsJoint DislocationsJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesWounds and InjuriesHip Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Study Officials

  • ROLAND BRUSSEAU, MD

    Boston Children's Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The identity of the study block type will be hidden from caregivers unless clinically mandated.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 2 arm randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director, Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Services

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2020

First Posted

July 22, 2020

Study Start

December 1, 2020

Primary Completion

December 1, 2025

Study Completion

December 1, 2025

Last Updated

December 12, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations