Study Stopped
Decline of eligible participants
Comparison of TAP, Anterior QL, or ESP Block for Elective Cesarean Section
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this prospective single center, randomized study is to determine if ultrasound guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP), Quadratus Lumborum (QL), and Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) blocks decrease opioid consumption in subjects undergoing elective cesarean section.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Sep 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 2, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 12, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 18, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 20, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 12, 2022
CompletedJanuary 12, 2022
January 1, 2022
1.5 years
October 2, 2018
November 22, 2021
January 3, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Postoperative Opioid Consumption
Amount of opioid in milligrams.
2 hours postoperatively
Postoperative Opioid Consumption
Amount of opioid
6 hours postoperatively
Postoperative Opioid Consumption
Amount of opioid
24 hours postoperatively
Postoperative Opioid Consumption
Amount of opioid
48 hours postoperatively
Postoperative Pain Scores
Visual Analog Scale at rest with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable
2 hours postoperatively
Postoperative Pain Scores
Visual Analog Scale at rest with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable
6 hours postoperatively
Postoperative Pain Scores
Visual Analog Scale at rest with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable
24 hours postoperatively
Postoperative Pain Scores
Visual Analog Scale at rest with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable
48 hours postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Number of Participants Requiring Antipruritics
2 hours postoperatively
Number of Participants Requiring Antipruritics
6 hours postoperatively
Number of Participants Requiring Antipruritics
24 hours postoperatively
Number of Participants Requiring Antipruritics
48 hours postoperatively
Number of Participants Requiring Antiemetics
2 hours postoperatively
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
TAP block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive bilateral TAP blocks after delivery and within one hour of skin closure with 25 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine with epinephrine 1:400,000 per side.
QL block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive bilateral QL blocks after delivery and within one hour of skin closure with 25 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine with epinephrine 1:400,000 per side.
ESP block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive bilateral ESP blocks after delivery and within one hour of skin closure with 25 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine with epinephrine 1:400,000 per side.
Interventions
Patients will be randomly assigned to receive one three blocks (TAP, QL, ESP)after delivery of baby with ropivicaine
Patient will receive bilateral TAP blocks after delivery and within one hour of skin closure with 25 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine with epinephrine 1:400,000 per side.
Patients will receive bilateral QL blocks after delivery and within one hour of skin closure with 25 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine with epinephrine 1:400,000 per side.
Patients will receive bilateral ESP blocks after delivery and within one hour of skin closure with 25 mL of 0.2% of ropivacaine with epinephrine 1:400,000 per side.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status 1-3
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years
- Scheduled for elective cesarean section
- English speaking
You may not qualify if:
- ASA Physical Status 4-5
- Diagnosis of chronic pain
- Chronic opioid use (opioid use in the past 3 months)
- Preoperative use of SSRIs (Celexa, Lexapro, Prozac, Paxil), SNRIs (Cymbalta, Effexor), gabapentin, or pregabalin (Lyrica)
- Inability to cooperate with or understand protocol
- Inability to communicate pain scores or need for analgesia
- Infection at the site of block placement
- Intolerance or allergy to local anesthetics
- Neurologic deficit or disorder
- Blood thinning disorder or taking anticoagulant medication
- BMI \> 50 kg/m2
- Suspected or known addiction to or abuse of illicit drug(s), prescription medicine(s), or alcohol within the past 2 years
- Uncontrolled anxiety, schizophrenia, or other psychiatric disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with study assessments or compliance
- Current or historical evidence of any clinically significant disease or condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may increase the risk of surgery or complicate the subject's postoperative course
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Related Publications (16)
Marcus MA, Brodner G. Are opioids contraindicated as postoperative pain relief for patients who are breast-feeding their newborn? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2001 Jun;14(3):287-9. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200106000-00001. No abstract available.
PMID: 17019104BACKGROUNDMarcus H, Gerbershagen HJ, Peelen LM, Aduckathil S, Kappen TH, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W, Stamer UM. Quality of pain treatment after caesarean section: Results of a multicentre cohort study. Eur J Pain. 2015 Aug;19(7):929-39. doi: 10.1002/ejp.619. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
PMID: 25413847BACKGROUNDBateman BT, Cole NM, Maeda A, Burns SM, Houle TT, Huybrechts KF, Clancy CR, Hopp SB, Ecker JL, Ende H, Grewe K, Raposo Corradini B, Schoenfeld RE, Sankar K, Day LJ, Harris L, Booth JL, Flood P, Bauer ME, Tsen LC, Landau R, Leffert LR. Patterns of Opioid Prescription and Use After Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;130(1):29-35. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002093.
PMID: 28594763BACKGROUNDOsmundson SS, Schornack LA, Grasch JL, Zuckerwise LC, Young JL, Richardson MG. Postdischarge Opioid Use After Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;130(1):36-41. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002095.
PMID: 28594766BACKGROUNDBateman BT, Franklin JM, Bykov K, Avorn J, Shrank WH, Brennan TA, Landon JE, Rathmell JP, Huybrechts KF, Fischer MA, Choudhry NK. Persistent opioid use following cesarean delivery: patterns and predictors among opioid-naive women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):353.e1-353.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.016. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
PMID: 26996986BACKGROUNDEslamian L, Jalili Z, Jamal A, Marsoosi V, Movafegh A. Transversus abdominis plane block reduces postoperative pain intensity and analgesic consumption in elective cesarean delivery under general anesthesia. J Anesth. 2012 Jun;26(3):334-8. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1336-3. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
PMID: 22354671BACKGROUNDFusco P, Scimia P, Paladini G, Fiorenzi M, Petrucci E, Pozone T, Vacca F, Behr A, Micaglio M, Danelli G, Cofini V, Necozione S, Carta G, Petrini F, Marinangeli F. Transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Cesarean delivery. A systematic review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 Feb;81(2):195-204. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
PMID: 24739207BACKGROUNDFactor D, Chin KJ. Transversus abdominis plane block in lower segment cesarean section: a question of block failure or lack of efficacy? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Jul-Aug;35(4):404-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181e66f01. No abstract available.
PMID: 20588155BACKGROUNDLoane H, Preston R, Douglas MJ, Massey S, Papsdorf M, Tyler J. A randomized controlled trial comparing intrathecal morphine with transversus abdominis plane block for post-cesarean delivery analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012 Apr;21(2):112-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
PMID: 22410586BACKGROUNDBlanco R, Ansari T, Riad W, Shetty N. Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):757-762. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000495.
PMID: 27755488BACKGROUNDKadam VR. Ultrasound guided quadratus lumborum block or posterior transversus abdominis plane block catheter infusion as a postoperative analgesic technique for abdominal surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Jan-Mar;31(1):130-1. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.150575. No abstract available.
PMID: 25788791BACKGROUNDKadam VR, Howell S. Ultrasound-guided continuous transmuscular quadratus lumborum block- L4 or L2 level catheter insertion for analgesia in open abdominal surgery: Case series. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Jul;62(7):555-557. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_242_18. No abstract available.
PMID: 30078860BACKGROUNDChin KJ, Malhas L, Perlas A. The Erector Spinae Plane Block Provides Visceral Abdominal Analgesia in Bariatric Surgery: A Report of 3 Cases. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):372-376. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000581.
PMID: 28272292BACKGROUNDLuis-Navarro JC, Seda-Guzman M, Luis-Moreno C, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane block in abdominal surgery: Case series. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Jul;62(7):549-554. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_57_18.
PMID: 30078859BACKGROUNDTulgar S, Selvi O, Kapakli MS. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Different Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgeries: Case Series. Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2018 Feb 18;2018:3947281. doi: 10.1155/2018/3947281. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29670771BACKGROUNDYamak Altinpulluk E, Garcia Simon D, Fajardo-Perez M. Erector spinae plane block for analgesia after lower segment caesarean section: Case report. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2018 May;65(5):284-286. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2017.11.006. Epub 2018 Jan 17. English, Spanish.
PMID: 29352577BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Amanda Kumar, MD
- Organization
- Duke University Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amanda Kumar, MD
Duke
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 2, 2018
First Posted
October 3, 2018
Study Start
September 12, 2019
Primary Completion
March 18, 2021
Study Completion
March 20, 2021
Last Updated
January 12, 2022
Results First Posted
January 12, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share