The Role of Quadratus Lumborum Blocks Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
76
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare quality of recovery as well as peri-operative systemic opiates use and pain scores in patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy when local anesthetic versus Quadratus Lumborum nerve block (QL-2) is added to the standard pain management.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Sep 2022
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 7, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 24, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 7, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 5, 2024
CompletedJune 5, 2024
May 1, 2024
6 months
June 28, 2022
February 24, 2024
May 9, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Pain as Assessed by the Quality of Recovery (QOR-40) Validated Questionnaire
The QOR-40 questionnaire has 7 questions assessing pain with a maximum score of 35 and a minimum score of 5, a lower score indicating greater pain.
24 hours after anesthesia
Physical Comfort as Assessed by the Quality of Recovery (QOR-40) Validated Questionnaire
The QOR-40 questionnaire has 12 questions assessing physical comfort with a maximum score of 60 and a minimum score of 12, a lower score indicating a worst outcome.
24 hours after anesthesia
Physical Independence as Assessed by the Quality of Recovery (QOR-40) Validated Questionnaire
The QOR-40 questionnaire has 5 questions assessing physical independence, with a maximum score of 25 and a minimum score of 5, with a lower score indicating a worst outcome.
24 hours after anesthesia
Psychological Support as Assessed by the Quality of Recovery (QOR-40) Validated Questionnaire
The QOR-40 questionnaire has 7 questions assessing Psychological support, with a maximum score of 35 and a minimum score of 7, with a lower score indicating a worst outcome.
24 hours after anesthesia
Emotional State as Assessed by the Quality of Recovery (QOR-40) Validated Questionnaire
The QOR-40 questionnaire has 9 questions assessing emotional state, with a maximum score of 45 and a minimum score of 9, with a lower number indicating a worst outcome.
24 hours after anesthesia
Quality of Recovery as Assessed by the Quality of Recovery (QOR-40) Validated Questionnaire
The QOR-40 questionnaire has 40 questions with a total score from 40 (poorest quality of recovery) to 200 (best quality of recovery), with a higher score indicating a better outcome
24 hours after anesthesia
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Pain at Rest as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale
Post anesthesia care unit (PACU) immediately postoperatively
Pain at Rest as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale
At the time of first opiate administration(upto one day after surgery)
Pain at Rest as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale
At the time of discharge (upto 3 days after surgery)
Pain at Rest as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale
Day 1 (24+/=4 hours post surgery)
Pain at Dynamic as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale
Day 1 (24+/=4 hours post surgery)
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (6)
Number of Participants That Required Morcellation
Intraoperative (about 3 hours)
Specimen Weight
inoperative (about 3 hours)
Duration of Surgery
about 3 hours
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
QL Block
EXPERIMENTALLocal Anesthesia at incision site
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
20 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine will be given at incision site
20 mls of normal saline given at QL.The QL block will be administered on both the right and left sides. The transducer is placed transverse immediately cranial to the iliac crest and at the level of the posterior axillary line. The needle is then inserted inplane from the lateral edge of the transducer and advanced through the quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle until the needle tip penetrated the epimysium of the anterior part of the QL muscle. The anesthetic is injected after repeated negative aspiration tests for blood in the fascial interspace between the QL and psoas major (PM) muscles posterior to the transversalis fascia
QL block involves injection of 19 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine and iml(4mg) of Decadron in a fascial place formed partly by the posterior surface of the quadratus lumborum muscle.The QL block will be administered on both the right and left sides. The transducer is placed transverse immediately cranial to the iliac crest and at the level of the posterior axillary line. The needle is then inserted inplane from the lateral edge of the transducer and advanced through the quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle until the needle tip penetrated the epimysium of the anterior part of the QL muscle. The anesthetic is injected after repeated negative aspiration tests for blood in the fascial interspace between the QL and psoas major (PM) muscles posterior to the transversalis fascia
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English or Spanish speaking
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1-3
- Planned laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy
You may not qualify if:
- History of chronic pain requiring preoperative opioids, Known alcoholism disorder
- Congenital coagulopathy,
- Localized soft tissue infection,
- Use of anticoagulants,
- Dementia, inability or refusal to provide consent for the surgery
- Morbid obesity (BMI \> 50), due to expected technical difficulty to achieve the block
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Randa J Jalloul, MD
- Organization
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Randa J Jalloul, MD
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2022
First Posted
July 29, 2022
Study Start
September 7, 2022
Primary Completion
February 24, 2023
Study Completion
April 7, 2023
Last Updated
June 5, 2024
Results First Posted
June 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05