More Appreciation and Less Criticism Project
A Pilot Intervention Study to Increase Appreciation and Reduce Criticism Among Families in Hong Kong
1 other identifier
interventional
803
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The project "More Appreciation and Less Criticism Project" (MALC) is a collaboration between the Tung Wah Group of Hospitals (TWGHs) and the School of Public Health of The University of Hong Kong (HKUSPH), funded by The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust. The objectives are to develop and test theory-driven group programmes to increase parents' intention and actual behaviours to express more appreciation or less criticism when interacting with their children, thereby enhancing family harmony and happiness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2012
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 24, 2020
CompletedJune 24, 2020
June 1, 2020
1.2 years
June 16, 2020
June 21, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Changes from baseline self-reported appreciation behaviours at follow-ups
Being assessed by averaging two items, measuring the frequency with which parents expressed appreciation (express appreciation towards children's efforts; express appreciation towards children's strengths) in the past 7 days. Responses range from 0 to 6 (0: '0 time,' 1: 'one to two times per week,' 2: 'three to four times per week,' 3: 'five to six times per week,' 4: 'once a day,' 5: 'two to three times a day,' and 6: 'four times or more per day'). The Cronbach's alpha is 0.90.
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), 2-week post-workshop (T3) and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Changes from baseline self-reported criticism behaviours at follow-ups
Being assessed by averaging two items, measuring the frequency with which parents expressed criticism (criticise children; express dissatisfaction towards children's behavior) in the past 7 days. Responses range from 0 to 6 (0: '0 time,' 1: 'one to two times per week,' 2: 'three to four times per week,' 3: 'five to six times per week,' 4: 'once a day,' 5: 'two to three times a day,' and 6: 'four times or more per day'). The Cronbach's alpha is 0.93.
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), 2-week post-workshop (T3) and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Changes from baseline self-reported fruit and vegetable intake behaviours at follow-ups
Being assessed by summing two items, one each for the number of servings of fruits and vegetables consumed in the past week.
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), 2-week post-workshop (T3) and 6-week post-workshop (T4).
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Changes from baseline outcome expectancies of more appreciation at post-workshop
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), and T2 (immediately after the workshop).
Changes from baseline outcome expectancies of less criticism at post-workshop
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), and T2 (immediately after the workshop).
Changes from baseline outcome expectancies of fruit and vegetable intake at post-workshop
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), and T2 (immediately after the workshop).
Changes from baseline intention to express more appreciation at post-workshop and 2-week
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), and 2-week post-workshop (T3).
Changes from baseline intention to criticize less at post-workshop and 2-week
Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), and 2-week post-workshop (T3).
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
More Appreciation
EXPERIMENTALA 6-minute engaging video will be shown, illustrating examples where a mother initially withholds her appreciation for her son's effort in school and later express it. The video will also capture the effect on the child and the family. Attributional discussion questions will follow to elicit positive outcomes of expressing appreciation and the negative outcomes of withholding appreciation (e.g., What may be the long-term effects of showing appreciation on your child, family, or on yourself?). Key points will be summarised and reinforced to enhance behavioural intention (Schwarzer \& Luszczynska, 2008). Then the participants will be asked to plan by indicating when (e.g., Saturday afternoon), what (e.g., child helping a younger sibling prepare for a dictation test), and how (e.g., "I can see that you gave up your leisure time to help your sister with the spelling. Thank you!") they would express appreciation to their children.
Less Criticism
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will watch a 6-minute video showing examples of a father criticising his son, which will be replaced by positive communication later, and the different reactions evoked in the child and the family. Then, participants will have an attributional discussion on the negative effects of criticism (e.g., negative effect on self-worth and motivation) and positive outcomes of using constructive feedback (e.g., promptly identifying undesirable behaviours without relating to personal traits or abilities). In small groups, they will work out alternatives (i.e., constructive feedback; termed "positive reminder" in the intervention) to criticism, and each plan and write down when (e.g., after school), what (e.g., low test marks), and how (e.g., "How do you prepare for the tests?)
Fruit and Vegetable
EXPERIMENTALThis workshop will emphasise the importance of consuming at least 5 portions of fruit and vegetable daily for a healthy diet, and aim to boost participants' self-efficacy in achieving this. Participants will be presented with examples of one portion of fruit or vegetable, and then create their own recipes. They will also consider how to overcome obstacles of consuming more portions. Each participant will set goals and write down plans on when, where, what, and how they would increase their fruit and vegetable intake of their children and family as a whole.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parents who are Cantonese-speaking, able to complete study questionnaire, and who have children attending p.4 to p.6 will be included.
You may not qualify if:
- Parents with active psychiatric problems, suicidal ideations, personality disorders, emotional problems, and mental retardartion will be excluded from the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The University of Hong Konglead
- Tung Wah Group of Hospitalscollaborator
Related Publications (1)
Fung SSW, Lam TH, Sun Y, Man PKW, Ip JCM, Wan ANT, Stewart S, Ho SY. A cluster randomized controlled trial of more appreciation and less criticism in Hong Kong parents. J Fam Psychol. 2020 Sep;34(6):731-739. doi: 10.1037/fam0000628. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
PMID: 31944801RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Samantha Fung, PhD
The University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- The person recruiting participants and the participants enrolled are not blinded to the allocation status. Double blinding in cluster RCTs for psychosocial or behavioural interventions is often difficult to implement.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2020
First Posted
June 24, 2020
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 31, 2013
Study Completion
May 31, 2013
Last Updated
June 24, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Generally, individual participant data will not be shared with a third party. People not involved in the project can check the data availability from the principal investigator.