NCT04445818

Brief Summary

The project "More Appreciation and Less Criticism Project" (MALC) is a collaboration between the Tung Wah Group of Hospitals (TWGHs) and the School of Public Health of The University of Hong Kong (HKUSPH), funded by The Hong Kong Jockey Club Charities Trust. The objectives are to develop and test theory-driven group programmes to increase parents' intention and actual behaviours to express more appreciation or less criticism when interacting with their children, thereby enhancing family harmony and happiness.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
803

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2012

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2012

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2013

Completed
7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 16, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 24, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

June 24, 2020

Status Verified

June 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

June 16, 2020

Last Update Submit

June 21, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

ParentingAppreciationCriticismFruit and Vegetable ConsumptionFamily

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Changes from baseline self-reported appreciation behaviours at follow-ups

    Being assessed by averaging two items, measuring the frequency with which parents expressed appreciation (express appreciation towards children's efforts; express appreciation towards children's strengths) in the past 7 days. Responses range from 0 to 6 (0: '0 time,' 1: 'one to two times per week,' 2: 'three to four times per week,' 3: 'five to six times per week,' 4: 'once a day,' 5: 'two to three times a day,' and 6: 'four times or more per day'). The Cronbach's alpha is 0.90.

    Baseline (before the workshop, T1), 2-week post-workshop (T3) and 6-week post-workshop (T4).

  • Changes from baseline self-reported criticism behaviours at follow-ups

    Being assessed by averaging two items, measuring the frequency with which parents expressed criticism (criticise children; express dissatisfaction towards children's behavior) in the past 7 days. Responses range from 0 to 6 (0: '0 time,' 1: 'one to two times per week,' 2: 'three to four times per week,' 3: 'five to six times per week,' 4: 'once a day,' 5: 'two to three times a day,' and 6: 'four times or more per day'). The Cronbach's alpha is 0.93.

    Baseline (before the workshop, T1), 2-week post-workshop (T3) and 6-week post-workshop (T4).

  • Changes from baseline self-reported fruit and vegetable intake behaviours at follow-ups

    Being assessed by summing two items, one each for the number of servings of fruits and vegetables consumed in the past week.

    Baseline (before the workshop, T1), 2-week post-workshop (T3) and 6-week post-workshop (T4).

Secondary Outcomes (16)

  • Changes from baseline outcome expectancies of more appreciation at post-workshop

    Baseline (before the workshop, T1), and T2 (immediately after the workshop).

  • Changes from baseline outcome expectancies of less criticism at post-workshop

    Baseline (before the workshop, T1), and T2 (immediately after the workshop).

  • Changes from baseline outcome expectancies of fruit and vegetable intake at post-workshop

    Baseline (before the workshop, T1), and T2 (immediately after the workshop).

  • Changes from baseline intention to express more appreciation at post-workshop and 2-week

    Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), and 2-week post-workshop (T3).

  • Changes from baseline intention to criticize less at post-workshop and 2-week

    Baseline (before the workshop, T1), T2 (immediately after the workshop), and 2-week post-workshop (T3).

  • +11 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

More Appreciation

EXPERIMENTAL

A 6-minute engaging video will be shown, illustrating examples where a mother initially withholds her appreciation for her son's effort in school and later express it. The video will also capture the effect on the child and the family. Attributional discussion questions will follow to elicit positive outcomes of expressing appreciation and the negative outcomes of withholding appreciation (e.g., What may be the long-term effects of showing appreciation on your child, family, or on yourself?). Key points will be summarised and reinforced to enhance behavioural intention (Schwarzer \& Luszczynska, 2008). Then the participants will be asked to plan by indicating when (e.g., Saturday afternoon), what (e.g., child helping a younger sibling prepare for a dictation test), and how (e.g., "I can see that you gave up your leisure time to help your sister with the spelling. Thank you!") they would express appreciation to their children.

Behavioral: More appreciation

Less Criticism

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will watch a 6-minute video showing examples of a father criticising his son, which will be replaced by positive communication later, and the different reactions evoked in the child and the family. Then, participants will have an attributional discussion on the negative effects of criticism (e.g., negative effect on self-worth and motivation) and positive outcomes of using constructive feedback (e.g., promptly identifying undesirable behaviours without relating to personal traits or abilities). In small groups, they will work out alternatives (i.e., constructive feedback; termed "positive reminder" in the intervention) to criticism, and each plan and write down when (e.g., after school), what (e.g., low test marks), and how (e.g., "How do you prepare for the tests?)

Behavioral: Less criticism

Fruit and Vegetable

EXPERIMENTAL

This workshop will emphasise the importance of consuming at least 5 portions of fruit and vegetable daily for a healthy diet, and aim to boost participants' self-efficacy in achieving this. Participants will be presented with examples of one portion of fruit or vegetable, and then create their own recipes. They will also consider how to overcome obstacles of consuming more portions. Each participant will set goals and write down plans on when, where, what, and how they would increase their fruit and vegetable intake of their children and family as a whole.

Behavioral: More Fruit and Vegetable

Interventions

More Appreciation
Less criticismBEHAVIORAL
Less Criticism
Fruit and Vegetable

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Parents who are Cantonese-speaking, able to complete study questionnaire, and who have children attending p.4 to p.6 will be included.

You may not qualify if:

  • Parents with active psychiatric problems, suicidal ideations, personality disorders, emotional problems, and mental retardartion will be excluded from the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Fung SSW, Lam TH, Sun Y, Man PKW, Ip JCM, Wan ANT, Stewart S, Ho SY. A cluster randomized controlled trial of more appreciation and less criticism in Hong Kong parents. J Fam Psychol. 2020 Sep;34(6):731-739. doi: 10.1037/fam0000628. Epub 2020 Jan 16.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Vegetables

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

FoodDiet, Food, and NutritionPhysiological PhenomenaFood and Beverages

Study Officials

  • Samantha Fung, PhD

    The University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
The person recruiting participants and the participants enrolled are not blinded to the allocation status. Double blinding in cluster RCTs for psychosocial or behavioural interventions is often difficult to implement.
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study is a cluster randomised controlled trial with three arms: more appreciation arm (MA), less criticism arm (LC), and more fruit and vegetable arm (FV).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2020

First Posted

June 24, 2020

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion

May 31, 2013

Study Completion

May 31, 2013

Last Updated

June 24, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Generally, individual participant data will not be shared with a third party. People not involved in the project can check the data availability from the principal investigator.