NCT04438226

Brief Summary

Rationale: In the Netherlands the two main surgical approaches for hemiarthroplasty are the posterolateral and the direct lateral approach. Currently there is no conclusive evidence which of these two approaches results in better patient outcomes. Objective: Assessing the patient outcome comparing the posterolateral with the direct lateral approach in patients being treated with cemented hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fractures. Study design: A randomised controlled multi-center superiority trial and natural experiment with an economic evaluation alongside. Study population: All patients older than 18 years with a femoral neck fracture whereby treatment with cemented hemiarthroplasty is recommended according the national guidelines. Intervention: Treatment with cemented hemiarthroplasty using the posterolateral approach. Standard intervention to be compared to: Treatment with cemented hemiarthroplasty using the direct lateral approach. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is the patient-rated quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) at 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes are: ADL functionality (KATZ), Balance test (SPPB), Tendency to Fall (FES-I), Pain (NRS), Re-interventions, Mobility, Discharge destination, Complications, and cost-effectiveness. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The different approaches in the two treatment arms of the randomised controlled trial are widely used techniques in the Netherlands and many of the outcome measures are part of the standard clinical follow-up after hip fracture. Therefore, there is no extra risk or burden for participating patients, except for the time to complete some additional follow-up measurements. The primary outcome measurement and secondary outcomes, will be assessed through questionnaires online, by hardcopy or by phone at baseline, 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The assessment of the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) balance test, will be performed by one of the study researchers or nurse practitioner to protect continuity and feasibility.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
555

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2017

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 11, 2019

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 18, 2020

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 7, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 7, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

December 21, 2022

Status Verified

December 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

4.1 years

First QC Date

June 11, 2019

Last Update Submit

December 20, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • EQ-5D-5L

    The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system assesses health in five dimensions (MOBILITY, SELF-CARE, USUAL ACTIVITIES, PAIN / DISCOMFORT, ANXIETY / DEPRESSION), each of which has five levels of response (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems/unable to). This part of the EQ-5D questionnaire provides a descriptive profile that can be used to generate a health state profile. Health state index scores generally range from less than 0 (where 0 is the value of a health state equivalent to dead; negative values representing values as worse than dead) to 1 (the value of full health), with higher scores indicating higher health utility. The second part of the questionnaire consists of a visual analogue scale (VAS) on which the patient rates his/her perceived health from 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health).

    at 6 months after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Re-interventions

    at 6 months after surgery

  • SPPB

    at 4 months after surgery

  • FES-I

    at 6 months after surgery

  • NRS

    at 6 months after surgery

  • KATZ

    at 6 months after surgery

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Posterolateral

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients treated with a hemiarthroplasty using the posterolateral approach

Procedure: Surgical approach

Direct lateral

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients treated with a hemiarthroplasty using the direct lateral approach

Procedure: Surgical approach

Interventions

The surgical approach of hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture

Direct lateralPosterolateral

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ≥ 18 years at time of trauma
  • Acute hip fracture
  • Hemiarthroplasty as recommended treatment according the national guidelines
  • Dutch or English fluency and literacy
  • Informed consent or by proxy in patients with mental impairment

You may not qualify if:

  • Multi-trauma-patient (ISS \> 15)
  • Secondary surgery after failed internal fixation
  • Patients with a known metastatic disease and a confirmed pathological fracture of the hip
  • Fracture \> 7 days at time of surgery
  • High risk of non-compliance/adherence to study procedures (e.g. no Dutch residency during follow-up period, or other factors that impair follow-up data collection)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis

Amsterdam, North Holland, 1090 HM, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Tol MCJM, Willigenburg NW, Rasker AJ, Willems HC, Gosens T, Heetveld MJ, Schotanus MGM, Eggen B, Kormos M, van der Pas SL, van der Vaart AW, Goslings JC, Poolman RW; APOLLO Research Group. Posterolateral or Direct Lateral Surgical Approach for Hemiarthroplasty After a Hip Fracture: A Randomized Clinical Trial Alongside a Natural Experiment. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2350765. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50765.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hip Fractures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Femoral FracturesFractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesHip InjuriesLeg Injuries

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2019

First Posted

June 18, 2020

Study Start

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion

January 7, 2022

Study Completion

July 7, 2022

Last Updated

December 21, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-12

Locations