Anterior vs Posterior Approach for Hip Hemiarthroplasty
Does the Anterior or Posterior Approach to the Hip Provide Superior Functional Recovery After Recovery After Performing Hip Hemiarthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
10
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Randomized trial to evaluate the role of the anterior vs posterior approach regarding hemiarthroplasty of the hip. The Investigators' hypothesis is that the muscle sparing anterior approach may result in improved function in the short term, which may allow shorter hospital stay and quicker return to prior level of function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 28, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2025
CompletedJune 6, 2025
June 1, 2025
10 years
March 23, 2018
June 3, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Functional outcomes
Harris Hip Score. Score ranges from 0-100 The higher the HHS, the less dysfunction. A total score of \<70 is considered a poor result; 70-80 is considered fair, 80-90 is good, and 90-100 is an excellent result
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Anterior approach
EXPERIMENTALPatient's undergoing an anterior approach to the hip
Posterior Approach
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient's undergoing an posterior approach to the hip
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eligible patients will include all patients that were previously ambulatory at some level who sustain a displaced femoral neck fracture that given functional status, age, and comorbidities will require a hemi-arthroplasty for definitive treatment.
- Ages 65-99
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who will be excluded from the study are all patients who are non ambulatory at baseline.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2018
First Posted
July 12, 2021
Study Start
September 28, 2015
Primary Completion
October 1, 2025
Study Completion
October 1, 2025
Last Updated
June 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Database that is kept on site that may be reviewed.