These Studies Assess Surgeons' Physical and Ergonomic Workloads. Study 1 Compares Laparoscopic vs. Hugo RAS Robotic Approaches for Rectal Resection. Study 2 Compares Hugo RAS vs. Da Vinci Xi for Prostatectomy. Both Track Physiological Stress, Surgical Strain Phases, and Exerted Force.
ERGOROB
The ERGOROB Project (ERGOnomics in Surgical ROBotics)
1 other identifier
interventional
10
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The ERGOROB (ERGOnomics in surgical ROBotics) study is an observational research project focused on the physical well-being of surgeons.Why is this study important?Surgeons perform complex, lengthy procedures that can lead to severe physical strain, awkward postures, and repetitive movements.This physical burden often causes musculoskeletal disorders, which can negatively impact a doctor's health and potentially shorten their career.By objectively measuring these physical demands, researchers aim to improve the design of surgical systems and training protocols.Preserving a surgeon's health and expertise ultimately enhances the quality of care provided to patients.What exactly is being studied?The research is divided into two comparative areas:Study 1: Compares the physical strain on doctors performing bowel surgery (Low Anterior Resection of the Rectum) using standard "keyhole" (laparoscopic) methods versus a robotic-assisted system called the Hugo RAS.Study 2: Compares the physical demands of using two different robotic surgical platforms (the Hugo RAS and the Da Vinci Xi) during prostate surgery (Radical Prostatectomy).What does this mean for patients?In this specific study, the surgeons are the subjects being evaluated, not the patients.Patients receive their standard, planned surgical treatment without any alterations.During the operation, the participating surgeon will wear specialized wireless equipment, including a 3D motion capture suit, muscle activity sensors, and sensorized gloves to measure hand force.The procedure is also video recorded to analyze the surgeon's movements and workflow.All wearable equipment has been thoroughly pre-tested in a simulated environment to guarantee it does not interfere with the surgeon's dexterity or comfort while operating.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 18, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2028
March 18, 2026
March 1, 2026
2.1 years
March 10, 2026
March 13, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Surgeon Muscle Activity (Root Mean Square)
Assessment of surgeon muscle workload measured using WaveX wireless surface electromyography (sEMG) sensors placed on the trapezius, erector spinae, biceps brachii, and forearm extensor muscles. The parameter evaluated is the Root Mean Square (RMS) value for muscle activity. Measured continuously during each of the surgical procedures per participating surgeon. Unit of Measure: Microvolts (or specify your exact electrical potential unit)
Intraoperatively
Surgeon Posture and Upper Limb Kinematics
Evaluation of the surgeon's physical exertion and ergonomic posture deviations. Measured using the Xsens 3D Motion Capture Suit. Specific parameters include trunk flexion and lateral bending angles, shoulder and elbow range of motion (ROM), and the frequency and amplitude of repetitive movements of the upper limbs
Continuously during each of the 10 surgical procedures per participating surgeon (real-time acquisition)
Surgeon Hand and Finger Manipulation Forces
Assessment of the physical force exerted by the surgeon's hands when interacting with the robotic consoles (Hugo RAS vs. Da Vinci Xi). Measured using GRIP VERSATEK sensorized gloves. Parameters include peak forces, average forces, and force variability.
Continuously during each of the 10 surgical procedures per participating urological surgeon (real-time acquisition)
Surgeon Muscle Fatigue (Median Frequency)
Assessment of surgeon muscle fatigue via spectral analysis, measured using WaveX wireless surface electromyography (sEMG) sensors placed on the trapezius, erector spinae, biceps brachii, and forearm extensor muscles. The parameter evaluated is the median frequency of the sEMG signals. Measured continuously during each surgical procedures per participating surgeon. Unit of Measure: Hertz (Hz)
Intraoperatively
Surgeon Muscle Strain (Sustained Activation)
Assessment of surgeon muscle strain, measured using WaveX wireless surface electromyography (sEMG) sensors placed on the trapezius, erector spinae, biceps brachii, and forearm extensor muscles. The parameter evaluated is the duration of periods of sustained muscle activation and high levels of co-contraction. Measured continuously during each surgical procedures per participating surgeon. Unit of Measure: Seconds (or minutes)
Intraoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Colorectal Surgeons
EXPERIMENTAL5 experienced colorectal surgeons acting as their own controls. Each surgeon will perform 10 procedures: 5 using the standard laparoscopic approach and 5 using the Hugo RAS robotic system.
Urological Surgeons
EXPERIMENTAL5 experienced urological surgeons acting as their own controls. Each surgeon will perform 10 procedures: 5 using the Hugo RAS robotic system and 5 using the Da Vinci Xi robotic system.
Interventions
This study evaluates the ergonomic impact of different surgical platforms on operating surgeons. The "interventions" are the surgical systems used during standard procedures:Study 1: Compares the standard laparoscopic approach (control) versus the Medtronic Hugo™ RAS robotic system during Low Anterior Resection of the Rectum.Study 2: Directly compares the Medtronic Hugo™ RAS system versus the Intuitive da Vinci® Xi System during Radical Prostatectomy.Distinguishing Feature: Unlike trials focused on patient outcomes, the surgeon is the subject of investigation here. During live surgeries, surgeons are continuously monitored using wearable assessment tools: Xsens 3D Motion Capture suits for posture and kinematics , WaveX wireless sEMG sensors for muscle activity and fatigue , and GRIP VERSATEK sensorized gloves (Study 2 only) for hand force. This enables real-time, objective ergonomic data collection.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must be an experienced general surgeon specializing in colorectal surgery (Study 1) OR an experienced urological surgeon (Study 2).
- Age between 40 and 55 years for colorectal surgeons, or between 40 and 50 years for urological surgeons.
- For Study 1: Proficient in performing Low Anterior Resection of the Rectum using both standard laparoscopic techniques and the Hugo RAS robotic system, with over 30 robotic and laparoscopic procedures completed.
- For Study 2: Expertise in robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy using both the Hugo RAS and Da Vinci Xi systems, with over 20 radical prostatectomies performed on both platforms.
- Willingness to undergo extensive data collection during surgical procedures.
- Provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- \- None.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Burdorf A, Naaktgeboren B, de Groot HC. Occupational risk factors for low back pain among sedentary workers. J Occup Med. 1993 Dec;35(12):1213-20.
PMID: 8113925BACKGROUNDAghilinejad M,Ehsani AA,Talebi A,Koohpayehzadeh J,Dehghan N
BACKGROUNDEpstein S, Sparer EH, Tran BN, Ruan QZ, Dennerlein JT, Singhal D, Lee BT. Prevalence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Surgeons and Interventionalists: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2018 Feb 21;153(2):e174947. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4947. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
PMID: 29282463BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PI
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2026
First Posted
March 18, 2026
Study Start
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2028
Last Updated
March 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share