Midline Versus Paramedian Approaches in Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
A Pilot Study Comparing Midline Versus Paramedian Approaches to the Lumbar Spine for Single- or Two-Level Fusions in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
For the increasing numbers of patients undergoing fusion procedures for the degenerative lumbar spine, infection and re-operation can negatively impact outcomes. Numerous observational and retrospective reviews have shown advantages to para-median versus midline approaches; however, recent systematic reviews have shown a need for a well-powered, prospective randomized control trials comparing both exposures. As a step towards a long-term goal of an RCT to address this issue, the purpose of this pilot study is to gather initial data to examine whether operative approach impacts the short-term infection rate, re-operation rate, length of stay, and overall costs to the system. Patients deemed appropriate surgical candidates with single or two-level degenerative spondylolisthesis will be approached for participation, and randomized into either the midline or paramedian group. Initial follow-ups will be at 2 and 6 weeks, and 3 months. Infection rates, inpatient and outpatient adverse events, re-operation rates, radiation exposure and costs will be determined. Cost effectiveness analysis will be estimated comparing each procedure using a bottom-up estimation. Post-operative wound infection can have a significant effect on patient short and long term outcomes. If a significant difference in infection rate is demonstrated, as well as lower re-operation rates, shorter stays, and decreased overall costs, adoption of paramedian approaches to single or two-level fusions of the lumbar spine might be suggested, providing fuel for a full-scale RCT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 17, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 30, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedAugust 21, 2024
August 1, 2024
7.9 years
November 13, 2017
August 19, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Infection rate
infection will be tracked using the Center for Disease Control (CDC) criteria for diagnosing both deep and superficial infections. Deep infections will be diagnosed with deep wound cultures. The CDC criteria for diagnosing superficial infection is erythema, drainage, dehiscence and "surgeon opinion", allowing for significant subjectively in superficial infections.
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Midline Approach
EXPERIMENTALA midline surgical approach will be used for the exposure required to complete the lumbar fusion.
Paramedian Approach
EXPERIMENTALA paramedian (i.e. Wiltse) surgical approach will be used for the exposure required to complete the lumbar fusion.
Interventions
Comparison of 2 surgical approaches used to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis via one- and two-level fusion
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \) surgical candidates with single or two level degenerative spondylolisthesis with the following clinical findings:
- a clinical history of back, buttock and leg pain with walking or standing that is improved when lying, sitting or bending forward
- a clinical history of leg symptoms that are greater than or equal to back symptoms with walking or standing
- greater than 6 months of symptoms with failed conservative care
- \) sufficiently fluent in English to provide informed consent and complete questionnaires with or without the need of an interpreter.
You may not qualify if:
- \) clinical history of osteoporotic fracture or chronic oral steroid use;
- \) previous posterior lumbar spinal surgery (excluding prior microdiscectomy); and
- \) patients who have evidence of neurological disorders that affect physical function (e.g. peripheral neuropathy), neuromuscular disorders (e.g. multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's etc.) or systemic illness (e.g. inflammatory arthritis) that affects physical function
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
QEII Health Sciences Centre - Halifax Infirmary site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H3A7, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2017
First Posted
November 17, 2017
Study Start
January 30, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
August 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share