Erector Spinae Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block In Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery
The Feasibility and Efficacy of Erector Spinae Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block In Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study to compare erector spinae block to transversus abdominis plane block in bariatric surgeries regarding analgesic efficacy and postoperative oxygenation and respiratory complications
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 31, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 20, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 20, 2022
CompletedMarch 18, 2022
March 1, 2022
1.5 years
May 31, 2020
March 17, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
efficacy of block
The analgesic efficacy of erector spinae block versus TAP block assessed by visual analogue score(range from 1 denoted the least pain to 10 as the worst pain) in 24hr in laparoscopic bariatric surgery.
first 24 hours postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (1)
failure rate
first hour postoperatively
Other Outcomes (4)
feasibility of block
preoperative
ambulation
24 hour
arterial oxygen tension to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio
12, 24 hours postoperative
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
TAP block group
EXPERIMENTALthe TAP block will be given by a high frequency linear ultrasound transducer of Siemens acuson x300 3-5MHz ultrasound . a blunted tip , 20-gauge, short bevel needle (Pajunk Sonoplex, Geisingen, Germany) will be used under direct ultrasound visualization, . After confirming the correct placement of the needle and the negative aspiration probe anaesthetic substance will be injected along the subcostal line in the transversus abdominis plane 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine(10) , and the dissection of the plane was observed. The block will be performed bilaterally.
ESP group
EXPERIMENTALthe Erector Spinae block will be given by a high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer of Siemens acuson x300 3-5MHz ultrasound .A blunted tip , 20-gauge, short bevel needle (Pajunk Sonoplex, Geisingen, Germany) will be used under strict aseptic precautions until the tip is deep to erector spinae muscle, The block will be performed bilaterally by injecting 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (20 mL into each side) into the fascial plane between the deep surface of the Erector Spinae muscle and the transverse processes of the lumbar vertebrae laterally
Interventions
Local Anesthetic used in both blocks
Ultrasound used to aid in the blocks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient age \>18 \<60
- Obese patients ; Body mass index(BMI) 40-50 kg/m2
- Both sexes
- American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical status classes II and III
- Patients scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery i.e. sleeve gastrectomy and/or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)surgeries
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal of regional block
- Patients with neurological, psychological disorders or those lacking cooperation
- Patients scheduled for concomitant laparoscopic cholecystectomy or paraumbilical hernia repair or those with history of previous bariatric surgery or obstructive sleep apnea
- Patients with anatomic abnormalities at site of injection, skin lesions or wounds at site of proposed needle insertion.
- Patients with bleeding disorders defined as (INR \>2) and/ or (platelet count \<100,000/µL)
- Patients with hepatic disease e.g. liver cell failure or hepatic malignancy or hepatic enlargement.
- Patients who are allergic to amide local anesthetics.
- Cases converted to open surgery will also be excluded from the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Medicine
Cairo, 11562, Egypt
Related Publications (3)
Tulgar S, Selvi O, Kapakli MS. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Different Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgeries: Case Series. Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2018 Feb 18;2018:3947281. doi: 10.1155/2018/3947281. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29670771BACKGROUNDAbdallah FW, Laffey JG, Halpern SH, Brull R. Duration of analgesic effectiveness after the posterior and lateral transversus abdominis plane block techniques for transverse lower abdominal incisions: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):721-35. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet214. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
PMID: 23811424BACKGROUNDMittal T, Dey A, Siddhartha R, Nali A, Sharma B, Malik V. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic gastric sleeve resection: a randomized single blinded case control study. Surg Endosc. 2018 Dec;32(12):4985-4989. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6261-6. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
PMID: 29869078BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesia lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 31, 2020
First Posted
June 4, 2020
Study Start
August 20, 2020
Primary Completion
February 1, 2022
Study Completion
February 20, 2022
Last Updated
March 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03