NCT04417179

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study to compare erector spinae block to transversus abdominis plane block in bariatric surgeries regarding analgesic efficacy and postoperative oxygenation and respiratory complications

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 31, 2020

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 4, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 20, 2020

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2022

Completed
19 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 20, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 18, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

May 31, 2020

Last Update Submit

March 17, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • efficacy of block

    The analgesic efficacy of erector spinae block versus TAP block assessed by visual analogue score(range from 1 denoted the least pain to 10 as the worst pain) in 24hr in laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

    first 24 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • failure rate

    first hour postoperatively

Other Outcomes (4)

  • feasibility of block

    preoperative

  • ambulation

    24 hour

  • arterial oxygen tension to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio

    12, 24 hours postoperative

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

TAP block group

EXPERIMENTAL

the TAP block will be given by a high frequency linear ultrasound transducer of Siemens acuson x300 3-5MHz ultrasound . a blunted tip , 20-gauge, short bevel needle (Pajunk Sonoplex, Geisingen, Germany) will be used under direct ultrasound visualization, . After confirming the correct placement of the needle and the negative aspiration probe anaesthetic substance will be injected along the subcostal line in the transversus abdominis plane 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine(10) , and the dissection of the plane was observed. The block will be performed bilaterally.

Procedure: transversus abdominis blockDrug: Bupivacaine 0.25% Injectable SolutionDevice: Siemens Acuson x300 3-5MHz Ultrasound

ESP group

EXPERIMENTAL

the Erector Spinae block will be given by a high-frequency linear ultrasound transducer of Siemens acuson x300 3-5MHz ultrasound .A blunted tip , 20-gauge, short bevel needle (Pajunk Sonoplex, Geisingen, Germany) will be used under strict aseptic precautions until the tip is deep to erector spinae muscle, The block will be performed bilaterally by injecting 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (20 mL into each side) into the fascial plane between the deep surface of the Erector Spinae muscle and the transverse processes of the lumbar vertebrae laterally

Procedure: Erector spinae blockDrug: Bupivacaine 0.25% Injectable SolutionDevice: Siemens Acuson x300 3-5MHz Ultrasound

Interventions

transversus abdominis block

TAP block group

Erector spinae block

ESP group

Local Anesthetic used in both blocks

ESP groupTAP block group

Ultrasound used to aid in the blocks

ESP groupTAP block group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient age \>18 \<60
  • Obese patients ; Body mass index(BMI) 40-50 kg/m2
  • Both sexes
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical status classes II and III
  • Patients scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery i.e. sleeve gastrectomy and/or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)surgeries

You may not qualify if:

  • Refusal of regional block
  • Patients with neurological, psychological disorders or those lacking cooperation
  • Patients scheduled for concomitant laparoscopic cholecystectomy or paraumbilical hernia repair or those with history of previous bariatric surgery or obstructive sleep apnea
  • Patients with anatomic abnormalities at site of injection, skin lesions or wounds at site of proposed needle insertion.
  • Patients with bleeding disorders defined as (INR \>2) and/ or (platelet count \<100,000/µL)
  • Patients with hepatic disease e.g. liver cell failure or hepatic malignancy or hepatic enlargement.
  • Patients who are allergic to amide local anesthetics.
  • Cases converted to open surgery will also be excluded from the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Medicine

Cairo, 11562, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Tulgar S, Selvi O, Kapakli MS. Erector Spinae Plane Block for Different Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgeries: Case Series. Case Rep Anesthesiol. 2018 Feb 18;2018:3947281. doi: 10.1155/2018/3947281. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 29670771BACKGROUND
  • Abdallah FW, Laffey JG, Halpern SH, Brull R. Duration of analgesic effectiveness after the posterior and lateral transversus abdominis plane block techniques for transverse lower abdominal incisions: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):721-35. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet214. Epub 2013 Jun 27.

    PMID: 23811424BACKGROUND
  • Mittal T, Dey A, Siddhartha R, Nali A, Sharma B, Malik V. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic gastric sleeve resection: a randomized single blinded case control study. Surg Endosc. 2018 Dec;32(12):4985-4989. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6261-6. Epub 2018 Jun 4.

    PMID: 29869078BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Bupivacaine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAmines

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Anesthesia lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2020

First Posted

June 4, 2020

Study Start

August 20, 2020

Primary Completion

February 1, 2022

Study Completion

February 20, 2022

Last Updated

March 18, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Locations