Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Opioid Based General Anesthesia During Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery
Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Opioid Based General Anesthesia During Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery; a Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
bilateral continuous erector spinae plane blockade may represent a valuable alternatives to thoracіc epidurals analgaesіa in treatment of thoracic neuropathic pain. There were 3 cases reported in 2017 suggested that the erector spinae plane block provides visceral abdominal analgesia in bariatric surgery and at end of the report they recommended further clinical investigation. The investigators hypothesіzed that performing the erector spinae plane (ESP) block at T7 would provide effective abdominal analgaesіa іn patients undergone laparoscopic bariatric surgery. The investigators aimed to compare the analgesic effect of erector spinae plane block and opioid based general anesthesia for laparoscopic bariatric surgeries.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 27, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 10, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2019
CompletedJanuary 14, 2020
January 1, 2020
7 months
December 27, 2018
January 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The duration of analgesic effect in minutes
The duration of analgesic effect is indicated by the 1st analgesic requisite after measurement of VAS
defined as the time n minutes between finishing the block technique in ESPB group or after administration of nalbuphine in GA-group, and the request of first dose of postoperative analgesics) when VAS is more than 4 during the 1st 8 hours postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (10)
mean arterial blood pressure changes
intraoperative and post extubation in the 1st hour
Nalbuphine consumption
total dose given post operatively up to 1 hour postoperatively
visual analogue scale (VAS) for assessment of postoperative pain
at 30 minutes, 45 minutes and 60 minutes, 4 hours and 8 hours after surgery
Block failure rate
in the first hour postoperatively
Resumption of peristalsis
postoperatively up to 48 hours postoperatively
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (5)
demographic data
during 30 minutes preoperatively
duration of surgery
from skin incision up to skin closure
weight
during 30 minutes preoperatively
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
erector spinae plane block group (ESPB) n=14
EXPERIMENTALBilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block will be performed in the lateral position at T7 vertebrae and before induction of GA. 20 ml of local anesthetic solution (20 ml bupivacaine (Sunnypivacaine, Sunny pharmaceutical, Egypt) 0.25%) will be injected in-plane into the ESP. This procedure will be repeated on the other side taking care not to exceed the maximum recommended doses (2 mg/kg of IBW for bupivacaine) and then GA will be conducted .
general anesthesia group (GA) n= 14
ACTIVE COMPARATORthese patients will receive iv nalbuphine in dose of 2mg /kg according to ideal body weight after induction of GA
Interventions
ESPB on both sides at T7 before GA
in nalbuphine for analgesia after GA
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient age \>18 \<60
- Obese patients 40˂ Body mass index(BMI) ˂50
- Both sexes
- American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) physical status classes II and III
- Patients scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery i.e. sleeve gastrectomy and/or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)surgeries
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal of regional block
- Patients with neurological, psychological disorders or those lacking cooperation
- Patients scheduled for concomitant laparoscopic cholecystectomy or paraumbilical hernia repair or those with history of previous bariatric surgery or obstructive sleep apnea
- Patients with anatomic abnormalities at site of injection, skin lesions or wounds at site of proposed needle insertion.
- Patients with bleeding disorders defined as (INR \>2) and/ or (platelet count \<100,000/µL)
- Patients with hepatic disease e.g. liver cell failure or hepatic malignancy or hepatic enlargement.
- Patients who are allergic to amide local anesthetics.
- Cases converted to open surgery will also be excluded from the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Hany Mohammed El-Hadi Shoukat Mohammed
Giza, 12211, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer of anesthesia, pain management and surgical ICU
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 27, 2018
First Posted
January 10, 2019
Study Start
February 1, 2019
Primary Completion
August 30, 2019
Study Completion
September 30, 2019
Last Updated
January 14, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- 9 months
- Access Criteria
- Researchgate.gov
yes