Success Metrics

Clinical Success Rate
100.0%

Based on 3 completed trials

Completion Rate
100%(3/3)
Active Trials
0(0%)
Results Posted
0%(0 trials)

Phase Distribution

Ph not_applicable
3
100%

Phase Distribution

0

Early Stage

0

Mid Stage

0

Late Stage

Phase Distribution3 total trials
N/ANon-phased studies
3(100.0%)

Highest Phase Reached

Unknown

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

100.0%

3 of 3 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

0

trials recruiting

Total Trials

3

all time

Status Distribution
Completed(3)

Detailed Status

Completed3

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
3
Active
0
Success Rate
100.0%
Most Advanced
N/A

Trials by Phase

N/A3 (100.0%)

Trials by Status

completed3100%

Recent Activity

0 active trials
Showing 3 of 3
completednot_applicable

Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Bariatric Surgery

NCT06564610
completednot_applicable

Erector Spinae Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block In Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

NCT04417179
completednot_applicable

Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia of Adult Patients Undergoing Ovarian Cancer Surgery

NCT04434339

Clinical Trials (3)

Showing 3 of 3 trials
NCT06564610Not Applicable

Laparoscopic Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Bariatric Surgery

Completed
NCT04417179Not Applicable

Erector Spinae Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block In Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery

Completed
NCT04434339Not Applicable

Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia of Adult Patients Undergoing Ovarian Cancer Surgery

Completed

All 3 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Total Trials
3