Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Augments the Effects of Gamified, Mobile Attention Bias Modification
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present study tested whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) across the prefrontal cortex (PFC), versus sham stimulation, effectively augments the beneficial effects of a gamified attention bias modification training (ABMT) mobile app.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1 anxiety
Started Feb 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 12, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2020
CompletedApril 17, 2020
April 1, 2020
11 months
April 12, 2020
April 15, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Self-reported negative mood symptoms
Self report using the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS); Higher scores mean more severe negative mood/worse outcomes (scores ranging from 0-42)
Day 1
Self-reported subjective state anxiety
Self report of state anxiety using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI); Higher scores mean greater anxiety severity/worse outcomes (scores ranging from 20-80).
Day 1
Threat bias, or dsyregulated attention towards threat, measured via computer assay
Using the computerized, reaction time-based cognitive assessment task, the "dot probe", biased attention towards or away from threat-relevant information will be assessed based on reaction-time based scoring procedures. Higher scores mean greater bias/worse outcomes
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Magnitude of respiratory sinus arrhythmia, or variability in heart rate due to respiration rate
Day 1
Study Arms (2)
tDCS Active
EXPERIMENTALTranscranial direct current stimulation with ABMT
tDCS sham
SHAM COMPARATORTranscranial direct current sham stimulation with ABMT
Interventions
mobile attention bias modification training for anxiety, using the app Personal Zen
Soterix 1X1 tDCS Limited Total Energy (LTE) Stimulator
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- mild - moderate anxiety
You may not qualify if:
- psychotic disorder
- substance use disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hunter College of the City University of New York
New York, New York, 10065, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tracy Dennis, PhD
Hunter College, CUNY
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Primary Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 12, 2020
First Posted
April 16, 2020
Study Start
February 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 15, 2019
Study Completion
December 15, 2019
Last Updated
April 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share