Breathing for Adolescent Stress Reduction Feasibility RCT
Slow-Breathing Curriculum for Stress Reduction in High School Students: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
43
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to test a simple slow breathing curriculum for reducing stress among high school students. The curriculum was developed by the Health and Human Performance Foundation and implemented for this study at a public high school in Colorado, United States.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable anxiety
Started Jan 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable anxiety
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 20, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 2, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 29, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2022
CompletedMarch 4, 2022
March 1, 2022
13 days
February 10, 2022
March 1, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Feasibility - compliance with breathing curriculum
Number of participants completing the breathing practices
5 weeks
Feasibility - compliance with effectiveness assessments
Number of participants completing the STAI and CO2TT assessments
7.5 weeks
Feasibility - curriculum ease and tolerability
Ease and tolerability of the breathing curriculum was measured as the average ratings on a scale of 0 to 3 (worst to best) of responses about the curriculum's ease, usefulness, and tolerability.
1-week followup period
Feasibility - effectiveness assessments ease and tolerability
Ease and tolerability of the preliminary effectiveness assessments was measured as the average ratings on a scale of 0 to 3 (worst to best) of responses about the effectiveness assessments' ease and tolerability.
1-week followup period
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in in-the-moment stress levels from before to after breathing exercises, as measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, State (STAI-State) Scale, short version.
5 weeks
Change in general stress levels from before to after the 5-week curriculum, as measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Trait (STAI-Trait) Scale.
1.5-week baseline period and 1-week followup period
Study Arms (3)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONStudents in the control class received regular class instruction during the 5 weeks. This instruction did not deviate from regular instruction that was provided to all classes, including the intervention classes. During the intervention period, control group students completed the assessments once per week. The control class is considered a treatment-as-usual active control.
Self-Paced Breathing
EXPERIMENTALThe self-paced slow diaphragmatic breathing intervention provided guidance for participants to breathe at a slower pace than normal with brief, organic pauses after each inhale and exhale, and with exhales longer than inhales. Participants were guided to breathe at their own pace while following these principles of longer exhales and brief pauses after each inhale/exhale. They were invited to slow their pace when ready, both during each 5-minute session and over the course of the 5 weeks.
Guide-Paced Breathing
EXPERIMENTALThe guide-paced slow diaphragmatic breathing intervention comprised slow breathing with all exhales twice as long as the inhales; e.g., a 3-second inhale was followed by a 6-second exhale. Participants were instructed to breathe in sync with the guided pace. The breathing pace slowed over the 5 weeks: for weeks 1-2, the breath pattern comprised a 3-second inhale followed by a 6-second exhale; for weeks 3-4, the timing was 4 and 8, respectively; and was 5 and 10 for the last week.
Interventions
The curriculum was based on three key breathing components that have been shown to reduce stress in adolescents: slow breathing; diaphragmatic breathing; and extended exhale breathing. Slow breathing entails breathing at a pace slower than normal breathing. Diaphragmatic breathing focuses on breaths starting from the diaphragm or abdominal areas, with abdominal, then lung, then chest expansion during the inhale and a slow, gradual, full release of air in the reverse direction on the exhale. Extended exhale breathing comprises breathing with the exhalation duration longer, often twice as long, as the inhalation. Two versions of slow diaphragmatic extended exhale breathing were included in this study. For both, participants did the practice while seated comfortably and breathing through the nose, and were guided to increase the inhale and exhale durations over the 5 weeks. Students followed 5-minute videos for each session.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Were enrolled at study start (baseline period) in one of four senior (12th grade) English classes taught by the teacher who was recruited for the study;
- Accepted participation in the study, including willingness to abide by the randomization process, by signing student assent on the consent form;
- Had parental permission to participate in the study, indicated by their signing their consent on the consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Chose not to participate; or,
- Did not receive parental permission.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Aspen High School
Aspen, Colorado, 81611, United States
Related Publications (1)
Bentley TGK, Seeber C, Hightower E, Mackenzie B, Wilson R, Velazquez A, Cheng A, Arce NN, Lorenz KA. Slow-Breathing Curriculum for Stress Reduction in High School Students: Lessons Learned From a Feasibility Pilot. Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Jul 1;3:864079. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.864079. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36189008DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tanya GK Bentley, PhD
Health and Human Performance Foundation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2022
First Posted
March 4, 2022
Study Start
January 20, 2021
Primary Completion
February 2, 2021
Study Completion
March 29, 2021
Last Updated
March 4, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03