Comparison of Mindfulness Meditation Tools For College Students
Assisting University Students Self-Manage Stress: Comparison of Mindfulness Meditation Tools
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine what tools best assist university students develop a personal meditation practice to self-manage stress. The two treatment conditions are 1) independent meditation using web-based tools and apps, and 2) independent meditation using web-based tools, apps and EEG-based neurofeedback. Outcomes of interest include acceptability, adherence, changes in mental health (i.e., anxiety, stress), physical health (i.e., sleep, inflammation), resilience, and level of commitment to further practice. Factors related to self-regulation (i.e., interoceptive awareness, self-esteem) will also be assessed as potential outcome moderators.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 6, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 17, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 5, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 5, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2019
CompletedSeptember 26, 2019
September 1, 2019
9 months
December 6, 2017
September 25, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales-21
(DASS-21; Lovibond \& Lovibond, 1995): an abbreviated, 21-item, Likert-style scale to assess levels of distress on three subscales: depression, anxiety and stress, based on how one felt over the past week. The DASS-21 has been used in prior studies assessing the benefits of mindfulness in undergraduate students (Gallego et al., 2014). It consists of 21 items with seven items per subscale, scored on a four-point scale ranging from 0 = did not apply to me at all to 3 = applied to me very much or most of the time. The total score sums all items. Higher scores indicate higher levels of distress.
5 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Big Five personality
Baseline and 5 weeks
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Baseline and 5 weeks
Self-Regulation of Eating Scale
Baseline and 5 weeks
MINDSENS (mindfulness)
Baseline and 5 weeks
Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA)
Baseline and 5 weeks
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Long-term Follow-up Survey
1, 6, and 12 months following completion of the satisfaction follow-up
Satisfaction with Mindfulness Tools
5 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Experimental
EXPERIMENTALindependent meditation using web-based tools, apps, and EEG neurofeedback
Active Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORindependent meditation using web-based tools and apps
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English literate, undergraduates and graduate students attending UConn ages 18 and above (unless they are registered with the participant pool), who agree with the initial terms, are willing to learn basic skills of mindfulness meditation, agree to practice meditating with assigned tools independently and feel able to adhere to the time commitment required for the study. Participants must not currently have a regular seated meditation practice (regular, meaning at least 1x per week).
You may not qualify if:
- participants unable to adhere to the commitment required for the study will be excluded
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Connecticut
Storrs, Connecticut, 06269, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Blair T. Johnson, PhD
University of Connecticut - BOT Distinguished Professor of Psychological Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- BoT Distinguished Professor of Psychological Sciences
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 6, 2017
First Posted
January 17, 2018
Study Start
March 5, 2018
Primary Completion
December 5, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
September 26, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- Data will be available after results have been published.
- Access Criteria
- Data access requests will be reviewed and requestors will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement
De-identified individual participant data for primary and secondary outcome measures will be made available upon request.