Effect of QMix 2in1 as Final Irrigation Protocol on Periapical Healing
Effect of QMix 2-in-1 as Final Irrigation Protocol on Periapical Healing After Single-visit Root Canal Treatment: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aim: To compare the 12-month radiographic outcome of root canal treatment with and without the additional use of QMix 2-in-1 (Dentsply Tulsa, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) irrigation solution. Methodology: The study included 60 single-rooted teeth with periapical radiolucency of 60 patients, randomized into two groups using randomized block design with block sizes of 10 patients in each. Root canals were prepared with WaveOne Gold files (Dentsply Sirona, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and irrigation was performed with 5 mL 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) using side-vented needles during instrumentation. The final irrigation protocol was performed using 5 mL 2.5% NaOCl (n= 30) or 5 ml QMix 2-in-1 (n=30). Then the root canals were irrigated with 5 mL of distilled water and filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer (Dentsply Sirona), using the cold lateral compaction technique. The patients were recalled after 12 months and evaluated radiographically according to perapical index (PAI) scores. Pre and post-treatment PAI scores were compared and teeth were considered 'healthy' (PAI ≤ 2) or 'diseased' (PAI ≥ 3). The Mann Whitney U test was used to compare the differences between the post-operative and follow-up images of the treatment groups. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was applied to examine the changes in PAI score from baseline to the follow-up evaluation in each group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2020
CompletedApril 17, 2020
April 1, 2020
1 year
April 8, 2020
April 16, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Radiographic healing after 12 months follow-up.
After the completion of treatment of both control and QMix 2in1 group, the status of periapical healing was assessed.
Time frame is 12 months for this study. Each patient will recall for an appointment and the status of the tooth will evaluate radiographically.
Study Arms (2)
control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe root canal was prepared using the WaveOne Gold file reciprocation system with VDW Silver motor. WaveOne Gold #25 (0.07) file was used for instrumentation. For larger canals, #35 (0.06) and #45 (0.05) files were used after the #25 file. During instrumentation procedure, irrigation was applied with 5mL 2.5% NaOCl using a side-vented needles. The final irrigation was applied with 5mL NaOCl and 5mL sterile saline in the control group.The root canals were dried with sterile paper points and were filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer with the cold lateral condensation method and the entry cavity was restored with composite. All treatments were performed following a standardized procedure by one operator. After completion of the root canal treatment, periapical radiographs were taken using the paralleling technique. All the patients were called for follow-up examination at 12 months, and were examined radiographically.
QMix 2in1
EXPERIMENTALThe root canal was prepared using the WaveOne Gold file reciprocation system with VDW Silver motor. WaveOne Gold #25 (0.07) file was used for instrumentation. For larger canals, #35 (0.06) and #45 (0.05) files were used after the #25 file. During instrumentation procedure, irrigation was applied with 5mL 2.5% NaOCl using a side-vented needles. The final irrigation was applied with 5mL Mix 2in1 and 5mL sterile saline in the experimental group.
Interventions
In QMix 2in1 group root canals were irrigated with Mix as a final irrigation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- necrotic, single root teeth with a periapical lesion (2\>PAI\>5)
You may not qualify if:
- pregnant
- had used antibiotics within the previous week
- allergy to local anesthetic agents
- history of intolerance to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- had uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, hematological disease, or had received or were receiving radiotherapy and periodontal bone loss (visualized radiographically)
- open tooth apex
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cukurova University, Faculty of Dentistry
Adana, 01130, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (5)
Abbaszadegan A, Nabavizadeh M, Hoseini Yekani A, Khayat A. Comparison of Endodontic Treatment Results Yielded from Using Normal Saline with IKI Final Rinse or NaOCl Irrigation: A 30-Month Follow-up Study. Iran Endod J. 2013 Fall;8(4):171-6. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
PMID: 24171024RESULTHolland R, Gomes JE Filho, Cintra LTA, Queiroz IOA, Estrela C. Factors affecting the periapical healing process of endodontically treated teeth. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017 Sep-Oct;25(5):465-476. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0464.
PMID: 29069143RESULTParedes-Vieyra J, Enriquez FJ. Success rate of single- versus two-visit root canal treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.021. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
PMID: 22892729RESULTPai S, Thomas MS. The effect of QMix, an experimental antibacterial root canal irrigant, on removal of canal wall smear layer and debris. J Endod. 2011 Jun;37(6):741; author reply 741-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 May 6. No abstract available.
PMID: 21787479RESULTChandrasekhar V, Amulya V, Rani VS, Prakash TJ, Ranjani AS, Gayathri Ch. Evaluation of biocompatibility of a new root canal irrigant Q Mix 2 in 1- An in vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2013 Jan;16(1):36-40. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.105296.
PMID: 23349574RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Oguz Yoldaş, Professor
University of Cukurova, Faculty of Dentistry, Vice-Dean
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Asistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2020
First Posted
April 16, 2020
Study Start
February 1, 2017
Primary Completion
February 1, 2018
Study Completion
February 1, 2019
Last Updated
April 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share