Study of PXL065 in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)
A 36-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of PXL065 Versus Placebo in Noncirrhotic Biopsy-proven NonAlcoholic SteatoHepatitis (NASH) Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
117
1 country
29
Brief Summary
This study will assess the effect of 3 doses of PXL065 versus placebo on liver fat content in NASH patients after 36 weeks of treatment
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Sep 2020
29 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 25, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 8, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 20, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 29, 2023
CompletedAugust 29, 2023
August 1, 2023
1.8 years
March 23, 2020
June 19, 2023
August 4, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of Liver Fat Content (LFC) (Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction [MRI-PDFF])
MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual. Relative change from baseline to Week 36 was calculated as follows: (LFC at Week 36 - LFC at baseline) / LFC at baseline x 100. The primary analysis was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment, for stratification factors, and for the baseline LFC as a continuous covariate. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.
Baseline and Week 36
Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF) (Wilcoxon Test Sensitivity Analysis)
MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual. The sensitivity analysis was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using a non parametric pairwise Wilcoxon test stratified according to T2DM status and NASH CRN fibrosis scoring system. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.
Baseline and Week 36
Secondary Outcomes (25)
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF)
Baseline and Week 36
Percentage of Responders (Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in LFC) at Week 36
Baseline and Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT)
Baseline to Week 36
Percentage of Responders (Normalization of ALT)
Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST)
Baseline to Week 36
- +20 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Group 1
EXPERIMENTALPXL065 Dose 1
Group 2
EXPERIMENTALPXL065 Dose 2
Group 3
EXPERIMENTALPXL065 Dose 3
Group 4
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo oral tablet
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients have given written informed consent
- Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 50 kg/m²
- For patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: either naive of glucose lowering drug or under stable oral glucose lowering drug
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73m²
- Liver fat content ≥ 8% on MRI-PDFF
- Qualifying liver biopsy (NAS) ≥ 4 and fibrosis score F1, F2 or F3
- Effective contraception for women of child bearing potential
You may not qualify if:
- Evidence of another form of liver disease
- Evidence of liver cirrhosis
- Evidence of hepatic impairment
- Positive serologic evidence of current infectious liver disease
- History of excessive alcohol intake
- Acute cardiovascular disease within 6 months prior to Randomization
- Any disease which in the Investigator's opinion which in the Investigator's opinion would exclude the patient from the study
- Use of non-permitted concomitant medication
- Pregnancy or lactation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Poxel SAlead
Study Sites (29)
Study site 11
Chandler, Arizona, 85224, United States
Study site 12
Glendale, Arizona, 85306, United States
Study site 13
Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States
Study site 21
Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States
Study site 17
Chula Vista, California, 91910, United States
Study site 16
Fresno, California, 93720, United States
Study site 04
Huntington Park, California, 90255, United States
Study site 05
Los Angeles, California, 90057, United States
Study site 22
Orange, California, 92866, United States
Study site 06
Panorama City, California, 90402, United States
Study site 07
Santa Ana, California, 92704, United States
Study site 15
Boca Raton, Florida, 33434, United States
Study site 31
Fort Myers, Florida, 33912, United States
Study site 08
Port Orange, Florida, 32127, United States
Study site 01
Sarasota, Florida, 34240, United States
Study site 28
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50265, United States
Study site 18
Kansas City, Kansas, 61431, United States
Study site 24
Flowood, Mississippi, 39232, United States
Study site 10
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216, United States
Study site 27
East Syracuse, New York, 13057, United States
Study site 14
Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28304, United States
Study site 29
Summerville, South Carolina, 29485, United States
Study site 25
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37411, United States
Study site 30
Clarksville, Tennessee, 37040, United States
Study Site 02
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138, United States
Study site 19
Austin, Texas, 78746, United States
Study site 09
Edinburg, Texas, 78539, United States
Study site 23
Edinburg, Texas, 78539, United States
Pinnacle Clinical Research (Study site 20)
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Limitations of this trial included a relatively small sample size and treatment duration. However, given a close relationship to the parent molecule, pioglitazone, the potential for unforeseen safety issues is low and the present results can be viewed as confirmatory with respect to efficacy.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director, Medical Operations
- Organization
- POXEL
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2020
First Posted
March 25, 2020
Study Start
September 1, 2020
Primary Completion
June 8, 2022
Study Completion
June 20, 2022
Last Updated
August 29, 2023
Results First Posted
August 29, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08