A Study of Efruxifermin in Non-Cirrhotic Subjects With Histologically Confirmed Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)
Harmony
A Phase 2b, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Efruxifermin in Non-Cirrhotic Subjects With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)
1 other identifier
interventional
128
2 countries
55
Brief Summary
This is a multi-center evaluation of efruxifermin (EFX) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in non-cirrhotic subjects with biopsy-proven F2 - F3 NASH.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Feb 2021
Typical duration for phase_2
55 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 16, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 16, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 2, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 2, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 8, 2025
CompletedJune 18, 2025
June 1, 2025
3.2 years
February 16, 2021
February 12, 2025
June 2, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effect of Efruxifermin (EFX) vs Placebo on Fibrosis Regression in Participants With Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatohepatitis (MASH)-Associated Stage 2 or 3 Fibrosis (F2 or F3)
Proportions of subjects in EFX vs placebo groups with improvement in liver fibrosis, defined as ≥ 1 stage NASH Clinical Research Network \[CRN\] fibrosis score (score ranges from 0 to 4, increasing with fibrosis severity), and no worsening of steatohepatitis (no increase in NASH Activity Score \[NAS\], which ranges from 0 to 8 and is the sum of scores of steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocyte ballooning), at Week 24
24 Weeks
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve Improvement in Liver Fibrosis ≥ 1 Stage and no Worsening of Steatohepatitis at Week 96
96 Weeks
Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve Resolution of Steatohepatitis and no Worsening of Liver Fibrosis at Week 24 and Week 96
24 and 96 weeks
Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve Improvement in Liver Fibrosis ≥ 1 Stage at Week 24 and Week 96
24 and 96 Weeks
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Fraction in EFX vs Placebo Groups
24 and 96 Weeks
Change From Baseline in Lipoproteins at Week 24 and Week 96
24 and 96 weeks
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORdouble-blind, once-weekly subcutaneous injection
Efruxifermin 28 mg
EXPERIMENTALdouble-blind, once-weekly subcutaneous injection
Efruxifermin 50 mg
PLACEBO COMPARATORdouble-blind, once-weekly subcutaneous injection
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and non-pregnant, non-lactating females between 18 - 75 years of age inclusive, based on the date of the screening visit.
- Previous history or presence of 2 out of 4 components of metabolic syndrome (obesity, dyslipidemia, elevated blood pressure, elevated fasting glucose) or type 2 diabetes.
- FibroScan measurement \> 8.5 kPa \[kilopascal\].
- Biopsy-proven NASH. Must have had a liver biopsy obtained ≤ 180 days prior to randomization with fibrosis stage 2 to 3 and a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score (NAS) of ≥ 4 with at least a score of 1 in each of the following NAS components:
- Steatosis (scored 0 to 3),
- Ballooning degeneration (scored 0 to 2), and
- Lobular inflammation (scored 0 to 3).
You may not qualify if:
- Weight loss \> 5% in the 3 months prior to screening until randomization or from the time of the diagnostic liver biopsy until randomization, whichever is longer.
- Presence of cirrhosis on liver biopsy (stage 4 fibrosis).
- Type 1 or uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (55)
Akero Clinical Study Site
Chandler, Arizona, 85224, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Glendale, Arizona, 85304, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
North Little Rock, Arkansas, 72117, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Chula Vista, California, 91910, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Fresno, California, 93720, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
La Jolla, California, 92037, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Los Angeles, California, 90036, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Los Angeles, California, 90057, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Orange, California, 92866, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Panorama City, California, 91402, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Rialto, California, 92866, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Santa Ana, California, 92704, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Fort Myers, Florida, 33912, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Inverness, Florida, 34452, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Lakewood Rch, Florida, 34211, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Miami, Florida, 33134, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Miami, Florida, 33147, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33016, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Ocala, Florida, 34471, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Sarasota, Florida, 94240, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Marietta, Georgia, 30060, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Topeka, Kansas, 66606, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Marrero, Louisiana, 70072, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Flowood, Mississippi, 39232, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89106, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Durham, North Carolina, 27712, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Hermitage, Tennessee, 37076, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37211, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Arlington, Texas, 76012, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Austin, Texas, 78757, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Cedar Park, Texas, 75246, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Dallas, Texas, 75234, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Edinburg, Texas, 78539, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Garland, Texas, 75044, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Houston, Texas, 77058, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78209, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78215, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
San Marcos, Texas, 78666, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Webster, Texas, 77598, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23249, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
Akero Clinical Study Site
San Juan, 927, Puerto Rico
Related Publications (2)
Harrison SA, Frias JP, Neff G, Abrams GA, Lucas KJ, Sanchez W, Gogia S, Sheikh MY, Behling C, Bedossa P, Shao L, Chan D, Fong E, de Temple B, Shringarpure R, Tillman EJ, Rolph T, Cheng A, Yale K; HARMONY Study Group. Safety and efficacy of once-weekly efruxifermin versus placebo in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (HARMONY): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Dec;8(12):1080-1093. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00272-8. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
PMID: 37802088BACKGROUNDNoureddin M, Frias JP, Neff GW, Lucas KJ, Behling C, Bedossa P, Dubourg J, Chan D, Burch M, Fong E, de Temple B, Minerva M, Barrett K, Shringarpure R, Tillman EJ, Rolph T, Cheng A, Yale K. Safety and efficacy of once-weekly efruxifermin versus placebo in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (HARMONY): 96-week results from a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial. Lancet. 2025 Aug 16;406(10504):719-730. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01073-6.
PMID: 40818852DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Kitty Yale
- Organization
- Akero Therapeutics, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Akero Study Director
Study Director
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2021
First Posted
February 23, 2021
Study Start
February 16, 2021
Primary Completion
May 2, 2024
Study Completion
May 2, 2024
Last Updated
June 18, 2025
Results First Posted
May 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share