Volumetric Changes of Labial Soft Tissue Contour Following Different Approaches with Immediate Implant Placement
Hard and Soft Tissue Alterations on the Use of Dual Zone Concept Versus Connective Tissue Graft At Flapless Maxillary Immediate Implant Placement. a 1-year Randomized Clinical Trial and Volumetric Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Statement of the problem: Tooth extraction is followed by ridge alteration and soft tissue contour collapse. Different strategies were proposed to limit this collapse however, the ability of these techniques to mimic the original soft tissue contour and to maintain long term stability is unclear. Purpose : The aim of this study is to evaluate the volumetric difference of buccal soft tissue contour as well as the radiographic changes, following tooth extraction and immediate implant placement with dual zone concept versus connective tissue graft. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with single maxillary anterior or premolar tooth indicated for extraction will participate in this study, 15 patient in each group. Group 1 (test group) will be treated by immediate implant placement (IIP) with particulate bone grafts in the dual zone (the bone zone and the tissue zone) and customized healing abutment. Group 2 (control group) IIP with connective tissue graft (CTG) and customized healing abutment. Patient allocation is random for the 2 groups. Data will be collected pre-surgically and at follow up periods (3,6,9\&12 months and 6 months after delivery). Extra-oral scanning of the labial contour will be carried out to evaluate difference in contour gained and will be compared to the original contour and between treatment groups. Radiographic evaluation will be done using CBCT pre-operatively and at 12 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 9, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2023
CompletedNovember 21, 2024
November 1, 2024
2.6 years
March 9, 2020
November 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pink Esthetic Score (PES)
The PES is based on seven parameters; mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft-tissue level, soft tissue contour, alveolar process deficiency, soft-tissue color, and texture. The peri-implant mucosa will be evaluated by the seven index points. The grading using the PES suggested by Fürhauser will be performed. The contralateral tooth and the adjacent soft tissue served as reference using a 0-1-2 scoring system, with 0 being the lowest and 2 being the highest value (Fürhauser et al., 2005).
6 months after delivery (18 months after IIP)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Bucco-palatal width
Before surgery - 12 months
Gingival thickness
Before surgery - 6 months - 12 months
Mid facial recession to assess the changes in tissue level
Before surgery - 3 months - 6 months - 9 months - 12 months
Interdental papillae height to assess changes in papilla height
Before surgery - 3 months - 6 months - 9 months - 12 months
Modified Plaque Index
3 months - 6 months - 9 months - 12 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Dual zone concept and customized healing abutment
EXPERIMENTALImmediate implant placement with bone grafts in the dual zone and customized healing abutment.
Connective tissue graft and customized healing abutment
ACTIVE COMPARATORimmediate implant placement with CTG and customized healing abutment
Interventions
Immediate implant placement without flap raising using standard implant system protocol preparation will take place. Connective tissue grafts from the hard palate will be placed at the implant sites in a supraperiosteal partial dissection prepared at the buccal aspect. Sutures will be used to stabilize the graft, followed by customized healing abutment. Flowable composite will be injected at the gingival margin level to adapt to the sandblasted abutment, taking the shape of the socket at the marginal gingiva. Buccal groove will be made after the polymerization of this material for easier application. The abutments will be removed for final configurations of the apical part mimicking the emergence profile of the extracted tooth and finishing with laboratory discs and burs. The custom healing screw will be screwed to the implant.
Immediate implant placement without flap raising using standard implant system protocol preparation will take place. Followed by bone grafting following dual zone concept and customized healing abutment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who have at least one non-restorable maxillary anterior or premolar tooth with sound adjacent teeth.
- Adults at or above the age of 18.
- Intact thick biotype gingival tissue with at least 2mm band of keratinized tissue.
- Buccal bone thickness should be 1mm or less assessed in CBCT with good apical bone.
- Sagittal root position type 1 as described by Kan et al(30).
- Good oral hygiene
- Patient accepts to provide an informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Smokers
- Pregnant and lactating females.
- Medically compromised patients. , as Uncontrolled diabetic patients, patients taking bisphosphonates injection for treatment of osteoporosis, patients with active cardiac diseases, patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy, or any other medical and general contraindications for the surgical procedure (i.e. ASA score ≥III) (31)
- Patients with active infection related at the site of implant/bone graft placement.
- Patients with untreated active periodontal diseases.
- Patients with parafunctional habits
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
International Dental Contining Education Centre (IDCE)
Cairo, Egypt
Misr International University
Cairo, Egypt
Related Publications (24)
Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J. Partial Extraction Therapies (PET) Part 2: Procedures and Technical Aspects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017 May/Jun;37(3):377-385. doi: 10.11607/prd.3111.
PMID: 28402349BACKGROUNDFuentealba R, Jofre J. Esthetic failure in implant dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2015 Jan;59(1):227-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
PMID: 25434568BACKGROUNDEsposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants - a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009 Autumn;2(3):167-84.
PMID: 20467628BACKGROUNDChen ST, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla--a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:186-215. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.3.
PMID: 24660198BACKGROUNDBuser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:43-61.
PMID: 15635945BACKGROUNDGrunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005 Apr;25(2):113-9.
PMID: 15839587BACKGROUNDAraujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Feb;32(2):212-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x.
PMID: 15691354BACKGROUNDAraujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Dec;17(6):615-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01317.x.
PMID: 17092218BACKGROUNDChen ST, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:186-217.
PMID: 19885446BACKGROUNDHorvath A, Mardas N, Mezzomo LA, Needleman IG, Donos N. Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17(2):341-63. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0758-5. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
PMID: 22814758BACKGROUNDMasaki C, Nakamoto T, Mukaibo T, Kondo Y, Hosokawa R. Strategies for alveolar ridge reconstruction and preservation for implant therapy. J Prosthodont Res. 2015 Oct;59(4):220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 May 26.
PMID: 26022542BACKGROUNDDe Risi V, Clementini M, Vittorini G, Mannocci A, De Sanctis M. Alveolar ridge preservation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of histological and histomorphometrical data. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Jan;26(1):50-68. doi: 10.1111/clr.12288. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
PMID: 27007188BACKGROUNDLuckerath W, Roder L, Enkling N. The Effect of Primary Stabilization of the Graft in a Combined Surgical and Prosthodontic Ridge Preservation Protocol: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Pilot Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 May/Jun;38(3):e49-e58. doi: 10.11607/prd.3172.
PMID: 29641631BACKGROUNDKan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a surgical and prosthodontic rationale. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 2000 Nov-Dec;12(9):817-24; quiz 826.
PMID: 11405020BACKGROUNDKan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Deflorian M, Weinstein T, Wang HL, Testori T. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants. Periodontol 2000. 2018 Jun;77(1):197-212. doi: 10.1111/prd.12212. Epub 2018 Feb 25.
PMID: 29478284BACKGROUNDTarnow DP, Chu SJ, Salama MA, Stappert CF, Salama H, Garber DA, Sarnachiaro GO, Sarnachiaro E, Gotta SL, Saito H. Flapless postextraction socket implant placement in the esthetic zone: part 1. The effect of bone grafting and/or provisional restoration on facial-palatal ridge dimensional change-a retrospective cohort study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014 May-Jun;34(3):323-31. doi: 10.11607/prd.1821.
PMID: 24804283BACKGROUNDChu SJ, Salama MA, Garber DA, Salama H, Sarnachiaro GO, Sarnachiaro E, Gotta SL, Reynolds MA, Saito H, Tarnow DP. Flapless Postextraction Socket Implant Placement, Part 2: The Effects of Bone Grafting and Provisional Restoration on Peri-implant Soft Tissue Height and Thickness- A Retrospective Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015 Nov-Dec;35(6):803-9. doi: 10.11607/prd.2178.
PMID: 26509983BACKGROUNDChu SJ, Saito H, Salama MA, Garber DA, Salama H, Sarnachiaro GO, Reynolds MA, Tarnow DP. Flapless Postextraction Socket Implant Placement, Part 3: The Effects of Bone Grafting and Provisional Restoration on Soft Tissue Color Change-A Retrospective Pilot Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Jul/Aug;38(4):509-516. doi: 10.11607/prd.3571.
PMID: 29889914BACKGROUNDAkin R. A New Concept in Maintaining the Emergence Profile in Immediate Posterior Implant Placement: The Anatomic Harmony Abutment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Dec;74(12):2385-2392. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.184. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
PMID: 27475245BACKGROUNDJanakievski J. Case Report : Maintenance of Gingival Form Following Immediate Implant Placement - The Custom-Healing Abutment. Adv Esthet Interdiscip Dent. 2007;3(4):4-7
BACKGROUNDMihali S. Maintaining Tissue Architecture in Immediate Implant Placement Following Extraction of Natural Teeth Using Custom Healing Screw. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2018
BACKGROUNDZuiderveld EG, Meijer HJA, den Hartog L, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Effect of connective tissue grafting on peri-implant tissue in single immediate implant sites: A RCT. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Feb;45(2):253-264. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12820. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
PMID: 28941303BACKGROUNDKan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Morimoto T, Lozada J. Facial gingival tissue stability after connective tissue graft with single immediate tooth replacement in the esthetic zone: consecutive case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Nov;67(11 Suppl):40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.004.
PMID: 19835749BACKGROUNDKolerman R, Nissan J, Mijiritsky E, Hamoudi N, Mangano C, Tal H. Esthetic assessment of immediately restored implants combined with GBR and free connective tissue graft. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Nov;27(11):1414-1422. doi: 10.1111/clr.12755. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
PMID: 26743894BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ahmed I Abo El Futtouh, Master
Clinical Director of Implant Program - Misr International University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Khaled Abdel-Ghaffar, Professor
Minister of Higher Education and Scientific Research
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Inas S Hanna, Bsc
Dentist/Researcher - IDCE
- STUDY CHAIR
Nael A Mina, Bsc
Misr International University
- STUDY CHAIR
Abdel Rahman A Abdel Rahman, Master
International Dental Contiuing Education
- STUDY CHAIR
Ahmed F Mostafa, Bsc
International Dental Contiuing Education
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Director of Implant Program - Periodontology and Implantology Consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 9, 2020
First Posted
March 17, 2020
Study Start
July 1, 2020
Primary Completion
February 1, 2023
Study Completion
February 1, 2023
Last Updated
November 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- One year
- Access Criteria
- Principal investigator
All data can be shared