NCT04310449

Brief Summary

Statement of the problem: Tooth extraction is followed by ridge alteration and soft tissue contour collapse. Different strategies were proposed to limit this collapse however, the ability of these techniques to mimic the original soft tissue contour and to maintain long term stability is unclear. Purpose : The aim of this study is to evaluate the volumetric difference of buccal soft tissue contour as well as the radiographic changes, following tooth extraction and immediate implant placement with dual zone concept versus connective tissue graft. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with single maxillary anterior or premolar tooth indicated for extraction will participate in this study, 15 patient in each group. Group 1 (test group) will be treated by immediate implant placement (IIP) with particulate bone grafts in the dual zone (the bone zone and the tissue zone) and customized healing abutment. Group 2 (control group) IIP with connective tissue graft (CTG) and customized healing abutment. Patient allocation is random for the 2 groups. Data will be collected pre-surgically and at follow up periods (3,6,9\&12 months and 6 months after delivery). Extra-oral scanning of the labial contour will be carried out to evaluate difference in contour gained and will be compared to the original contour and between treatment groups. Radiographic evaluation will be done using CBCT pre-operatively and at 12 months.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 9, 2020

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 17, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2020

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

November 21, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

March 9, 2020

Last Update Submit

November 19, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Immediate implant placementConnective tissue graftdual-zone therapeutic conceptcustomized healing abutmentbuccal soft tissue contourvolumetric analysis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pink Esthetic Score (PES)

    The PES is based on seven parameters; mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft-tissue level, soft tissue contour, alveolar process deficiency, soft-tissue color, and texture. The peri-implant mucosa will be evaluated by the seven index points. The grading using the PES suggested by Fürhauser will be performed. The contralateral tooth and the adjacent soft tissue served as reference using a 0-1-2 scoring system, with 0 being the lowest and 2 being the highest value (Fürhauser et al., 2005).

    6 months after delivery (18 months after IIP)

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Bucco-palatal width

    Before surgery - 12 months

  • Gingival thickness

    Before surgery - 6 months - 12 months

  • Mid facial recession to assess the changes in tissue level

    Before surgery - 3 months - 6 months - 9 months - 12 months

  • Interdental papillae height to assess changes in papilla height

    Before surgery - 3 months - 6 months - 9 months - 12 months

  • Modified Plaque Index

    3 months - 6 months - 9 months - 12 months

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Dual zone concept and customized healing abutment

EXPERIMENTAL

Immediate implant placement with bone grafts in the dual zone and customized healing abutment.

Procedure: Dual zone concept and customized healing abutment

Connective tissue graft and customized healing abutment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

immediate implant placement with CTG and customized healing abutment

Procedure: Connective tissue graft and customized healing abutment

Interventions

Immediate implant placement without flap raising using standard implant system protocol preparation will take place. Connective tissue grafts from the hard palate will be placed at the implant sites in a supraperiosteal partial dissection prepared at the buccal aspect. Sutures will be used to stabilize the graft, followed by customized healing abutment. Flowable composite will be injected at the gingival margin level to adapt to the sandblasted abutment, taking the shape of the socket at the marginal gingiva. Buccal groove will be made after the polymerization of this material for easier application. The abutments will be removed for final configurations of the apical part mimicking the emergence profile of the extracted tooth and finishing with laboratory discs and burs. The custom healing screw will be screwed to the implant.

Also known as: zimmer biomed dental implants and connective tissue grafts and customized healing abutments
Connective tissue graft and customized healing abutment

Immediate implant placement without flap raising using standard implant system protocol preparation will take place. Followed by bone grafting following dual zone concept and customized healing abutment.

Also known as: zimmer biomed dental implants and dual zone bone grafting and customized healing abutments
Dual zone concept and customized healing abutment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who have at least one non-restorable maxillary anterior or premolar tooth with sound adjacent teeth.
  • Adults at or above the age of 18.
  • Intact thick biotype gingival tissue with at least 2mm band of keratinized tissue.
  • Buccal bone thickness should be 1mm or less assessed in CBCT with good apical bone.
  • Sagittal root position type 1 as described by Kan et al(30).
  • Good oral hygiene
  • Patient accepts to provide an informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Smokers
  • Pregnant and lactating females.
  • Medically compromised patients. , as Uncontrolled diabetic patients, patients taking bisphosphonates injection for treatment of osteoporosis, patients with active cardiac diseases, patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy, or any other medical and general contraindications for the surgical procedure (i.e. ASA score ≥III) (31)
  • Patients with active infection related at the site of implant/bone graft placement.
  • Patients with untreated active periodontal diseases.
  • Patients with parafunctional habits

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

International Dental Contining Education Centre (IDCE)

Cairo, Egypt

Location

Misr International University

Cairo, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (24)

  • Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J. Partial Extraction Therapies (PET) Part 2: Procedures and Technical Aspects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017 May/Jun;37(3):377-385. doi: 10.11607/prd.3111.

    PMID: 28402349BACKGROUND
  • Fuentealba R, Jofre J. Esthetic failure in implant dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2015 Jan;59(1):227-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

    PMID: 25434568BACKGROUND
  • Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants - a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009 Autumn;2(3):167-84.

    PMID: 20467628BACKGROUND
  • Chen ST, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla--a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:186-215. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.3.

    PMID: 24660198BACKGROUND
  • Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:43-61.

    PMID: 15635945BACKGROUND
  • Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005 Apr;25(2):113-9.

    PMID: 15839587BACKGROUND
  • Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Feb;32(2):212-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x.

    PMID: 15691354BACKGROUND
  • Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Dec;17(6):615-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01317.x.

    PMID: 17092218BACKGROUND
  • Chen ST, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:186-217.

    PMID: 19885446BACKGROUND
  • Horvath A, Mardas N, Mezzomo LA, Needleman IG, Donos N. Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Mar;17(2):341-63. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0758-5. Epub 2012 Jul 20.

    PMID: 22814758BACKGROUND
  • Masaki C, Nakamoto T, Mukaibo T, Kondo Y, Hosokawa R. Strategies for alveolar ridge reconstruction and preservation for implant therapy. J Prosthodont Res. 2015 Oct;59(4):220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 May 26.

    PMID: 26022542BACKGROUND
  • De Risi V, Clementini M, Vittorini G, Mannocci A, De Sanctis M. Alveolar ridge preservation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of histological and histomorphometrical data. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Jan;26(1):50-68. doi: 10.1111/clr.12288. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

    PMID: 27007188BACKGROUND
  • Luckerath W, Roder L, Enkling N. The Effect of Primary Stabilization of the Graft in a Combined Surgical and Prosthodontic Ridge Preservation Protocol: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Pilot Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 May/Jun;38(3):e49-e58. doi: 10.11607/prd.3172.

    PMID: 29641631BACKGROUND
  • Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a surgical and prosthodontic rationale. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 2000 Nov-Dec;12(9):817-24; quiz 826.

    PMID: 11405020BACKGROUND
  • Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Deflorian M, Weinstein T, Wang HL, Testori T. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants. Periodontol 2000. 2018 Jun;77(1):197-212. doi: 10.1111/prd.12212. Epub 2018 Feb 25.

    PMID: 29478284BACKGROUND
  • Tarnow DP, Chu SJ, Salama MA, Stappert CF, Salama H, Garber DA, Sarnachiaro GO, Sarnachiaro E, Gotta SL, Saito H. Flapless postextraction socket implant placement in the esthetic zone: part 1. The effect of bone grafting and/or provisional restoration on facial-palatal ridge dimensional change-a retrospective cohort study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014 May-Jun;34(3):323-31. doi: 10.11607/prd.1821.

    PMID: 24804283BACKGROUND
  • Chu SJ, Salama MA, Garber DA, Salama H, Sarnachiaro GO, Sarnachiaro E, Gotta SL, Reynolds MA, Saito H, Tarnow DP. Flapless Postextraction Socket Implant Placement, Part 2: The Effects of Bone Grafting and Provisional Restoration on Peri-implant Soft Tissue Height and Thickness- A Retrospective Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015 Nov-Dec;35(6):803-9. doi: 10.11607/prd.2178.

    PMID: 26509983BACKGROUND
  • Chu SJ, Saito H, Salama MA, Garber DA, Salama H, Sarnachiaro GO, Reynolds MA, Tarnow DP. Flapless Postextraction Socket Implant Placement, Part 3: The Effects of Bone Grafting and Provisional Restoration on Soft Tissue Color Change-A Retrospective Pilot Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Jul/Aug;38(4):509-516. doi: 10.11607/prd.3571.

    PMID: 29889914BACKGROUND
  • Akin R. A New Concept in Maintaining the Emergence Profile in Immediate Posterior Implant Placement: The Anatomic Harmony Abutment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Dec;74(12):2385-2392. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.184. Epub 2016 Jul 1.

    PMID: 27475245BACKGROUND
  • Janakievski J. Case Report : Maintenance of Gingival Form Following Immediate Implant Placement - The Custom-Healing Abutment. Adv Esthet Interdiscip Dent. 2007;3(4):4-7

    BACKGROUND
  • Mihali S. Maintaining Tissue Architecture in Immediate Implant Placement Following Extraction of Natural Teeth Using Custom Healing Screw. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2018

    BACKGROUND
  • Zuiderveld EG, Meijer HJA, den Hartog L, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Effect of connective tissue grafting on peri-implant tissue in single immediate implant sites: A RCT. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Feb;45(2):253-264. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12820. Epub 2017 Dec 5.

    PMID: 28941303BACKGROUND
  • Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Morimoto T, Lozada J. Facial gingival tissue stability after connective tissue graft with single immediate tooth replacement in the esthetic zone: consecutive case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Nov;67(11 Suppl):40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.004.

    PMID: 19835749BACKGROUND
  • Kolerman R, Nissan J, Mijiritsky E, Hamoudi N, Mangano C, Tal H. Esthetic assessment of immediately restored implants combined with GBR and free connective tissue graft. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Nov;27(11):1414-1422. doi: 10.1111/clr.12755. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

    PMID: 26743894BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Ahmed I Abo El Futtouh, Master

    Clinical Director of Implant Program - Misr International University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Khaled Abdel-Ghaffar, Professor

    Minister of Higher Education and Scientific Research

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Inas S Hanna, Bsc

    Dentist/Researcher - IDCE

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Nael A Mina, Bsc

    Misr International University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Abdel Rahman A Abdel Rahman, Master

    International Dental Contiuing Education

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Ahmed F Mostafa, Bsc

    International Dental Contiuing Education

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: • To compare the volumetric changes in the buccal soft tissue contour between immediate implants with CTG and customized healing abutments, and immediate implants with bone grafting in the dual zone and customized healing abutmnets
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Director of Implant Program - Periodontology and Implantology Consultant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2020

First Posted

March 17, 2020

Study Start

July 1, 2020

Primary Completion

February 1, 2023

Study Completion

February 1, 2023

Last Updated

November 21, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All data can be shared

Shared Documents
SAP, CSR
Time Frame
One year
Access Criteria
Principal investigator

Locations