NCT04309006

Brief Summary

Statement of the problem: Using customized contoured healing abutments at the time of immediate implant placement is a treatment modality to improve esthetics by maintain the soft tissue contour. Using connective tissue grafts enhances and maintains soft tissue stability. However, the effect of the combined procedures for maintenance of the soft tissue morphology remains unclear. Purpose : The aim of the study is to evaluate the volumetric difference of buccal soft tissue contour around immediate implants placed with and without connective tissue grafts and customized healing abutments. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two patients with single maxillary anterior or premolar tooth indicated for extraction will participate in this study, 13 patients will randomly be assigned in each group. Group 1 (test group) will be treated by immediate implant placement (IIP) with connective tissue graft (CTG) and customized healing abutment, Group 2 (test group) IIP with CTG and healing abutment same diameter of the implant, Group 3 (test group) IIP and customized healing abutment, while the 4th group (control) IIP with healing abutment same diameter of the implant. Extra-oral scanning of the buccal contour will be carried out presurgical and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery. Difference in contour gained will be compared to the original contour and between groups. Radiographic evaluation will be done using CBCT at 12 months to measure the bone width. In addition, soft tissue thickness, mid facial recession, gingival biotype, interdental papilla height, soft tissue peri- implant parameters and any surgical or prosthetic complications will be assessed.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
52

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 9, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 16, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2020

Completed
4.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 17, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

4.1 years

First QC Date

March 9, 2020

Last Update Submit

October 15, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Immediate implant placementConnective tissue graftbuccal soft tissue contourcustomized healing abutmentvolumetric analysiscone beam computerized tomography (CBCT)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Volumetric analysis of buccal contour

    Measuring changes in the buccal soft tissue contour in comparison to the original ones, at 2,4 and 6 mm from the pre-operative gingival margin. This will be done using Extra oral scanning and 3D viewer software

    Before surgery - 3 months - 6 months - 9 months - 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Bucco-palatal width

    Before surgery - 12 months

  • Gingival thickness

    Before surgery - 6 months - 12 months

  • Mid facial recession

    Before surgery - 3 months - 6 months - 9 months - 12 months

  • Interdental papillae height

    Before surgery - 3 months - 6 months - 9 months - 12 months

  • Modified Plaque Index

    3 months - 6 months - 9 months - 12 months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

CTG and customized healing abutment

EXPERIMENTAL

Customized healing abutment used with connective tissue graft

Procedure: CTG and customized healing abutment

CTG and conventional healing abutment

EXPERIMENTAL

Conventional healing abutment (same diameter of the implant) used with connective tissue graft

Procedure: CTG and conventional healing abutment

customized healing abutment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Customized healing abutment used without connective tissue graft

Procedure: CTG and customized healing abutment

conventional healing abutment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Conventional healing abutment (same diameter of the implant) without connective tissue graft

Procedure: CTG and conventional healing abutment

Interventions

screw- retained customized healing abutment

Also known as: zimmer biomed dental implants and connective tissue grafts and customized healing abutments
CTG and customized healing abutmentcustomized healing abutment

conventional healing abutment

Also known as: Zimmer biomed dental implants and connective tissue graft
CTG and conventional healing abutmentconventional healing abutment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults at or above the age of 18.
  • Patients who have at least one non-restorable maxillary anterior or premolar tooth with sound adjacent teeth.
  • Intact thick biotype gingival tissue with at least 2mm band of keratinized tissue.
  • Buccal bone thickness should be 1mm or less assessed in CBCT with good apical bone.
  • Sagittal root position type 1 as described by Kan et al(24).
  • Good oral hygiene
  • Patient accepts to provide an informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Smokers
  • Pregnant and lactating females.
  • Medically compromised patients, as Uncontrolled diabetic patients, patients taking bisphosphonates injection for treatment of osteoporosis, patients with active cardiac diseases, patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy, or any other medical and general contraindications for the surgical procedure (i.e. ASA score ≥III) (25)
  • Patients with active infection related at the site of implant/bone graft placement.
  • Patients with untreated active periodontal diseases.
  • Patients with parafunctional habits.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

International Dental Contining Education Centre (IDCE)

Cairo, Egypt

Location

Misr International University

Cairo, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (39)

  • Buser D, Halbritter S, Hart C, Bornstein MM, Grutter L, Chappuis V, Belser UC. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):152-62. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080360.

    PMID: 19228101BACKGROUND
  • Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Site development for anterior single implant esthetics: the dentulous site. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2001 Mar;22(3):221-6, 228, 230-1; quiz 232.

    PMID: 11913259BACKGROUND
  • Fuentealba R, Jofre J. Esthetic failure in implant dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2015 Jan;59(1):227-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Sep 26.

    PMID: 25434568BACKGROUND
  • Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 May;81(5):537-52. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70208-8.

    PMID: 10220658BACKGROUND
  • Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada JL, Zimmerman G. Facial gingival tissue stability following immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a 2- to 8-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jan-Feb;26(1):179-87.

    PMID: 21365054BACKGROUND
  • Chen ST, Beagle J, Jensen SS, Chiapasco M, Darby I. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding surgical techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:272-8. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19885450BACKGROUND
  • De Bruyckere T, Eghbali A, Younes F, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. Horizontal stability of connective tissue grafts at the buccal aspect of single implants: a 1-year prospective case series. J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Sep;42(9):876-882. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12448. Epub 2015 Sep 16.

    PMID: 26373422BACKGROUND
  • Hammerle CH, Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:26-8. No abstract available.

    PMID: 15635943BACKGROUND
  • Levine RA, Ganeles J, Kan J, Fava PL. 10 Keys for Successful Esthetic-Zone Single Implants: Importance of Biotype Conversion for Lasting Success. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2018 Sep;39(8):522-529; quiz 530.

    PMID: 30188147BACKGROUND
  • Lee CT, Tao CY, Stoupel J. The Effect of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Placement on Esthetic Outcomes After Immediate Implant Placement: Systematic Review. J Periodontol. 2016 Feb;87(2):156-67. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.150383. Epub 2015 Oct 15.

    PMID: 26469808BACKGROUND
  • Kolerman R, Nissan J, Mijiritsky E, Hamoudi N, Mangano C, Tal H. Esthetic assessment of immediately restored implants combined with GBR and free connective tissue graft. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Nov;27(11):1414-1422. doi: 10.1111/clr.12755. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

    PMID: 26743894BACKGROUND
  • Cosyn J, Eghbali A, Hermans A, Vervaeke S, De Bruyn H, Cleymaet R. A 5-year prospective study on single immediate implants in the aesthetic zone. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Aug;43(8):702-9. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12571. Epub 2016 Jun 13.

    PMID: 27120578BACKGROUND
  • Touati B, Guez G, Saadoun A. Aesthetic soft tissue integration and optimized emergence profile: provisionalization and customized impression coping. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1999 Apr;11(3):305-14; quiz 316.

    PMID: 10379291BACKGROUND
  • Saito H, Chu SJ, Reynolds MA, Tarnow DP. Provisional Restorations Used in Immediate Implant Placement Provide a Platform to Promote Peri-implant Soft Tissue Healing: A Pilot Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016 Jan-Feb;36(1):47-52. doi: 10.11607/prd.1945.

    PMID: 26697547BACKGROUND
  • del Castillo RA. Immediate provisionalization of a single-tooth implant with a temporary cylinder in one surgical appointment. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2006 Jun;18(5):suppl 3-5. No abstract available.

    PMID: 16903535BACKGROUND
  • Lemongello GJ Jr. Immediate custom implant provisionalization: a prosthetic technique. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2007 Jun;19(5):273-9.

    PMID: 17679316BACKGROUND
  • Mihali S. Maintaining Tissue Architecture in Immediate Implant Placement Following Extraction of Natural Teeth Using Custom Healing Screw. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2018

    BACKGROUND
  • Akin R. A New Concept in Maintaining the Emergence Profile in Immediate Posterior Implant Placement: The Anatomic Harmony Abutment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Dec;74(12):2385-2392. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.184. Epub 2016 Jul 1.

    PMID: 27475245BACKGROUND
  • Janakievski J. Case Report : Maintenance of Gingival Form Following Immediate Implant Placement - The Custom-Healing Abutment. Adv Esthet Interdiscip Dent. 2007;3(4):4-7

    BACKGROUND
  • Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Deflorian M, Weinstein T, Wang HL, Testori T. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants. Periodontol 2000. 2018 Jun;77(1):197-212. doi: 10.1111/prd.12212. Epub 2018 Feb 25.

    PMID: 29478284BACKGROUND
  • van Nimwegen WG, Raghoebar GM, Zuiderveld EG, Jung RE, Meijer HJA, Muhlemann S. Immediate placement and provisionalization of implants in the aesthetic zone with or without a connective tissue graft: A 1-year randomized controlled trial and volumetric study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jul;29(7):671-678. doi: 10.1111/clr.13258. Epub 2018 May 27.

    PMID: 29806181BACKGROUND
  • Luckerath W, Roder L, Enkling N. The Effect of Primary Stabilization of the Graft in a Combined Surgical and Prosthodontic Ridge Preservation Protocol: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Pilot Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 May/Jun;38(3):e49-e58. doi: 10.11607/prd.3172.

    PMID: 29641631BACKGROUND
  • Kan JY, Roe P, Rungcharassaeng K, Patel RD, Waki T, Lozada JL, Zimmerman G. Classification of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary osseous housing for immediate implant placement: a cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):873-6.

    PMID: 21841998BACKGROUND
  • Smeets EC, de Jong KJ, Abraham-Inpijn L. Detecting the medically compromised patient in dentistry by means of the medical risk-related history. A survey of 29,424 dental patients in The Netherlands. Prev Med. 1998 Jul-Aug;27(4):530-5. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0285.

    PMID: 9672946BACKGROUND
  • Chrcanovic BR, Kisch J, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Factors Influencing Early Dental Implant Failures. J Dent Res. 2016 Aug;95(9):995-1002. doi: 10.1177/0022034516646098. Epub 2016 May 4.

    PMID: 27146701BACKGROUND
  • Olmedo-Gaya MV, Manzano-Moreno FJ, Canaveral-Cavero E, de Dios Luna-del Castillo J, Vallecillo-Capilla M. Risk factors associated with early implant failure: A 5-year retrospective clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Feb;115(2):150-5. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.020. Epub 2015 Nov 3.

    PMID: 26545864BACKGROUND
  • Vissink A, Spijkervet F, Raghoebar GM. The medically compromised patient: Are dental implants a feasible option? Oral Dis. 2018 Mar;24(1-2):253-260. doi: 10.1111/odi.12762.

    PMID: 29480621BACKGROUND
  • Lobbezoo F, Brouwers JE, Cune MS, Naeije M. Dental implants in patients with bruxing habits. J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Feb;33(2):152-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01542.x.

    PMID: 16457676BACKGROUND
  • Kan JY, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Smith DH. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 Jun;30(3):237-43.

    PMID: 20386780BACKGROUND
  • Testori T, Meltzer A, Del Fabbro M, Zuffetti F, Troiano M, Francetti L, Weinstein RL. Immediate occlusal loading of Osseotite implants in the lower edentulous jaw. A multicenter prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Jun;15(3):278-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01013.x.

    PMID: 15142089BACKGROUND
  • Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Feb;32(2):212-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x.

    PMID: 15691354BACKGROUND
  • Zuhr O, Baumer D, Hurzeler M. The addition of soft tissue replacement grafts in plastic periodontal and implant surgery: critical elements in design and execution. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S123-42. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12185.

    PMID: 24640997BACKGROUND
  • Ueno D, Kobayashi M, Tanaka K, Watanabe T, Nakamura T, Ueda K, Nagano T. Measurement accuracy of alveolar soft tissue contour using a laboratory laser scanner. Odontology. 2018 Apr;106(2):202-207. doi: 10.1007/s10266-017-0315-4. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

    PMID: 28770415BACKGROUND
  • Kim SH, Choi JH, Chung KR, Nelson G. Do sand blasted with large grit and acid etched surface treated mini-implants remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Angle Orthod. 2012 Mar;82(2):304-12. doi: 10.2319/032511-212.1. Epub 2011 Aug 10.

    PMID: 21830933BACKGROUND
  • Koerich L, Weissheimer A, Koerich LE, Luz D, Deeb JG. A Technique of Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography Superimposition in Implant Dentistry. J Oral Implantol. 2018 Oct;44(5):365-369. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00282. Epub 2018 May 2. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29717909BACKGROUND
  • Amid R, Mirakhori M, Safi Y, Kadkhodazadeh M, Namdari M. Assessment of gingival biotype and facial hard/soft tissue dimensions in the maxillary anterior teeth region using cone beam computed tomography. Arch Oral Biol. 2017 Jul;79:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

    PMID: 28279824BACKGROUND
  • Cevidanes LH, Styner MA, Proffit WR. Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 May;129(5):611-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.008.

    PMID: 16679201BACKGROUND
  • Borges GJ, Ruiz LF, de Alencar AH, Porto OC, Estrela C. Cone-beam computed tomography as a diagnostic method for determination of gingival thickness and distance between gingival margin and bone crest. ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:142108. doi: 10.1155/2015/142108. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

    PMID: 25918737BACKGROUND
  • Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E Jr, Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1987 Dec;2(4):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.1987.tb00298.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 3507627BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Ahmed I Abo El Futtouh, Master

    Clinical Director of Implant Program - Misr International University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Khaled Abdel-Ghaffar, Doctor

    Minister of Higher Education and Scientific Research

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Inas M El-Zayat, Doctor

    Assoc.Prof - Operative department, Faculty of Dentistry

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Mariam S Hanna, Bsc

    Dentist/Researcher - IDCE

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Nael A Mina, Bsc

    Misr International University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Abdel Rahman A Abdel Rahman, Master

    International Dental Contiuing Education

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Ahmed F Mostafa, Bsc

    International Dental Contiuing Education

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: The first factor is the use of connective tissue graft which includes two levels and the second factor is the use of healing abutment which includes two levels.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Director of Implant Program - Periodontology and Implantology Consultant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2020

First Posted

March 16, 2020

Study Start

July 1, 2020

Primary Completion

August 1, 2024

Study Completion

August 1, 2024

Last Updated

October 17, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All data can be shared

Shared Documents
SAP, CSR
Time Frame
One year
Access Criteria
Principal investigator

Locations