NCT02992366

Brief Summary

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of socket shield technique compared with conventional immediate implant placement.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2016

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2016

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 10, 2016

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 14, 2016

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

December 14, 2016

Status Verified

December 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

December 10, 2016

Last Update Submit

December 10, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

socket shieldvolumetric tissue alterationimmediate implant

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Vertical and horizontal bone level

    9 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Pocket probing depth

    9 months

  • Labial Alveolar crestal bone height compared with the lingual side

    9 months

Study Arms (2)

socket shield (A)

EXPERIMENTAL

1. Following local anesthetic infiltration opposite to the root to be extracted the root is sectioned in a mesiodistal direction along its long axis as far apical as possible. 2. After sectioning the root into labial and palatal halves, the palatal half is removed with preservation of the labial root section. 3. The labial half is prepared to be Flushing or 1mm above the labial alveolar crest. Then thinned slightly to a concave contour in an apico-coronal and mesiodistal direction. 4. The implant will be inserted in place of the palatal half with the labial surface of the implant facing the labial root shield (root-implant interface) primary closure will not be attempted as the patients will undergo immediate non-functioning provisionization.

Procedure: implant placement

conventional immediate implant (B)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

1. Following local anesthetic infiltration opposite to the root to be extracted non traumatic extraction of the tooth or remaining root by periotome. 2. The implant fixture will be inserted in the empty socket by conventional manner. primary closure will not be attempted as the patients will undergo immediate non-functioning provisionization.

Procedure: implant placement

Interventions

implant placement

conventional immediate implant (B)socket shield (A)

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with remaining roots in the esthetic zone with intact periodontal condition indicated for extraction.
  • Physically able to tolerate conventional surgical and restorative procedures
  • Signing of an informed consent form
  • Implant insertion torque \> 32 N cm with good primary stability

You may not qualify if:

  • Systemic diseases contraindicating implant placement eg uncontrolled diabetes
  • Severe bruxism
  • Active infection in the teeth to be treated
  • Vertical root fractures with displacement in the teeth of the surgical area

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (26)

  • Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Sep;30(9):809-18. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00366.x.

    PMID: 12956657BACKGROUND
  • Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Jun;32(6):645-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.x.

    PMID: 15882225BACKGROUND
  • Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003 Aug;23(4):313-23.

    PMID: 12956475BACKGROUND
  • Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:43-61.

    PMID: 15635945BACKGROUND
  • Botticelli D, Persson LG, Lindhe J, Berglundh T. Bone tissue formation adjacent to implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Aug;17(4):351-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01270.x.

    PMID: 16907764BACKGROUND
  • Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Bolz W, Huerzeler MB. Hard tissue alterations after socket preservation: an experimental study in the beagle dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Nov;19(11):1111-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01575.x.

    PMID: 18983313BACKGROUND
  • AMLER MH, JOHNSON PL, SALMAN I. Histological and histochemical investigation of human alveolar socket healing in undisturbed extraction wounds. J Am Dent Assoc. 1960 Jul;61:32-44. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1960.0152. No abstract available.

    PMID: 13793201BACKGROUND
  • Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Stappert CF, Stein JM, Hurzeler MB. Dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge contour after different socket preservation techniques. J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Oct;35(10):906-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01305.x. Epub 2008 Aug 17.

    PMID: 18713258BACKGROUND
  • Pietrokovski J, Massler M. Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent. 1967 Jan;17(1):21-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(67)90046-7. No abstract available.

    PMID: 5224784BACKGROUND
  • Lang NP, Pun L, Lau KY, Li KY, Wong MC. A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 Suppl 5:39-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02372.x.

    PMID: 22211305BACKGROUND
  • Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Oct;31(10):820-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.x.

    PMID: 15367183BACKGROUND
  • Hammerle CH, Araujo MG, Simion M; Osteology Consensus Group 2011. Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 Suppl 5:80-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.x.

    PMID: 22211307BACKGROUND
  • Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr, Hammerle CH. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:12-25.

    PMID: 15635942BACKGROUND
  • Fickl S, Schneider D, Zuhr O, Hinze M, Ender A, Jung RE, Hurzeler MB. Dimensional changes of the ridge contour after socket preservation and buccal overbuilding: an animal study. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 May;36(5):442-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01381.x.

    PMID: 19419446BACKGROUND
  • Vermylen K, Collaert B, Linden U, Bjorn AL, De Bruyn H. Patient satisfaction and quality of single-tooth restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003 Feb;14(1):119-24. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140116.x.

    PMID: 12562374BACKGROUND
  • Baumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, Schneider D, Schupbach P, Hurzeler M. The socket-shield technique: first histological, clinical, and volumetrical observations after separation of the buccal tooth segment - a pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Feb;17(1):71-82. doi: 10.1111/cid.12076. Epub 2013 Apr 30.

    PMID: 23631704BACKGROUND
  • Cherel F, Etienne D. Papilla preservation between two implants: a modified socket-shield technique to maintain the scalloped anatomy? A case report. Quintessence Int. 2014 Jan;45(1):23-30. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a30765.

    PMID: 24392492BACKGROUND
  • Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Proximal socket shield for interimplant papilla preservation in the esthetic zone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 Jan-Feb;33(1):e24-31. doi: 10.11607/prd.1346.

    PMID: 23342355BACKGROUND
  • Scheuber S, Bosshardt D, Bragger U, von Arx T. [Implant therapy following trauma of the anterior teeth - a new method for alveolar ridge preservation after post-traumatic ankylosis and external root resorption]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 2013;123(5):417-39. French, German.

    PMID: 23720038BACKGROUND
  • Parlar A, Bosshardt DD, Unsal B, Cetiner D, Haytac C, Lang NP. New formation of periodontal tissues around titanium implants in a novel dentin chamber model. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Jun;16(3):259-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01123.x.

    PMID: 15877745BACKGROUND
  • Davarpanah M, Szmukler-Moncler S. Unconventional implant treatment: I. Implant placement in contact with ankylosed root fragments. A series of five case reports. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Aug;20(8):851-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01653.x.

    PMID: 19604282BACKGROUND
  • Donos N, Mardas N, Chadha V. Clinical outcomes of implants following lateral bone augmentation: systematic assessment of available options (barrier membranes, bone grafts, split osteotomy). J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):173-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01269.x.

    PMID: 18724850BACKGROUND
  • Salama M, Ishikawa T, Salama H, Funato A, Garber D. Advantages of the root submergence technique for pontic site development in esthetic implant therapy. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007 Dec;27(6):521-7.

    PMID: 18092446BACKGROUND
  • Bowers GM, Chadroff B, Carnevale R, Mellonig J, Corio R, Emerson J, Stevens M, Romberg E. Histologic evaluation of new attachment apparatus formation in humans. Part III. J Periodontol. 1989 Dec;60(12):683-93. doi: 10.1902/jop.1989.60.12.683.

    PMID: 2614633BACKGROUND
  • Hurzeler MB, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, Rebele SF, Emmanouilidis N, Fickl S. The socket-shield technique: a proof-of-principle report. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Sep;37(9):855-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01595.x.

    PMID: 20712701BACKGROUND
  • Chen ST, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla--a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:186-215. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.3.

    PMID: 24660198BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Mohamed Galal G. Beheiri, professor

    senior supervisor

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Mostafa I. Shindy, lecturer

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Oral and Maxillofacial surgery resident in ministry of health

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2016

First Posted

December 14, 2016

Study Start

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion

July 1, 2017

Study Completion

December 1, 2017

Last Updated

December 14, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-12