Lidocaine Versus Esmolol for Optimizing Surgical Field Visibility
Intraoperative Lidocaine Versus Esmolol Infusion for Optimizing Surgical Field Visibility During Lumbar Discectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Intra-operative blood loss is an important attribution and predictor of the lumbar spine surgery and patient outcome. Stripping the muscle off bone makes more exposed bleeding spine surface is one of causes for blood loss during lumbar surgeries. The importance to decrease the bleeding is to improve the surgical field visibility which provides technical ease for surgeon and decreases the surgical time besides maintaining the hemodynamic stability. In past, there were many trials to minimize surgical blood loss by different drugs such as Na Nitroprusside, magnesium sulfate, volatile anesthetics and beta-adrenergic antagonist.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Feb 2020
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 21, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 4, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 15, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2020
CompletedJuly 2, 2020
June 1, 2020
4 months
January 21, 2020
June 30, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The quality of surgical field visibility
using the surgical field rating (SFR) scale of six points proposed by (Fromme et al 1986) : Grade 0: No bleeding - virtually bloodless field. Grade 1: Slight bleeding so no suctioning required. Grade 2: Slight bleeding so occasional suctioning required. Grade 3: Low bleeding- frequent suctioning required; bleeding threatens surgical field some seconds after suction is removed. Grade 4: Moderate bleeding- frequent suctioning required, bleeding threatens surgical field directly after suctioning. Grade 5: Sever bleeding so constant suctioning required; bleeding appears faster than can be removed by suction; surgical field severely threatened and surgery hardly possible.
from the start of surgery till the end of surgery
Mean arterial blood pressure
automatically invasive measured every 3 minutes , recorded every 15 minutes till the end
from induction of anesthesia till the end of surgery
Secondary Outcomes (5)
heart rate
15 minutes after the start of hypotensive agent
simplified postoperative nausea and vomiting
for the first 24 hours postoperative
surgeon satisfaction
"at completion of operation, an average 2 hours "
The need for blood transfusion
"through study completion, an average of four months".
the amount of blood loss
from the beginning of surgery till the end of surgery, an average two hours"
Study Arms (2)
lidocaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe Patient will receive IV bolus of 1.5mg/kg lidocaine 1% over ten minutes followed by continuous infusion of 1.5mg/kg/h
esmolol
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe Patient will receive IV bolus of esmolol 0.5 mg/kg over ten minutes followed by continuous infusion of 100-300 ug/kg/min
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American society of anesthesiologist( ASA): I\& II Physical status:
- Body Mass Index( BMI)=(25-35 kg/m2).
- Type of operations: lumbar discectomy.
- Written informed consent from the patient.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal.
- Altered mental state
- Patients on beta-blockers or with a known history of allergy to study drugs.
- Hepatic, renal, Cardiovascular and respiratory diseases.
- Diabetic patients.
- Patients receiving anticoagulants.
- Previous spine surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Medicine
Zagazig, Elsharkia, 022/055, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Olfat Ibrahem Amin, M.D
Zagazig University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- the outcome assessor the surgeon
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principle investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 21, 2020
First Posted
February 7, 2020
Study Start
February 4, 2020
Primary Completion
June 15, 2020
Study Completion
June 30, 2020
Last Updated
July 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share