Erector Spinae Plane Block and Modified-Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block Following Lumbar Spinal Surgery
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Modified-Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block And Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management Following Lumbar Spinal Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral nerve blocks have been used increasily due to the advantages of ultrasound in anesthesia practice. TLIP block is one of these nerve blocks performed under US guidance. In this technique, local anesthetic solution is injected between the multifidus and logissimus muscles nearly at the level of the 3rd lumbar vertebra and targets the dorsal rami of the thoracolumbar nerves. However, the visualisation of this technique may be difficult under US guidance. Therefore, modified-TLIP (mTLIP) block was defined as a new approach. It has been reported that mTLIP block may provide effective analgesia management after lumbar spine surgery. The ultrasound (US) guided erector spina plane block (ESPB) is a novel interfacial plan block defined by Forero et al. at 2016. Visualization of sonoanatomy with US is easy, and the spread of local anesthesic agents can be easily seen under the erector spinae muscle. Thus, analgesia occurs in several dermatomes with cephalad-caudad way. It has been reported that ESPB provides lumbar analgesia at T10-12, L3. The aim of this study is to compare US-guided mTLIP block and ESPB pain management after lumbar discectomy+ surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 27, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 13, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 16, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 16, 2020
CompletedSeptember 17, 2020
September 1, 2020
1 year
August 27, 2019
September 16, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Opioid consumption
The primary aim is to compare perioperative and postoperative opioid consumption
The opioid consumption at perioperative period and postoperatively 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pain scores (Visual analogue scores-VAS)
Changes from baseline pain scores at postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours.
Study Arms (3)
Group T = mTLIP block group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn group T, mTLIP block will be performed. US probe will be placed vertically at the L3 vertebrae level. After visualizing the hyperechoic shadow of the spinous process and interspinous muscles as an anatomical guide point, the probe will be moved forward to the lateral to visualize the longissimus and iliocostal muscles. Between these muscles, block needle will be inserted within in plane technique in a medial-to-lateral direction in the interfascial plane. Once the needle tip will be placed within the interfacial plane and after careful aspiration to rule out intravascular needle placement, 2 mL of saline will be injected to confirm the proper injection site, and then a dose of 0.25% bupivacaine 20 mL will be injected in each side (total 40 mL).
Group E = ESPB group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn group E, ESP block will be performed. US probe will be placed longitudinally 2-3 cm lateral to the L3 transverse process. Erector spinae muscle will be visualized on the hyperechoic transverse process. The block needle will be inserted cranio caudal direction and then for correction of the needle 2 ml saline will be enjected deep into the erector spina muscle fascia. Following confirmation of the correct position of the needle 20 ml %0.25 bupivacaine will be administered for block in each side (total 40 mL).
Group C = Control group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients in control group will be administered ibuprofen 400 mgr IV every 8 hours in the postoperative period.A patient controlled device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 10 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 10 min lockout time and 4 hour limit.
Interventions
Patients will be administered ibuprofen 400 mgr IV every 8 hours in the postoperative period.A patient controlled device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 10 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 10 min lockout time and 4 hour limit. Postoperative patient evaluation will be performed by an anesthesiologist blinded to the procedure. Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the VAS score (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt). The VAS scores at rest and during cough will be recorded at postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours. If the VAS score will be ≥ 4, 0.5 mg/ kg meperidine IV will be administered. The first time of the use of rescue analgesic, intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, side effects such as nausea, vomiting, itching and block related complications will be recorded.
Patients will be administered ibuprofen 400 mgr IV every 8 hours in the postoperative period.A patient controlled device prepared with 10 mcg/ ml fentanyl will be attached to all patients with a protocol included 10 mcg bolus without infusion dose, 10 min lockout time and 4 hour limit. Postoperative patient evaluation will be performed by an anesthesiologist blinded to the procedure. Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the VAS score (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt). The VAS scores at rest and during cough will be recorded at postoperative 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours. If the VAS score will be ≥ 4, 0.5 mg/ kg meperidine IV will be administered. The first time of the use of rescue analgesic, intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, side effects such as nausea, vomiting, itching and block related complications will be recorded.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
- Scheduled for lumbar disc herniation-laminectomy surgery under general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- history of bleeding diathesis,
- receiving anticoagulant treatment,
- known local anesthetics and opioid allergy,
- infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture,
- pregnancy or lactation,
- patients who do not accept the procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
Istanbul, Bagcilar, 34070, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (4)
Ahiskalioglu A, Alici HA, Selvitopi K, Yayik AM. Ultrasonography-guided modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block: a new approach. Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jul;64(7):775-776. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0851-y. Epub 2017 Feb 27. No abstract available.
PMID: 28243853BACKGROUNDYayik AM, Cesur S, Ozturk F, Ahiskalioglu A, Ay AN, Celik EC, Karaavci NC. Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of the Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Decompression Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e779-e785. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.149. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
PMID: 30853517BACKGROUNDSingh S, Choudhary NK, Lalin D, Verma VK. Bilateral Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Control Trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2020 Oct;32(4):330-334. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000603.
PMID: 31033625BACKGROUNDAhiskalioglu A, Yayik AM, Doymus O, Selvitopi K, Ahiskalioglu EO, Calikoglu C, Alici HA, Karaca O. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block for postoperative analgesia after spinal surgery: a randomized-controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2018 May;65(5):603-604. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1051-0. Epub 2018 Jan 9. No abstract available.
PMID: 29318534BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The patient and the anesthesiologist who performs postoperative pain evaluation will not know the group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Primary researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2019
First Posted
August 29, 2019
Study Start
September 13, 2019
Primary Completion
September 16, 2020
Study Completion
September 16, 2020
Last Updated
September 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
We will not plan to share IPD