The Effect of a Lumbar Rotational Spinal Mobilization Technique With Lumbar Disc Herniation
Acute Effect Of The Lumbar Rotational Spinal Mobilization Technique On Pain, Disability And Radiological Findings Of Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to research the effect of the Lumbar Spinal Rotational Mobilization technique on radiological findings, pain, disability and joint range of motion (ROM) in patients with lumbar disc herniation
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 2, 2022
CompletedAugust 2, 2022
July 1, 2022
4 months
July 19, 2022
July 30, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Assessing disc height change
Images for radiological assessment of patients were obtained with a 1.5 Tesla GE brand Magnetic Resonance (MR) device. Sagittal T2A and axial T2A sequences were used. If the same person had herniation at different levels, the level with highest degree of herniation was included in the assessment. All MR images were obtained during the day between 16:00 and 18:00 hours
Disc height, was measured twice by a radiology expert 1 week before and 1 week after treatment
Assessing disc herniation thickness change
Images for radiological assessment of patients were obtained with a 1.5 Tesla GE brand Magnetic Resonance (MR) device. Sagittal T2A and axial T2A sequences were used. If the same person had herniation at different levels, the level with highest degree of herniation was included in the assessment. All MR images were obtained during the day between 16:00 and 18:00 hours
Disc herniation thickness was measured twice by a radiology expert 1 week before and 1 week after treatment
Assessing facet joint distance change
Images for radiological assessment of patients were obtained with a 1.5 Tesla GE brand Magnetic Resonance (MR) device. Sagittal T2A and axial T2A sequences were used. If the same person had herniation at different levels, the level with highest degree of herniation was included in the assessment. All MR images were obtained during the day between 16:00 and 18:00 hours
Facet joint distance was measured twice by a radiology expert 1 week before and 1 week after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Functional capacity change assessment
The functional capacity of patients participating in the study was assessed 1 week before, 1 week and 2 months after treatment using the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire.
Pain change assessment
Pain assessment was recorded 1 week before, 1 week and 2 months after treatment
Other Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of joint range of motion change
Joint range of motion was assessed and recorded 1 week before, 1 week and 2 months after treatment
Study Arms (1)
The Lumbar Rotational Spinal Mobilization Technique
EXPERIMENTALPatients included in the study underwent the lumbar rotational spinal mobilization technique during two sessions per week
Interventions
Patients included in the study underwent the lumbar rotational spinal mobilization(LRSM) technique during two sessions per week. The LRSM technique is applied while patients are lying on their side. The uppermost hip and knee are placed in 90 degree flexion, this is to assist rotational stress, and the lower leg is placed in extension. The lower shoulder is strongly pulled; thus, the upper shoulder is positioned toward the posterior and the pelvis moves anteriorly. The clinician stands in front of the patient. They stabilize the upper shoulder with one hand, and place the palm of the other hand behind the hard part of the ilium wing, with forearm horizontal and fingers turned toward the clinician. A rotational force is applied with pressure in the horizontal direction by pulling the hand on the ilium toward the clinician. In this position, 30 slow repeated movements are performed. The same practice is performed on both sides
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being diagnosed with LDH by MRI and physical examination
- Having pain due to LDH
- Be between the ages of 18 and 65
You may not qualify if:
- History Of Spinal Surgery
- History Of Autoimmune Disease (Ankylosing Spondylitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis Or Other Disease)
- Spondylolysis Or Spondylolisthesis
- Spinal Fracture
- Cardiac Pathology
- Stroke History
- Cauda Equina Syndrome,
- Continuous Painkiller Drug Use
- Spinal inflammation
- Spinal Tumor
- Corticosteroid Drug Use İn The Last Month
- Osteoporosis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Muş Alparslan University
Muş, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
İsmail Taşkent
Muş State Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Mahmut Çakıllı
Muş State Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2022
First Posted
August 2, 2022
Study Start
December 1, 2019
Primary Completion
April 1, 2020
Study Completion
August 1, 2020
Last Updated
August 2, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share