Triclosan-antibacterial Sutures Efficacy on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in Clean-contaminated Wounds
1 other identifier
interventional
430
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Comparing the incidence of SSI in cases using coated Polyglactin 910 suture with Triclosan and cases using Polyglactin 910 suture without Triclosan in clean-contaminated wound surgery
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Feb 2020
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 5, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 10, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2024
CompletedSeptember 6, 2023
September 1, 2023
3.7 years
February 3, 2020
September 4, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of surgical site infection
Incidence of surgical site infection within 30 days
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Hospital stay
30 days
Study Arms (2)
Coated Polyglactin 910 with Triclosan
EXPERIMENTALCoated vicryl plus
Coated Polyglactin 910 without Triclosan
ACTIVE COMPARATORCoated vicryl
Interventions
Coated Polyglactin 910 with Triclosan (coated vicryl plus)
Coated Polyglactin 910 without Triclosan (vicryl)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age: 18-75
- clean-contaminated wound surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has immunodeficiency disorder.
- Patient receiving anti-cancer / immunosuppressive therapy.
- Patients with established pre-operative infection whether community acquired or hospital acquired either at / remote from the operative site.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- ClinAmygatelead
- Misr University for Science and Technologycollaborator
- Al Safwa Hospitalcollaborator
- Al Zohour Hospitalcollaborator
- Al-Menia Univeristy Hospitalcollaborator
- MSKMC Univeristy Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Misr Univeristy for Science and Technology Hospital
Giza, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
Ahmed I, Boulton AJ, Rizvi S, Carlos W, Dickenson E, Smith NA, Reed M. The use of triclosan-coated sutures to prevent surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 3;9(9):e029727. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029727.
PMID: 31481559RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Emad R Issak, Diploma
ClinAmygate
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2020
First Posted
February 5, 2020
Study Start
February 5, 2020
Primary Completion
October 10, 2023
Study Completion
January 30, 2024
Last Updated
September 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share