Study Stopped
Futility
Antibacterial-coated Sutures at Time of Cesarean
ASTC
1 other identifier
interventional
1,169
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Abdominal closure with antibacterial-coated sutures has been shown to reduce wound infections after a number of surgical procedures, but none of the previous trials included cesarean delivery. Our objective is to determine whether use of antibacterial-coated sutures reduces surgical site infection (SSI) after cesarean delivery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jan 2018
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 21, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 9, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 22, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 22, 2026
CompletedJune 22, 2026
June 1, 2026
6.9 years
December 21, 2017
March 25, 2025
June 18, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Participants With Endometritis, Wound Infection, or Other Post-Cesarean Infections
Number of Participants With Endometritis, Wound Infection, or Other Post-Cesarean Infections post-cesarean infections occurring within 30 days of delivery, including endometritis, wound infection, or other infections. Endometritis: Presence of two or more of the following signs with no other identified etiology: fever (\>38°C or \>100.4°F), abdominal pain, fundal tenderness, or cervical/vaginal purulent discharge. Wound Infection: Presence of superficial or deep incisional surgical site infection (SSI), including cellulitis/erythema, induration around the incision, or purulent discharge from the incision site with or without fever, including necrotizing fasciitis. Wound hematoma, seroma, or wound breakdown alone without signs of infection was not considered infection. Other Infections: Pelvic septic thrombosis diagnosed based on persistent signs of endometritis with or without radiologic confirmation, or abdominal/pelvic abscess confirmed radiologically.
Within 30 days following delivery
Participants With Surgical Site Infection
Number of participants who developed a surgical site infection (SSI) following cesarean delivery.
Within 30 days following delivery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Maternal Deaths
Within 30 days following delivery
Participants With Wound Hematoma or Seroma
Within 30 days following delivery
Participants With Puerperal Fever
Within 30 days following delivery
Study Arms (2)
Vicryl-plus, monocryl-plus, PDS-plus (Triclosan-coated Sutures
EXPERIMENTALUse of Monocryl Plus, Vicryl Plus and PDS Plus Suture (Triclosan-coated sutures) will be used exclusively throughout the entire procedure.
Vicryl, monocryl, PDS (not coated with triclosan)
PLACEBO COMPARATORUse of Monocryl, Vicryl and PDS Suture (equivalent uncoated sutures) will be used exclusively throughout the whole procedure.
Interventions
The intervention consists of using Plus group (Triclosan-coated Sutures)
Consists of equivalent sutures (not coated with triclosan) during cesarean delivery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age.
- Women ≥ 24 weeks' viable gestation.
- To undergo cesarean delivery.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient unwilling or unable to provide consent.
- No prenatal care or a non-resident patient who is unlikely to be followed-up after delivery.
- Immunosuppressed patients: i.e., taking systemic immunosuppressant or steroids (e.g. transplant patients; not including steroids for lung maturity), HIV with CD4\<200, or other.
- Decision to use other than suture closure (e.g. secondary wound closure, mesh closure).
- Skin infection.
- Coagulopathy.
- High likelihood of additional surgical procedure beyond cesarean (e.g. scheduled hysterectomy, bowel or adnexal surgery).
- Allergy to Triclosan.
- Incarcerated individuals.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston
Galveston, Texas, 77550, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The study began in January 2018 and underwent multiple Principal Investigator (PI) transitions. The data provided represents the information currently available to the study team.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gayle Olson Koutrouvelis, MD, MPH
- Organization
- UTMB
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Benjamin Bush, M.D.
University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- A confidential computer-generated simple randomization scheme will be prepared and provided on an ongoing basis. A randomization log will be used to track the randomization process. Patients will be masked to the suture material. Both suture types look similar. Patient, surgeons, and staff ascertaining the outcomes will be masked for the suture type.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2017
First Posted
December 29, 2017
Study Start
January 9, 2018
Primary Completion
November 22, 2024
Study Completion
November 22, 2024
Last Updated
June 22, 2026
Results First Posted
June 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share